Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi   With a SAR all you have to do is ask for 'ALL DATA' (this way it does not matter what format they hold that data whether it be digital, email, telephone calls (recorded), written etc).   They then have 30 Days to comply once they have acknowledged your SAR Request (that is unless they require ID Verification) which the 30 Days time limit does not start until they have verified your ID if requested)   Also can I add in DHL response in post#36 I hate it when any Company/Business etc. has the nerve to use the get out clause of 'Human Error'.    This is not the case as it was 'Maladministration' by DHL' not 'Human Error' as stated to you, irrespective of who/which employee of DHL made the 'Human Error' the buck stops with DHL as who/which employee made that error was Employed by DHL.
    • pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform. [if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] .  register as an individual  note the long gateway number given  then log in .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform .  defend all  leave jurisdiction unticked   goto the defence filing section  file the following:     1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).  2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980.  . If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant. .  3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC]  or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied. .. ..ends..   dx          
    • I passed on the article and link to friend. Between us we will now try get the required info to the correct location so that they (whoever in the Govt) can sort out what he is owed. I will keep you updated.  This thread may help others in similar situations. Ethel Street - very helpful research.  Thank you.  Seems like you came up trumps!
    • numerous erudio/drydens claimform threads here already - use our search top right.   your appears to be statute barred as you've never heard of erudio so would not have deferred since your last direct deferment to SLC in 2013    if you wish to bother to even send CCA/CPR that's upto you but the bottom line is to erudio you've ignored everything to date yoy might also ignore a claimform.   but ofcourse you are not!!   if the above is true   pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform. [if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] .  register as an individual  note the long gateway number given  then log in .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform .  defend all  leave jurisdiction unticked   goto the defence filing section  file the following: 1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).  2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980.  . If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant. .  3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC]  or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied. .. ..ends..   dx      
    • Well I would want my £50 back also but hey ho if your satisfied its been resolved.....there was no way you could ever be liable anyway as your contract was with TC not RC.   Thread title updated.   Andy
  • Our picks

AndiPi

EPC plc 'fine' cloned number plate? Netherlands

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1122 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

Recently my mother received a fine from a company called EPC plc. Pan European Collection.

 

The letter was demanding payment for a fine in the Netherlands, where her car has never been. She sent them a letter saying that. They've rejected it. There were no payment details in the original or the new letter.

 

There are a few errors in there. Capital letters mid sentence.

 

They've told us to contact the police about the cloned plates and the police don't want to know.

 

Where do we stand on getting this annulled? Is it even a real company?

 

Thanks very much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

Do you have the letter to hand please? It could help the guys to advise if we could see a copy, suitably redacted to remove personal details.

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure to share a photo on here.

 

I've been adviced to contact the DVLA anyway about the cloned plates though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and now you totally ignore

as you've already made them think a mug awaits fleecing by replying.

 

 

you might even get a few scary phonecalls too.

you ignore those.

 

 

theres nowt they can do to you.

 

 

if you wish to take up the cloning with whomever then so be it.

but again theres nowt you can really do about it.

 

 

10,000's of cloned plates all over the EU and elsewhere


..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice!

 

Good advice. I've told my mother to ignore them. Citées the posts that have been shared here. She's going to go into the bank and warn them about this case they try and grab money from the account (not sure how but it happened before) and we will contact the DVLA in due course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Their response to her statement is tripe

but the reality is they will not be doing anything about it because they havent even told you who the creditor is for this supposed event.

 

 

A complaint to actionfraud about them would be in the offing,

you wont get any action but without the necessary details it is just a spoof letter that anyone can post out.

 

 

As for the DVLA she should ask them who has obtained her keeper details as that is undoubtedly a breach of the DPA and this time the DVLA are culpable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...