Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Ade,   Stop speaking to them by phone and keep contact in writing only, which you've said you prefer.   Send TT a SAR by post immediately. The data you get back should enable you to see what they think you owe, and how it's made up.   Also write to BW Legal confirming you dispute the alleged debt owed to TT and have written to TT seeking data, so BWL must stop demands until TT have replied to the SAR you've sent them.
    • Please do although obviously I don’t know the facts from your side but at least I can tell you how much of a cut and paste job it is.
    • Please check back for a full reply tomorrow. However, it would help if you would introduce pergo spaces into a story full stop it's very long and especially for people with small screens it's very difficult to follow when it is so compacted.   I think this straight has become rather confused because of the third party account which we received at the outset. I think it will probably be helpful if you could repost your story but on a new thread and more openly spaced please.   Then we can start to have a closer look at it. However, as I've already suggested, I think there are two issues. The question of your liability in the accident and the problem of how you have been persuaded to take a rental car at such a high rate.    I would suggest that you hold off telephoneing anyone until we have had a closer look.before you do anything on the telephone. You have obviously had some very important conversations but you don't have any evidence of them. Although the other side may say that they have recorded them, you you may find it difficult to get hold of those recordings if in fact those recordings incriminate them in any way. for instance if they have promised you that you don't have to pay anything for the hire car, that would be an extremely useful conversation to have but you may find that it is difficult to get hold of.   please start a new thread it will be much easier to continue from there                                
    • When I sadly lost my job a while back, i reportd it immpediately to DWP as you are supposed to, but didnt realise at the time that the day I reported to them was the day before I was paid out for the last month. I was actually paid extra whem I left as it was cheaper than redundancy fort the business and at the time it was a good financial move (so I thought).   I was paid on Fri 26th Jan, they paid me out 2 months in one go. I reported to DWP on the 22nd of Han that I was made unemployed, had the letters and evidence. As they spun the story, because of their assesment dates and that, my first payment was on the 1st May and reassured that it works the other way around. That when work starts again, if I dont actually receive money from the company during the assesment period, there wont be an issue as it balances up.   Can I believe this or was it another spun story? I'm concerned that as I'll be paid monthly, (Starting on the 15th paid on the last day of the month), assment ends on the 22nd. Tha they'll take that money into consideration.   I'm just concerned due to the disparity it would cause between 4 odd months I endured with zero income because of how their system works and whatever they ahe in place to counter at this end of the claim.   Anywa, it's just awonder.   Cheers,   Ade    
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies
  • Recommended Topics

Link/Kearns Claimform - MBNA card debt - +6YRS old***Claim Discontinued***


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 778 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Been a while since I've been on here.

 

Have received a letter before action from Kearns on behalf of link financial for an old MBNA credit card debt.

The debt is circa 2007.

I haven't been chased on this or had any correspondence on this or made any payments on this for over 6 years for sure.

I have attached a copy of the letter.

Please advise course of action?

 

If I am honest, I have moved address and Link have recently chased me for another one and I feel they are phishing on this one as I basically disappeared for 6 years.

 

Letter attached for advice.

 

Thanks!

20161119_123458.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Send statute barred letter. They might not be aware of last payment date and might just issue a court claim in ignorance. Saves you time in dealing with a court claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
Best way to go about this by sending a CCA first? And if so, should I send to MBNA, link financial or Kearns?

 

If you are sure about SB status then send that letter.

 

If not sure, send CCA.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?405-Debt-Collection

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

its aphishing trip - ignore

so you've had previous letters then?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had previous letters from link before yes about an Egg loan.

This was stayed in court as they couldn't respond to CCA,

 

 

now they've started to send letters about it again,

as I have moved address I didn't respond because they were always phishing letters and nothing ever mentioned about the court case being reopened. It was stayed in around 2010 at an old address of mine.

 

 

Then out of nowhere, this one turns up, I need to double check but am 99.9% sure this MBNA is S/B so here is my dilemma.

 

Do I respond with either CCA or S/B OR do I ignore

because they've never ever had any confirmation of my new address from me or anyone.

I feel like they are trying to test the waters with this letter from Kearns to get me to react one way or the other.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My personal view is that you ignore a letter before action because you are not bothered about a court claim, as you can and will defend it.

 

But if you received a court claim,

you would send a CCA anyway,

so given that you are unsure about SB status,

you might decide to send the CCA now.

 

 

There is nothing stopping you mentining in the request letter that you believe the matter is statute barred and they should check when a last payment was received on the account.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, my problem here is that I then confirm to them that I do actually live at this address.

And they then come at me for other things too.

 

I can get the information I need on Monday that will confirm the last date of payment made on this particular debt as I was actually using payplan previously to manage it. So saving grace is I should be able.to get all info without contacting them.

 

What I don't want to do is have to interact with these tricksters if I don't have to.

I'm pretty sure it's phishing and that they know the game they're playing.

Trying to get me to come out of the woodwork so to speak.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that is better that them thinking you might live at your previous address due to no reply and they send the court claim to previous address, getting a default CCJ which you then have to try to set aside,

 

But if you can find out last payment date, do that first. You can't really hide, but don't give DCA's reason to get sneeky default CCJ's using an old address. They somehow can't trace you or get no reply, so they send court claim to previous address.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

if this IS subject to an old stayed claim then that claim for SB purposes can be ignored

so SB will run from the last payment date BEFORE that stayed case, thus well more than 6yrs ago..

 

 

if its statute barred, then its rather a stupid idea sending a CCA request

as that's blowing your SB theory out the water

doesn't matter if the owner of the debt holds or not enforceable paperwork...its STILL SB'd!!

 

 

now as for running away from your previous creditors and not telling them where you are now

that's is very stupid too..

 

 

as you WILL get CCJ's to your old address EVEN IF the debts ARE SB'd as nothing would be checked and the judgement would be rubberstamped.

 

 

I can see you are old hat here and moved in a crowd that years ago advocated those types of silly things...not today thankfully.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to point 1 + 2. Thanks, much appreciated.

 

Points 3+4 that's not exactly the case, but you make valid points and I see where you're coming from.

 

I'll have more info Monday and hopefully won't be as "stupid" anymore:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning All,

 

This morning I have spoken with Payplan and obtained the information I need so that a decision can be made on the best way to move forward with this without speculating.

 

The fact IS - this is not S/B. The last payment date to Link Financial was 2nd June 2011. This would make the S/B date 3rd June 2017.

 

I Never once received a notice of assignment from MBNA, but I received a notice of assignment from Link in December 2008 informing me that they had been assigned this account.

 

I then forwarded this letter to Payplan whom were dealing with MBNA directly originally with an agreement and then changed the agreement over to Link Financial.

 

I have never CCA'd this or anything at all, so now I am unsure what to do and where to go on this.

 

Any advice would be appreciated as for the best thing to do.

 

Many thanks

 

BonM

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't confirm you are at a new address by responding, then in theory they could send a court claim to your previous address, as that would be in order. Unless it is forwarded onto you, then they would get a CCJ by default and no doubt chase to your new address.

 

If i had received a letter before action, i would have to think there was reasonable chance of a court claim being issued and i would not want the hassle in defending. I might therefore decide to send a CCA request to whoever owned the debt, with a copy to their Solicitors chasing. If they then can't get hold of the original CCA, they can really issue a court claim to enforce the debt. This is on the basis that the CCA was originally taken out before April 2007.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you mean that the CCA was originally taken out before April 2007?

 

I have not done a CCA on this account, so there would not have been a CCA previously. The Debt would definitely have been taken out 2006 - 2007 circa. But I do not know the exact date it was some time ago now.

 

SO, should I send the CCA request to Link and and copy reference to Kearns too? Is that the best way forward and wait to see what happens?

 

ok I have misunderstood.

I have now re read and see what you are saying.

 

 

Should I contact MBNA by phone and find out when I took out the original agreement before sending the CCA request to Link?

 

What difference would it make if I took out the agreement prior to April 2007?

 

Thanks

 

Bon M

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Consumer Credit Act was amended with effect from April 2007.

 

 

If the credit account with MBNA was taken out before April 2007, they need the original credit agreement you signed or a copy of it, to enforce the debt in court, IF you defended any claim.

 

If you took out the MBNA account after April 2007, they don't need the original agreement or a copy of it to enforce in court.

 

Send the CCA request to Link and send a copy to Kearns so they know you have made the request.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

righth so we now know this is NOT the old EGG debt with the old failed court claim?

its an MBNA card they have acquired?

 

 

if this is the case

I would be sending a CCA request anyway

as it serves 2 purposes

puts them to strict proof

tells them of your new address

do that with any other debts that are in the same boat too!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok last piece of information.

 

The account was originally opened on 25th August 2006. So we know that unless I receive the original credit agreement, this is not enforceable?

 

@DX - yes this is MBNA.

 

I will send the CCA request, I will post up a copy of the letter I have drafted for review, just to make sure I have it correct, prior to sending.

 

Thanks guys for your help so far.

 

BonM

 

oh wow, I have just gone through my files and on the 15th April 2010 I had already sent a CCA to Link Financial regarding this. It turns out they have never responded.

 

I have posted below the letter I sent. Please let me know how I should proceed.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:− Link Financial acc no deleted

[template removed] - dx

BonM

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could send Kearns a copy warning them that their client Link is still not in compliance with the CCA request sent in 2010 and that they should inform Link that they need to comply.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

just sent plink another CCA request

don't worry about kearns

next bloke at the same desk in a diff coloured skirt

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am curious to know, if I send another CCA request.

 

 

Does this restart the 6 year process all over again,

given the fact that I sent the last CCA request 6 years and they did not respond, which is why I stopped paying them.

 

 

If it does, surely that is unfair, given that they didn't respond 6 years ago and I feel they are phishing and using this to try to get me to react. If you say I should send it anyway, I will. But I am curious as to know if it resets and the 6 years starts again from now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't reset anything

You need to protect against a backdoor CCJ to an old address

As you have not told them it in writing

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh ok DX, so should I not put my address on the letter?.... How would they know where to send the CCA info (assuming they have it)

 

Sorry this is the part I am confused about. Could you help me understand how / when / under which circumstances would the 6 years start again then?

 

Thanks so much

 

BonM

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...