Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • nothing you can do can product against the very rare judge lottery syndrome.
    • not sure why you added the blue line I've highlighted? that's no in the we gave you.   as for your question... PRAC's roboclaim computer knows when the account was taken out, after all it raised the claim and checked everything carefully first before issuing the request via northants bulk courts equally inept roboclaim computer... 
    • I've been researching in preparation of compiling my particularised defence/WS.    I'm none too happy that some judges still seem to be siding with DCAs and seemingly brushing aside anything that we have assumed to be "necessary" for DCAs to have a winning case.    Reading a recent "summary" from another poster (another thread with case similar to mine - very old, illegible application form, no default notice, reliance on their own software to prove it was ever sent) and the judgment made in favour of the DCA and even suggesting that there was no "agreement with the DCA, they simply owned the debt, not the agreement"  Makes me very nervous.    Especially if cases like this will be judged on "probability" - the probability that if I signed the original application form, then I must have taken out the credit card and racked up the alleged debt as shown in statements enclosed in their WS (and dated some ten years later).   Is it ok to post some "evidence" I've found from elsewhere?    This is in line with my fears that regardless of how hard one tries to rebut the "lack of evidence" produced by DCAs for chasing these very old "alleged" debts, it does appear to come down to the luck of what judge you get on the day and how much they can be swayed by the DCA solicitor.    A quick Google search produced the following - from one case - this related to a credit agreement - which resulted in someone being made bankrupt - that person appealed the bankruptcy order on the grounds of defective credit agreement and default notice and this was the appeal judge's decision:   The necessary formalities for the entry into the regulated consumer credit agreement (which related to the debt in issue) were not complied with; The default notice served in respect of that credit agreement was defective.   The First Ground The Appellant argued that she did not receive the terms and conditions when she entered into the credit agreement and, accordingly, section 61 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (“CCA”) had not been complied with and the agreement could not be enforced. The agreement had been entered in 1995 and, whilst it had provided a microfiche copy of the front page of the application, the Respondent had been unable to provide a copy of the terms.   Despite the terms not being produced, the District Judge had found that, in the circumstances, it was very likely that such terms existed and would have been provided to the Appellant when she entered into the Agreement. Mr Justice Mann held that this was a finding that the District Judge was entitled to make.   Further, Mr Justice Mann found that it was implicit from the District Judge’s findings that she considered that the terms and conditions not only existed but had been subscribed to by the Appellant’s signature and, consequently, the requirements of section 61 CCA were fulfilled. Mr Justice Mann held that this was also a justifiable finding which should not be interfered with on appeal.   The Second Ground The Appellant also argued that the default notice upon which the Respondent relied did not comply with the Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notice) Regulations 1989 because it stated the full balance of the account rather than the total of the missed payments. The Respondent argued that, as a result of the missed payments, it was contractually entitled to the entire balance subject to the service of the appropriate notice, a requirement which was fulfilled by the default notice itself and, consequently, the sum required to remedy the breach was the entire amount.   Mr Justice Mann agreed with the Respondent and the District Judge, holding that: “If by the time the default notice is served circumstances have arisen which entitle the lender to recover not merely sums which might be regarded as arrears, by which I assume is meant accumulated minimum payments, but also the whole of the sum, then they are entitled to claim that sum, and the sum to require to remedy the breach for non-payment of that sum is the payment of the whole sum due. The bank is not confined, at that stage, to claiming merely the amount of arrears if it has an accrued contractual right to have the whole of the sum.”   Do judgments like these not mean that a lot of what you guys do on here (and for which I and many others are VERY grateful) somewhat redundant. What is happening to judges just accepting "well, the terms must have been there if you signed it" -    Feeling quite nervous now.
    • we know it wasn't done to avoid enforcement we understand completely. but that doesn't take from away the fact that it happened   you can't appeal the pcn's on the basis that 'it was not his vehicle to levy upon'. the law clearly states otherwise.          
    • here is a question for you, is yu house divided up into a retail/business area  and domestic area for business rates purposes? If not why on earth are you paying business water rates? ceertainly not for tax purposes as you can claim any legit expense without having to reclassify your home as a business premises. i would be stopping this nonsense and goping back to whatever water supplier is the domestic one for your area. there is stuff all they can do to get the £40 from you whan you do that.
  • Our picks

Mjm998

Halifax credit card mishandling complaint. No statements for 31 months

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1039 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

A bit of a long one. Sorry!

 

I took out a credit card with halifax about 9 years ago

stupidly ramped up £14k debt.

I've paid off as much as I could since this time.

No defaults but paid late 5 times (by 2 or 3 days.)

 

 

in April 2014 halifax closed my account with no contact or reason.

At this time I phoned and said my statements had disappeared online and was just told my account was closed so I wouldn't be able to see them anymore. (I assumed they were allowed to do this. )

 

Since then I've phoned a number of time telling them I had no statements anymore and they gave me info on balance.

 

Last month a debt specialist told me they couldn't refuse me statements and were breaking credit agreements.

 

 

I've sent off a complaint

they came back saying they'd done no wrong

but sent me 3 years of photocopy statements showing that despite paying off at least 320 a month my balance is still shrinking by approx £5 a month.

My APR is 29.9 and minimum payment doesn't always cover the interest.

 

Halifax say they have not miss handled and offered ey £180.

 

 

I turned it down and they are considering my case.

 

 

Does anyone know Whether I have grounds to claim compensation?

 

Thanks for taking the time to read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello welcome to CAG.

 

Good ole shallowfax!!

 

Firstly STOP discussing this over the phone, you need to get a paper trail of evidence.

 

Secondly, check your credit file, see what is on there ref this account.

 

Send Halifax a SAR (£10) and get the complete history of this account, when they send you the SAR you can tot up all of the banks charges, levied on this account, and go about reclaiming them.

 

Are you in financial difficulty?


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You dont have grounds for compensation but if they have levied any late payment or failed direct debit or overlimit charges, these are typically £12 a time, then you do have grounds for re claiming them, plus restitutional interest at the contractual rate (29.9%).

 

So, as BB advises, get a SAR sent to Shallowfax and dont forget a £10 postal order to cover the fee, they must send you everything inside 40+2 days


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

 

 

 

GEMHL Settled

Barclaycard Settled

A & L SETTLED IN FULL :lol:

Spml Reluctantly withdrawn

Blackhorse pre 31-7-06 Demand removal sent 23 8 06. ICO ordered removal jan 2007....REMOVED:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if they did not send statements

they cant charge interest for that period.

 

 

were you getting regular notice of sums in arrears letters?

 

 

dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No,

I had no paperwork at all until I complained and did an SAR request last month.

 

 

Had 3 years of photocopied statements so far, nothing else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

under section 78 of the consumer credit act they are obliged to send periodic statements

 

 

failure to do so means that they cannot charge interest during the period of non compliance.


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. That's really useful.

 

2 days after receiving my complaint, they rang and said they had broken no rules and would not be refunding anything.

 

 

She asked me

'what difference would statements have made to my handling of the account anyway?'

And offered me £180.

 

 

I refused and told her I that all communication should be in writing from this point.

 

I'm now just trying to arm myself for their inevitable refusal letter, so this is very useful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, I've had a final response from halifax,

they've admitted that they withheld statements and that I phoned 'numerous' times and was wrongly told that I was not eligible to see a statement

 

. But they've said that this has made no impact on my ability to pay the debt and they will not repay any interest or charges.

They've offered £200.

 

(They have charged me £12,300 interest alone over the months of withholding any statements or account info)

 

do I have any case for furthering my complaint with the aFOS, or do I accept their offer?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact theyve offered you anything so far shows they know theyre wrong, but they think offering you something will absolve them of all responsibility and make you go away. Sadly it works for the majority of people that issue complaints.

 

I mean think of it. They give you 200 and you stop complaining, or they have to wipe 12.5k off your debt ( or refund you) and suffer a massive loss.


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The fact theyve offered you anything so far shows they know theyre wrong, but they think offering you something will absolve them of all responsibility and make you go away. Sadly it works for the majority of people that issue complaints.

 

I mean think of it. They give you 200 and you stop complaining, or they have to wipe 12.5k off your debt ( or refund you) and suffer a massive loss.

 

So would my next step be FOS? They've admitted in writing they did mishandle, but basically say they don't believe that I had the ability to clear the debt anyway. Does that make me look bad?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be an idea to ring and ask

Might alco be FCA too under the CCA conc rules too


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Might be an idea to ring and ask

Might alco be FCA too under the CCA conc rules too

 

Sorry, ring and ask who?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they actually issued a final response?


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Have they actually issued a final response?

Yes, this letter states I can escalate to the FOS but they don't believe that I could have paid anymore anyway so statements would not have benefitted me. they offer £200 as final settlement. They have admitted telling me I couldn't have statements on many occasions and wrongly marking my card as stolen and closing it/blocking statements without informing me.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But they can't charge into if they don't send account statements

Tell the fos


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But they can't charge into if they don't send account statements

Tell the fos

I am getting all my paperwork together all will fill out the FOS form this week. (I have an autistic child who I probably need to be back at school to make sure I get this done properly.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Relax, the ball is firmly in your court, and AFAIK you have up to six months in which to escalate this to the FOS.

 

Shallowfax have IMO admitted fault, and know they're culpable, and are hoping you'll be gullible enough to accept their very insulting offer.

 

There's plenty of legs in this yet, and I think you can at least put another zero on the end of that for compo alone, least of all, have a huge chunk, if not all, of their fees wiped.


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Relax, the ball is firmly in your court, and AFAIK you have up to six months in which to escalate this to the FOS.

 

Shallowfax have IMO admitted fault, and know they're culpable, and are hoping you'll be gullible enough to accept their very insulting offer.

 

There's plenty of legs in this yet, and I think you can at least put another zero on the end of that for compo alone, least of all, have a huge chunk, if not all, of their fees wiped.

Thanks, I really hope you're right, it would be nice to not be giving halifax all my didposable income.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it's in the hands of the FOS now.

Thanks to you all for your help, will let you know how when I hear back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent no worries.


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just heard from the FOS and they've sided with Halifax saying that that £200 is fair compensation for 31 months of being refused statements so I'm guessing that's the end of the road for my complaint?! Thanks for all the advice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you now getting regular statements ? Are you still paying monthly ?

 

Andy


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes,

I have kept up payments through 31 months of no statements.

They restarted last month.

 

 

The thing is,

I'm not sure the FOS has listened at all because she's explained to me how and why they never set a minimum payment of less than the interest added that month,

but I have copy statements that clearly show this.

 

Also this article

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/money/2014/aug/09/banks-scandal-personal-loan-errors-payout-refund?client=safari

Shows banks having to repay interest for wrongly worded statements,

yet FOS say halifax have don't nothing wrong in allowing me no statements and £200 for inconvenience is reasonable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you still have use of the credit facility or is it payment only status now ?


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's Payment only now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...