Jump to content


G.R.R

CP Plus £80 Penalty Notice for SWT Hampton Court Railway Station

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1086 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

 

As the title says, my car (I wasn't the driver - really!) got an £80 Penalty Notice from CP Plus while parked at Hampton Court Railway station car park.

 

 

The reason for the penalty was given as code '03' -

which is "not displaying a valid pay and display ticket

" even though a ticket was purchased and on display!

 

Thanks in advance for any help/advice on this one?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

Could you copy and paste the questions from the forum stikky and post them up here together with your answers please? This will help us to advise you.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket-(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

My best, HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Further info:

 

For windscreen tickets (NTD) please answer the following questions.

 

1 The date of infringement?

 

Rather not say - but it was in the last couple of weeks

 

2 Did you appeal to the parking company?

 

No, not yet.

 

Also, I've not received a Notice to Keeper yet.

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

then you await the NTK..

 

 

can we just confirm

they ARE using the word PENALTY

 

 

if they are

then they cant In basic terms

as they don't own the land the railway does

and only they the railway Co., can issue PENALY charges under byelaws

 

 

lots of like threads here already regarding this if it DOES say PENALTY


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response. Yes, the precise wording on the top is: "Notice issued by CP Plus Limited £80 PENALTY NOTICE".

 

I would like to know if I should appeal, given that the original parking charge (£6.50 for the day) was paid?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok great so they are trying to spoof you into thinking they can operate/enforce under the railway byelaws

which they cant ..

 

 

let me find a few threads

 

 

easy sorted

 

 

dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this dx!

 

I got the impression that appeals made to these companies are pretty much ignored and simple result in another demand for money.

 

So it all comes down to whether SouthWestTrains are going to use Bylaw 14, as their operator (CP Plus) can't (if i'm interpreting this correctly).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SWT wont know any ticket has been issued


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Beavis decision means that it is accpeted that penalty claues in consumer contract are allowed under certain circumstances so the use of the word penalty is allowable unless it is an intention to deceive te recipient into thinking that this is not a contractual matter but a reference to the RTA.

 

SWT have contracted out parking management to a company that by agreement issues its own tickets/charges and SWT get a few quid out of the deal.

 

This would be legal if the parking co were paid to adminster the parking under Railway bylaws but this isnt the case.

 

The parking co get to keep all of the money from "penalties" issued this way as the correct procedure and use of bylaw 14 would mean that the matter goes to court and the money goes to the govt not the parking co or event the railway operator.

 

Parking co's sometimes tell your that you are in breach of bylaw 14 ( possibly true) but as said that means no money for them or for railway co so they only use this threat as coercion to get you to pay them.

 

Railway land is not "relevent land" as far as POFA goes so no keeper liability ( there is under bylaw 14 so beware) and keeper details thus unlawfully obtained for purposes of DPA.

 

You thus have a choice

- go along with their game and appeal and regardless of the merits of your appeal it will get you nowhere (why are they going to admit they are less than honest)

or just let them waste their time and money chasing you.

 

If it gets to a solicitors letter then you can respond saying there is no contract with CPP,

no breach of contract

or bylaw 14

and that any claim will be vigourously defended.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...