Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

New phone charger burst into flames and damaged my bedroom


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2684 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

purchased a new phone from car phone warehouse 3 weeks ago. paid cash for the product.

 

 

last tuesday the charger burst into flames .

no one was present in the house so no injuries occured .

bedroom suffered smoke damage to the walls celings also most items in the room not recoverable.

bedroom unable to be used.

 

 

i have not claimed on my insurance due to the fact i have no contents only buildings

the bit i have to pay is about £1400 of the claim

i can imagine the cost of cleaning and redecoration and replacement of the carpet will be about £2k.

beds and wardrobes and tv not covered on buildings insurance

i will add a fire investigation has confirmed the cause of the fire was the phone charger.

 

 

carphone warehouse showed no real interest trying to resolve this matter with microsoft who own nokia.

 

 

problem i face who do i claim against

how long should i wait before i clear the room out

what does my claim come under the law that covers this mess.

 

 

i have three people in 1 bedroom so this can no longer continue so must move this along perhaps help advice guidence would help please

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I have been through a similar with Carphone,

you bought phone at their store therefore your contract is with them.

 

 

They will tell you different and make up rubbish but, in the end I emailed the Managing Director of the group and things quickly began to get smoothed out in my favour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the supplier of the telephone and the charger are the people that you should hold responsible. In that case it seems to be carphone warehouse.

 

Be meticulous about taking photographs of everything – all damage. Be meticulous about making a detailed written record of all damage and all quotations for repairs. In the first instance, you should try to put in bills for new replacements of everything but if they decide to make an issue of it and say that you should only be entitled to a second-hand value, then that is not an unreasonable position but you should find high values for second-hand replacements.

In particular, you need a written report about the cause of the damage – the charger. You say that the fire investigation has already confirmed that this is the case. You need to get it in writing – and a reference number so that carphone warehouse can contact them if they want.

 

Don't be fobbed off for instance by anyone who says will you will have to claim form the carphone warehouse insurer. That would be untrue. Your issue is with carphone warehouse directly. If they want to claim from their insurer then that is up to them. In particular, be very careful about delays. Apart from anything else, it is clear that the item is defective and you should immediately assert your short-term right to reject by contacting them in writing and pointing out that because you are within the 30 day period after purchase, you are rejecting the whole thing – charger and telephone and that you want a refund or replacement – that's up to you. Make sure that you send this letter off to them by recorded delivery and keep copies.

 

You want rapid reactions from carphone warehouse and if you get any sense that they are delaying or that they're trying to fudge the issue then come back here.

 

Keep a close tally of all expenses you are put to on this such as any alternative accommodation or any problems with the other people who are sharing the accommodation with you – your landlord.

 

When you write to carphone warehouse about the damage et cetera make sure that they are fully in the picture about the entire situation so they cannot later on say well they only responsible fair your expenses and not the expenses which are incurred by flatmates and so forth. They should be responsible for anything which is a direct result of the defective charger catching fire and this could easily mean the cost of alternative accommodation or replacement or repairs for anybody else's property which has been affected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add, in your letter to carphone warehouse – which you should be sending off tomorrow morning, warned them that you will be clearing out the room and that some items may be moved and even no longer available for inspection. Tell them that you will attempt to keep items and store them into necessary but the you need to get your life back on track. Therefore, that you are inviting them to arrange inspection and they should make rapid arrangements to inspect and to assess and to evaluate as quickly as possible. Give them a deadline – say seven days – and tell them that after that time you will be making your own arrangements to repair any damage or to replace any items that you will be holding them responsible. Tell them that if they do not inspect the premises quickly then you will consider that they will be unable to complain or to argue about the value of damage later on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Buildings Insurance will cover fire damage to walls, ceilings, any fitted items such as light fittings. Also if you have any legal cover on the Buildings cover, they might help you.

 

In regard to the faulty item causing a fire, there should be an official report made to Trading Standards or other body that have a legal responsibility in regard to consumer safety. If enough people report a problem, then products can be withdrawn from sale.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

just had this reply of nokia microsoft

 

Hi Evan,

 

Thank you for your recent contact to Microsoft Customer Support. We received information regarding an issue you were having with a Nokia 130 charger. We take these claims very seriously and want to make sure we can get this resolved for you.

 

My name is Eric and I am reaching out to you from the Microsoft corporate offices in regards to the issue you reported. I was passed over the pictures that you provided of the damage along with the full chat and case notes on what happened. I wanted to let you know that we are reviewing everything with our engineer team to determine the next steps. Please continue to leave the scene as-is, and as soon as I hear back (should be within 24-48 hours), I will let you know what we need to do to move forward.

 

If you have any questions about this, please let me know by replying to this email.

 

Thank you,

 

Eric

 

Global Escalation Services

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i have read the post

i have tried ringing them but tell me to call back later

 

 

i spoke with a manager today in a carphone shop

they said it was nokia

sorry to say im not sure what to do my heads spinning

 

 

im under stress from the kids about lack of sleeping areas lost clothes ect

the house is a family mortgaged home 3 bed terraced .

 

 

i feel at the moment a walking corpse thank you for your help needed

 

I wanted to send you a quick follow-up on your case.

 

The engineers are still reviewing the pictures you provided and the notes about the issue to determine what the appropriate next steps are for us to investigate the issue for you.

 

At this time, I would ask that you continue to leave the scene as-is.

 

Once I have more information to provide, I will let you know.

 

Thank you,

 

Eric

Link to post
Share on other sites

Issue

MS

Microsoft Customer Support

Reply|

Today, 15:39

You

Service Request

 

Hi Evan,

 

I wanted to send you a quick follow-up on your case.

The engineers are still reviewing the pictures you provided and the notes about the issue to determine what the appropriate next steps are for us to investigate the issue for you.

 

 

At this time, I would ask that you continue to leave the scene as-is.

 

 

Once I have more information to provide, I will let you know.

 

Thank you,

 

Eric

Link to post
Share on other sites

Email him back and say please give me your company bank details so I can get both my children and myself temporary accommodation at local hotel, can you please provide further funding so that I may replace both children's and my clothing lost as a result of the fire caused by your company.s device.

Link to post
Share on other sites

we live in cleethorpes north east lincs i get the feeling we have delaying tatics here

 

i have informed carphone warehouse of the situation with the phone charger.

 

 

this morning microsoft are sending their investigators into look and examine the damage at my address caused by this nokia phone charger.

 

 

i understand they will not be acting in my best intrests but their clients microsoft .

 

 

im told i can put questions to them.

 

 

what do i need to allow them to do and what do i not allow them to do .

 

 

adivice helpfull please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let them in after checking id, let them take pictures of the damage.

 

Keep a recorder in your pocket in case they say something and then report something else.

 

If they want to take anything away for examination (phone, charger, etc.) ask for a receipt and take pictures of the items just before they take them away.

 

Offer them a cuppa and you'll be fine.

 

Last thing Microsoft wants is a recall on Nokia phones.

 

I bet they will come back to you saying that this was a one off fault and pay for the damage and even some compensation for the inconvenience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are checking all the house downstairs and upstairs every room taking photos everywhere

 

 

just took pictures of my fuse box even took it to bits unscrewed this .

 

 

no qualified electrician never even switched the supply off .

 

 

going through our bedrooms taking photos of every room

every bedroom with his camera

not yet looked at the effected areas the back bedroom

 

 

he is employed by legal firm cms and the company doing this is burgoynes fire investigators

god knows what is happening

Link to post
Share on other sites

he has left the building

he states he cannot divulge his opinion on how the fire started as that is client confidentiality we are not his clients.

 

 

said im better refering to the fire investigators report .

 

 

we will not get a copy of the report

we will not get copy of the pictures taken

we shall not hear from them again .

 

 

so where do we go with this matter

 

 

what is our next move

Link to post
Share on other sites

In your original post you said that an investigation found the charger to be the cause of the fire.

 

Whoever did this investigation must have done a report.

 

As warrenbuffet suggested, get a copy of the report.

 

IMO Microsoft will pay you off to close the matter without having to go through expensive tests and recalls on millions of devices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...