Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Very want to Default me - even though in an arrangement - please help


moneydragon
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2712 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Due to partners ill health and not entitled to any benefits - that's another issue,

 

So with just one wage I have set up some agreements with my creditors and for the past 12 months have been honouring the payments. However, I have just received a default from very demanding £450 by the 28th which I simply cannot afford.

 

It states that if I don't pay by that date then they will demand full payment of £650.

 

Please help as I am worried that they will then just issue me with a ccj.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I expect that DX will be along later to give you some more specific advice. However, I think that you will need to give us more information about all of the debts. Who are they with, when where they incurred and so forth. In respect of the demand from Very, did you have an agreement with them or has this come out of the blue?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply bank fodder. I have two other debts both credit cards and very all agreed last year after submitting an income sheet to a payment plan which I have been honouring each month. Last month I received a letter from very wanting payment which I went back and said that my circumstances remained the same. Heard nothing until this default arrived.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can't just issue a ccj when they issue a default. There's a whole lengthy procedure they have to follow

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I understand that you entered into an agreement with Very by which they would accept instalments. You have stuck to the agreement but despite this, they are now trying to renege on the agreement with a demand for a lump sum payment and a threat to pursue for the total. Is this correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please have a look at this http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?426145-CONC-7.12-Lenders-responsibilities-in-relation-to-debt-including-DMPs

 

I think that you need to find out the definition of a "debt management plan". Your problem find it is in the CONC regulations. You are entitled to do on your own behalf. You don't need to do it through some third-party organisation.

 

It seems to me that you should then call Very's attention to the fact that you are involved in a debt management plan and they have agreed to take part and if they now refuse to continue engaging on it, they will most likely wreck the plan.

 

Tell them that if they refuse to cooperate then you will consider that they are in breach of their statutory FCA regulations under CONC, particularly 7.12 and that you will make a complaint about them and also you will rely on the FCA regulations as part of a defence and also a counterclaim if they carry out their threat to pursue you for the total.

 

Tell them that you want a proper response or else you will begin a formal complaint to the regulatory authorities.

 

We'll see if that makes any difference to their attitude. Please keep us informed. This would be the first time that this approach has been tried and I would be very interested to see how it works.

 

Apart from that, I hope that DX or someone else will come along and discuss with you the validity or otherwise of your debts. Do you know if any of these alleged debts are comprised of charges at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would guess that this is in preparation to them selling the debt on.

 

 

so equals something dodgy about it one way or another.

 

 

I assume the debt is ofcourse showing on your credit file?

 

 

when did you first take all this credit out please..

 

 

as advised more details.

 

 

very are quite entitled to default you sadly even if you are in an arrangement.

you are not paying the required payments.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I opened an account with Very about 4 years ago.

 

 

Whilst I accept they are entitled to default me,

it was their tone and demand for £450 without acknowledging the arrangement and failing that full payment of £650 that has thrown me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes – they are entitled to default you. However, I think it would be very difficult for them to change the instalment plan – or at least to vary it significantly. Also, I think that in your letter to them you ought to point out to them that if they sell the debt on, that they are obliged to sell it subject to the existing instalment plan and that you will flag this up to whoever might own the debt in the future and that you have already warned them about their behaviour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just checked my account online and I am not paying interest.

 

 

I have also noticed that there is an e-letter with a heading

"please contact Nationwide Debt Recovery.

 

 

At the moment I am unable to open as it keeps saying pdf download unsuccessful and I have the app installed

Link to post
Share on other sites

NDR are very [shop directs] fake internal DCA

so I wouldn't worry too much.

 

 

as the account is from 4yrs ago itll be enforceable

but there might well be penalty charges?

 

 

have you all the statements?

 

 

have you checked your credit file?

I suggest this is already defaulted ?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...