Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

tsb DD Guarantee GB Energy/Co-Op Energy - Indemnity Claim ?


the thinker
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2596 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi,

 

i made a dd indemnity claim on the 13/12/16

the bank are asking for the advance notice letter,

 

i contacted the company concern and they have refused to deal with me.

the payments which they took are in error and i believe im entitled to a full and immediate refund of the amount paid from my bank.

 

also i shall give them 30 days to investigate

then i want to claim the refund back in court.

 

also im going on breached of their obligations under the banking contract,

Banking: Conduct of Business sourcebook (BCOBS),section 150 Schedule 5.

 

what would b my POC be?

regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Youre entitled to a refund from your bank. It isnt up to them to decide yes or no. They have to do it, butbear no comeback for missed payments. You have to sort them yourself. Speak to a manager. Not a phone rep or desk jockey.

 

Which bank was it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are very happy to help you with a BCOBS claim – but you need to prepare carefully. Can you give us more information about the transaction and also what evidence have you got? Have you got anything in writing from a supplier? And have you got anything in writing from the bank?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

 

tsb and the company gb energy.

 

dds were taken in error

 

when i went through the online statements there were errors in the amounts that should have been taken and it looks like theres errors on all of the payments and the amount taken.

 

paul pester (ceo) passed in on to his colleague and i said errors were taken and thats all you need to know.

 

then i said can you reply by letter informing me why i havent been credited.

 

cindy on phone call said i never sent the letters in (even though sent by recorded mail n special delivery) and she keep saying "we need the advance notice"

 

i kept repeating that the orginator wont speak to me.

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the appropriate forum.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I've found a reference to "advance notice".

 

It seems that you must be served and advance notice before the first payment and also before any variations.

 

However, I don't see anywhere that the direct debit guarantee requires an advance notice to be activated. I've certainly never heard of it before and a quick Google doesn't show me anything.

 

I hope you are my me saying that that your posts are expressed in a rather abbreviated texting style that makes it difficult to follow.

 

I don't know who Paul Pester is. You really don't make it clear whether it is TSB or the energy company. I've asked you if there's been any writing but I'm not sure that you have answered.

 

It would also help if you could space, punctuate and paragraph space your posts. We work very hard here to try and help people and it would be nice if you would present your story in the way that you would like it to be presented to you. It will make life much easier all round.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

sorry

paul pester is ceo of tsb.

i have written to tsb registered address twice by recorded delivery/special delivery to make claim under the d/d guarantee.

gb energy wont talk to me.

tsb have said they wont refund until they get advance notice, and i have repeated to tsb that the orginator wont talk to me.

tsb said they will send letter to confirm why i havent recieved a full and immediate refund, but awaiting letter.

 

regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you seen anywhere that an Advance Notice is a necessary stage in invoking the direct debit guarantee? I certainly haven't seen it.

 

Where the erroneous direct debits the first ones which went out? Or had there already been direct debits which had gone out correctly?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but your comments above don't make much sense and also you don't seem to have answered my questions in post number nine

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

 

Where the erroneous direct debits the first ones which went out? no, only picked up the errors when i checked my online account. as soon has i knew i informed bank of errors with letter.

 

Or had there already been direct debits which had gone out correctly? none of the direct debits went out correctly, all of them were errors with the amount taken.

 

regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

How many direct debits have been paid erroneously, when did these begin and has there been a problem with each one?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. At the outset, you said that you are prepared to make trouble and bring an action on BCOBS if necessary.

 

There are two things you can do. You can either make a formal complaint to the bank about their refusal to invoke the direct debit guarantee – on spurious grounds – and say that you want to take this to the ombudsman. They will start a formal complaint process and they will take eight weeks to get back to you and maybe knock you back in which case you will have to use the ombudsman and wait up to 12 months or more for an uncertain decision.

 

Or, you can send a letter before action threatening a BCOBS action which is likely to have a fairly rapid effect. I can imagine that the bank would put its hands up and pay you a reasonable sum in compensation within 2 to 3 months. In the event that they decided to call you out on it, you would go to court and on the basis of what you say, you will probably win and get a BCOBS judgement which would be a very excellent thing for all bank customers everywhere. As I say, this is most unlikely to happen. It is much more likely that the bank will put its hands up in order to avoid the time and trouble and they will make a payment to you as a gesture of goodwill.

 

If you decide to take a BCOBS action then it would be a small claim. You would have to claim a modest amount of compensation – to get your money back and also some compensation for the hassle. I don't think you that she told us the value of the errors. Please can you do this.

 

Depending on the value of the claim, the claim would cost anything from about £30 to maybe 80 or so. There will be a hearing fee which is currently quite a lot – but I can't remember – but on the basis that you one, you would get all of this back. If you issue the claim and incurred any of these costs and if the bank put their hands up then you will get your costs back as well.

 

If you want to start a BCOBS claim then we will be right behind you and we would help you as much as we can. Very few people have ever started a BCOBS claim. Only one of them became successful and that was because of the stupid accident by Santander. However, we have noticed that when the two or three other BCOBS claims were started, the banks very quickly fell into line and made very decent offers of compensation.

 

The most spectacular one was NatWest which tried to wreck somebody's credit file. The claim started as a claim for about £200 and NatWest eventually settled for £7500 which was quite amazing. At that point it fell off the forum

because I think that NatWest at that point insisted that nothing else be publicised on the forum or anywhere else. So I'm not really completely certain of the figures. However, don't let these figures to go to your head. If you want to start a BCOBS action then I would suggest a modest amount of compensation which really reflected your losses and then we would see how it went.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay. That's fine.

 

You will need to understand the basic steps of bringing a small claim. There is lots of information on this forum or if you want to find in one place then we have a reasonable comprehensive chapter in the Consumer Survival Handbook available on Amazon for a small price.

 

Whatever you do, read around. It's not complicated but you are better off understanding the steps so that you are confident in what you do.

 

If you want to start then you will have to send a letter before action giving them 14 days. I think you will have to do take into account the days which are not working days because of the Christmas and New Year season.

 

Your letter before action suffered set out briefly what has happened, the fact that you have tried to invoke the direct debit guarantee and they have refused to honour it and they are imposing conditions relating to an advance notice which are not included in the guarantee. Point out them that you have not received an advance notice and this is yet another reason why you are invoking the guarantee.

 

Tell them that you consider they are treating you unfairly and contrary to the Banking: Conduct of Business Regulations and that if they do not return your money to you within 14 days then you will start a legal action in the County Court and without any further notice.

 

Let us know if what I suggested above is correct and if you're going to do it

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

ive already sent this-

 

I have not received a reply to my letters dated 13/12/2016 and 15/12/2016 regarding the Direct Debit Guarantee Claim made to you on the 13/12/2016. This letter explained what is unfair to me and why I am entitled to a refund.

 

I am once again requesting a full refund under the Direct Debit Guarantee and it state as follows-

 

Organisations using the Direct Debit Scheme go through a careful vetting process before they're authorised, and are closely monitored by the banking industry.

 

 

The efficiency and security of Direct Debit is monitored and protected by your own bank or building society.

The Direct Debit Guarantee applies to all Direct Debits. It protects you in the rare event that there is an error in the payment of your Direct Debit*.

 

Direct Debit Guarantee

The Guarantee is offered by all banks and building societies that accept instructions to pay Direct Debits

 

If there are any changes to the amount, date or frequency of your Direct Debit the organisation will notify you (normally 10 working days) in advance of your account being debited or as otherwise agreed.

 

 

If you request the organisation to collect a payment, confirmation of the amount and date will be given to you at the time of the request

 

If an error is made in the payment of your Direct Debit, by the organisation or your bank or building society, you are entitled to a full and immediate refund of the amount paid from your bank or building society

 

If you receive a refund you are not entitled to, you must pay it back when the organisation asks you to

You can cancel a Direct Debit at any time by simply contacting your bank or building society. Written confirmation may be required. Please also notify the organisation.

 

* The Guarantee covers Direct Debit payments. It cannot be used to address contractual disputes between you and the billing organisation.

 

Also I believe that you have breached my contract under the Banking: Conduct of Business sourcebook (BCOBS) UNDER SECTION 150 (Section 138D)of the Financial Services and Markets Act. TSB PLC has a duty to operate my current account so the consequences are not unfair to me, its is obliged to have regards to my interests, when making decisions.

 

I would like a reply as soon as possible so that I know you have received this letter. If you don't agree to the refund, could you please then send me a detailed response saying why you don't agree.

 

To avoid taking court action, I am willing to use Alternative Dispute Resolution to resolve this problem.

 

If I do not receive a satisfactory response from you within 30 days of the date of this letter, I intend to issue proceedings against you in the county court without further notice. This may increase your liability for costs.

 

I refer you to the Practice Direction on pre-action conduct under the Civil Procedure Rules, and in particular to paragraph 4 which sets out the sanctions the court may impose if you fail to comply with the Practice Direction.

 

I look forward to your acknowledgement.

Yours faithfully

 

regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it's a big shame that you offer them 30 days to resolve it. That gives them lots of breathing space and they will take that as a sign that you really don't want to go ahead.

 

Also, it's a shame that you said that you be prepared to use an ADR solution. They will simply propose the ombudsman. That will get you into extended delays, as I have suggested.

 

It's a shame you don't come here for advice before you send the letters off. The real question to have asked and – which you have failed to do so – is where in the direct debit guarantee is there a requirement that you furnish them with an advance notice before the guarantee could be triggered. That really is the nugget and that's what you want to find out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

 

i havent sent that letter yet, my mistake its what i will be sending today (me bad) its a draft waiting to b sent. (wanted you to have a look first)

 

no i failed to ask them is where in the direct debit guarantee is there a requirement that you furnish them with an advance notice before the guarantee could be triggered, havent asked.

 

regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it's a matter for you, but in that case I would shorten it. I don't see you need to go through all the stodgy detail of the direct debit guarantee. They know it all.

 

I think you simply need to tell them that you have tried to trigger the direct debit guarantee that they have refused. Tell them that they have insisted on receiving an advance notice that you don't believe that this is a pre-requirement for triggering the direct debit guarantee. If they disagree then please would they tell you where it can be found. Tell them furthermore, you haven't received any advance notice and that is part of your complaint.

 

Tell them they are treating you unfairly within the meaning of BCOBS and unless they give you a full refund within 14 days that you will start a legal action against them and without any further notice.

 

I'm not sure that you need any more

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I suggest that you respond to them as I have suggested above but with a reference to the letter which you have just received. Once again, you need to ask them where you can find the requirement that there should be an advance notice letter – especially when no advance notice has been served.

 

I found the time to have a conversation with the Direct Debit people. It took a bit of time but they eventually agreed with me that there is no requirement for this formality to be satisfied before a bank has a duty to investigate. They did point out that a bank might quite reasonably require this information as part of their investigation – but it is certainly not a condition of the Direct Debit Guarantee.

 

If you have no advance notice from the energy supplier – then I think you are completely justified in sending the letter before action and then beginning to sue TSB. As I said, I think that the bank will put their hands up once it gets out of the hands of the jobsworth and into some people who think for themselves.

 

If you're going to start the action then I would start it for your money back plus, say £150, compensation. This is probably slightly more than it's worth – unless you say different – but I think that TSB would be very unwilling to see a BCOBS judgement against them.

 

Furthermore, I can imagine that if they did put their hands up, they would want to do it on conditions of confidentiality – which I would refuse them.

 

The story with the NatWest case which I referred to above is that they were sued for a small amount and the claimant was relentless in pursuit of principle. They offered to settle and he said no. They raise the offer over the claim amount and he still said no. He said there was a larger principle at stake. They raise the offer several times and he still said no – and then he disappeared out of the picture and we had no more. I expect that he receive the money – and although I found it frustrating, – I can hardly say I blame him.

 

Although the TSB might make you an offer of the amount you are claiming, you are not obliged to accept it if you have a reasonable basis for continuing your claim to judgement. I think that if a bank is deliberately flouting the terms of the direct debit guarantee, then this could well be reasonable grounds to get a BCOBS judgement against them and then to pass that judgement onto the FCA and also a copy to the direct debit people. This would be a very serious matter for TSB and which they would want to avoid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

  1. The claimant is a customer of the defendant bank, account number XXXXX
  2. The defendant bank is a member of the direct debit guarantee scheme and is also regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority
  3. The claimant set up a direct debit in favour of XXX Ltd.
  4. XXX Ltd did not provide the claimant with any kind of advance notice of the payments that would be taken
  5. XXX Ltd took a succession of erroneous payments from XX date to XX date and refused to return them.
  6. The claimant applied to the defendant bank for the return of the payments under the direct debit guarantee scheme
  7. the defendant refused to begin an investigation or return the payments on the grounds that they required site of an advance notice letter
  8. the direct debit guarantee scheme contains no requirement for such formalities to be required in any event the claimant is unable to provide such notice as it was not provided in this itself is part of the complaint.
  9. The defendants requirement of this formality is arbitrary and is unfair treatment under the Banking: Conduct of Business Regulations 2009 – made under the FCA's powers contained in the Financial Services and Market Act 2000
  10. the claimant claims the return of erroneous payments from the defendant under the direct debit guarantee scheme of £XXX plus compensation of £XXX

 

By the way, I realise that in this suggested particulars of claim, I didn't indicate that you were a customer or give your account number. You will need to do this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...