Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

DMP with Fee Paying Gregory Pennington DMC, - looking for alternative.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2207 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

what do you send them?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

we know what an i&e looks like

why wold we want to see a blank one of those........

 

 

what did YOU send them to prompt them sending the above?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was under the impression it was a CCA request to each one??

 

so what type of debt has PRA got,

what was it and who was the original creditor.

.let me guess MBNA credit Card..?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, I'm a bit useless at this.

I reread the earlier post from silverfox saying the cca was only good for dept pre 2007 but it's handy to have anyway.

I'll do that next.

 

yes mbna, credit card debt 7k,

 

I'll put up the letter from pra that includes the settlement offer.

 

It does mention cca on it but only briefly.

 

pra letter

pra1stletter.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

that not a return to a CCa request, even if you did send one

 

 

its simply the yearly statement they must send if they consider themselves the creditor [owner] of your debt.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Standard holding letter. Wait for them to comply. It could take a while-if at all!

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have 12+2 working days

if they've failed that you could stop any payment too them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And the reason they return the fee back...not as a gesture of goodwill...but because it removes the legality of your request ..unless payment is made and accepted the request is not legally valid.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Hi guys, it's been a while.

 

I've had a few developments since I was last on.

 

I received a letter from the PRA group (previous MBNA CC £7688) confirming the dept is unenforceable.

 

I've also received letters back from Link regarding the cca request.

I'm posting it up to double check my own suspicions that it to is unenforceable as none of the returned documents have my details on them.

 

I appreciate the replies and also the help I've received from the site, so thank you.

 

Honestly I don’t know when I opened the account, I’ve had so many in the past ten years. The dates on some of the sheets don’t match, some say 2006 and others 2014.

linkpdffixed.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a reconstituted version thats why its blank...and so they have satisfied your request re section 78.

 

But if they wish to enforce it using a reconstituted version and your debt is pre or post April 2007...its useless because it should be a mirrored image of the original ...less your signature.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 things, the original agreement was in 2006 according to the fax header so a reconstituted copy isnt allowable.

 

Secondly Link has used the CCA fee of £1 as a creidt to your debt so get onto them and inform them that this crookedness will not be tolerated as they are doing this deliberately to reset the SB clock.

 

im sure that others will have a form of words more appropriate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its allowable in the case of complying with a section 77/78 request....its useless if they wish to go near a court room with it.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's the usual 66220000 they all trot out to a BC CCA return.

interesting the charges are £12 that didn't come in until later 2006

what date did you open the account?

 

those exact docs are on here numerous times

 

don't think those T&C belong to that card takeout date

they should be sending 2006 ones if that's the year you opened it

is this not on your credit file under closed accounts or an older CRA copy you might have

should tell you the takeout date

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should state takeout date on that page

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Clearscore haven't replied to my request yet for the start date on the Barclay card.

 

I have received a letter from Santander about my card with them, I replied with the SAR request.

 

They sent me a reply that didn't have any of my details on it, like they didn't know who lived at my address.

 

Three letters attached.

convert-jpg-to-pdf.net_2018-03-13_14-20-07.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

thread tidied

 

I wasn't aware we'd asked you to contact clearscore?

 

as for satans bank sar

you did read all of the posts in the sar thread?

and included a list of all your old addresses and a current CTAX copy if you've moved since taking the card out?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You’re quite right, you didn’t ask me to contact clearscore, I made that request myself to see if it was possible for them to find it for me as I can’t. I posted this info just as a follow up to the statement in your previous reply.

 

Santander Sar. Because the Santander credit card was taken out within the last 10 years clear score shows the start date of this card which was Dec 2010. I’ve lived at the same address for 15 years, I’ve had my mortgage with Santander for those 15 years, as well as a personal current account for 15 years and the credit card for 8 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

so post 46 then no dice for plink

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read post 46

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...