Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You say that you had some communication with Blue Motor Finance. Did you do this on the telephone or in writing? You should read our customer services guide. It's extremely important. You should try to do everything in writing but if you have to do things on the telephone then you should make sure that you make detailed notes of your call and then confirm them in writing. So for instance if your discussion with Blue Motor Finance was on the phone, you should make a note of everything that was said – including the fact that they said that the matter would have to be investigated because the dealer was prepared to carry out repair – and you should send this to be motor Finance with a note confirming that this was the conversation they had with you. It is very important to develop a paper trail. Otherwise everything becomes deniable. The situation is that if a defect occurs within the first 30 days of ownership of the vehicle then you are entitled to reject the vehicle under the Consumer Rights Act. You have to assert this right by contacting the dealer – and in this case Blue Motor Finance – in writing and point out that you are asserting a right under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and you are rejecting the vehicle. Tell them that you want arrangements to be made to give you a refund of all costs including any costs or interest which has been levied by the finance company. Be tough with the finance company. Don't act as if they are do you a favour. Make sure they understand that you are not in the mood to muck around and you won't wait very long either. Don't forget that in this case because you have purchased the vehicle through hire purchase, it is Blue Motor Finance which is the responsible party. That is going to be helpful because if you had had to deal only with Chobham, you would have had very serious difficulties. In addition to writing to Blue Motor Finance to assert your rights, I suggest that you send them a copy of the article from the daily mail which has been linked above and you can draw their attention in your letter to the fact that this is the company that they are dealing with. You can send these messages to Blue Motor Finance by email. You should do this urgently. This weekend. You should also tell Blue Motor Finance that you have now taken advice and that you now understand that their initial statement that the matter needed investigation and that the dealer was going to carry out repair, is unacceptable and actually unlawful and contrary to the short-term right to reject contained in the Consumer Rights Act. Tell Blue Motor Finance that if they will not cooperate immediately in returning all of your money and cancelling the finance agreement that you will consider legal action against them for breach of contract and also for treating you unfairly country to their statutory duty under regulations developed by the Financial Conduct Authority. You should stop driving the car immediately. How far away from you is the dealer? Frankly you want to get rid of the car as quickly as possible. If you had not had finance in place then we would have cautioned you about this because you could end up losing possession of the car and also not having your refund. However, as you are dealing with a regulated finance company, and of course as the money has been loaned to you and you have not paid a great deal of it back it, your best interests would be in getting rid of the car so that it is no longer your responsibility to maintain, to insure or to generally worry about.   In addition to the hire purchase loan, did you pay anything on deposit? How did you pay? Did you pay by cash or by debit card or credit card? If you're confident then you should drive the car carefully to the dealer and leave it with them on their forecourt. Do not leave in the streets. You should photograph the car inside and out so that there is no argument later on as to the condition of the car when you returned it. If you are worried about driving the car then you should tell Blue Motor Finance that you want them to make immediate arrangements for the removal of the vehicle. Tell them that you are giving them seven days to organise this at the end of which you will charge in storage at £10 per day. This is assuming that you are keeping the vehicle on your own property and not on the road. As soon as you have got rid of the car, you should take immediate steps to inform the authorities that you are not the owner of the vehicle. Make sure that when you return the car it is returned with all its paperwork but you should use whatever portion of the V5 is necessary to transfer ownership away from you. Take copies of all the documentation before you hand them back. If you fail to do this and if the dealer does not change the ownership – then you are at risk of some other person driving it in your name and incurring penalties for road traffic offences or parking offences. That will then give you more complicated problems to deal with as you have to try and convince people that you are not the owner and not the driver of the car at the time. You should calculate exactly what this whole thing has cost you. This means all of your out-of-pocket expenses including the cost of going to see the car, going to fetch it, driving it back, any expense of insuring it or anything else because later on we will help you claim all of this back. Of course you will claim all expenses and fees et cetera associated with the finance agreement. As a matter of interest, how recent is the MOT on this vehicle? Who MOT'd it?  
    • Brexit = United Ireland within 20 years.  Arguable possibility.    
    • Please can you tell us about the car you bought - make/model/mileage/price.   What are the surnames of Nathan and of Alex?   What address are Chobham Central Motors using?   As you will see from this website and from the Daily Mail article -  Downfall of car dealer who sold death traps: Chancer forged court papers and refused to pay refunds | Daily Mail Online WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK Ahmed Alwaheeb's firms sold cars riddled with faults - and which sometimes had government recall notices that required manufacturers to fix safety issues - but refused to refund customers.     You have bought your car from a bunch of dealers who don't seem to be very scrupulous about the way that they operate.  However, you have saved yourself by using a finance company.  I think that you may be the first people we have come across who have not paid cash to this company.   Citizens Advice are right that if your arrangement is a hire purchase arrangement then your action will be against Blue Motor Finance -  Home Page - Blue Motor Finance BLUE.CO.UK     Chobham used to be registered with the Motoring Ombudsman but they withdrew after some decisions against them.   The so called Motorcomplaints service which is apparently run by someone called Alex, is in fact part of the Chobham/EMC etc bunch and seems to have been setup to make customers think that their complaint has been reviewed by an independent arbiter - when in fact it hasn't.   The motor complaints service to which you been referred by Chobham and which is apparently run by Alex should not be confused with the Motor Ombudsman scheme which is a legitimate organisation although frankly it's probably not very useful anyway.   All of this has been reported to Citizen's Advice and Trading Standards many times and nothing has ever been done about them.  Even the Daily Mail article failed to prompt any authorities to take any action   Blue Motor Finance are wrong to tell you that they have to investigate first.  The dealer has no right to insist upon a repair as you have reacted and asserted your rights within 30 days of purchase.   You will have to get tough with Blue Motor and we will help you.  
    • Singapore sees its traditional rag and bone collectors as key to its sustainability plans. View the full article
    • its an if not they def will.   then snotty letter time
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

Indirect Discrimination or just plain drunk?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1651 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If a pub bars a person for making calls to the police and threatening suicide - would it be indirect discrimination to ban them (disability/mental health is a protective characteristic)

 

Or could pub argue the fella was drunk and they were banning him for that.

 

Would a ban for such an incident be disproprtionate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

^ yep. I agree, you can't ban who you like....on the mental health issues or odd behaviour eg tourettes what might seem anti-social could be quirk someone can't control. Or with kids bad behaviour excused if it's ASD or whatever.

 

Yep, people may have depression but surely that doesn't give green light to make a scene in a pub? Anyway doesn't booze make people depressed?

Link to post
Share on other sites
No they can't nor have they been able to for a number of years since anti-dicrimination legistlation[/Quote]

 

Not true

 

The Licencee has absolute discretion over who is permitted on the premises and who is not. This overrides any interpretation of the Equality Act, providing that the reason for the exclusion is not the protected characteristic in itself

 

In this situation, the wish to exclude is not BECAUSE the individual has a mental illness, but due to the fact that the person with the illness causes trouble for the licenced premises which is beyond what any reasonable person might deem 'reasonable'

 

Barring somebody with a tic would be unreasonable, barring somebody whose illness caused them to be violent towards other customers would most likely be considered reasonable. Taking things to extremes, if a mentally ill customer habitually tried to harm others, or smashed the place up whenever he or she came into the pub, would it be 'discriminatory' to refuse entry? No, the law would not stand against the pub owner and the same would apply here.

 

Serving a customer when they are drunk is an offence in itself irrespective of mental state, and the customer can be asked to leave. Refusing entry where the customer makes nuisance phone calls from the premises despite requests to stop, and especially if concern was expressed that the suicide threats might be genuine would also be acceptable. In the case of the calls to police this may lead to a lack of response in a genuine situation where harm is being done, and regarding the suicide threats that is a matter for other agencies.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
No they can't nor have they been able to for a number of years since anti-dicrimination legistlation.

 

Im amazed, I would have thought that being a nuisance would be the only reason needed to bar anyone, many may accuse them of being discriminatory, but I would imagine have great difficulty proving it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...