Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Lastly, I will go to the site to get updated images, but from google earth, you can see from the pictures the entrance states it is for the hotel parking, which I follwed instructions and gave my details to the hotel. Where I think my car was parked (it was that long ago I'm not exactly sure) there are signs on the opposite wall, but it was 12.30am, pitch black and they could not be seen.
    • I was planning on collecting up other court cases they have lost, to refer to as part of my evidence, I'm not sure if this is worth doing or could just confuse matters? But there seem to be many where the judge has ruled against them because of confusing and not clearly displayed signage, trespass, as well as their charge being £100, which is more than the Bevis case said was reasonable.    A quick search found this article as one example KBT cornwall lose case article.pdf
    • OK, I will do now. I did look to black out certain things, but I was not sure what I should and should not redact and there was nothing on there that was personal enough for me to be concerned with being made public. So I am happy for all to view, but if you are kind enough to redact what is needed as per the forum rules, that would be amazing. Armtrak Defence documents_compressed.pdf
    • yes but have the landowner paid this years contract fee. no evidence they have in the ws. pop it back up now if you wish. the forum is quiet i'll redact it for you so we have the info.   dx  
    • Thank you all so much for taking the time to comment and help, I really do appreciate it.   Just to elaborate a bit more on the background, just because my lack of knowledge of the process might mean I've actually done things along the way that I did not know what they were and so hadn't mention it.    When they decided to go to court, I was offered mediation, which I took. I offered to pay the reduced rate, just to make it go away, but insisted it was not an admission of guilt, it was a goodwill gesture to save us all the effort of court. They refused and wanted £250.    A court date was set, but in Leeds, then a couple weeks later I received another letter saying it had been moved to London.   I was not aware I had any say in which court it would be held at, but I now understand i have good reason to request it is moved to a local one to me, which is also local to the offending place, I will call the court tomorrow and explain that. But so far I have only been told what is happening, I've not been given the choice for anything.   They seem to be going down the route of a contract breach, not trespass which is interesting. There is a document in the evidence which has the agreement between themselves which I assumed meant they can pursue me.    I am going to visit the site again shortly, at midnight the time of the offence and take pictures to build a case file of the route I took to enter the car park, how it is in the hotel grounds and no signs can be seen.    Am I right in saying, the fact they do not actually have any pictures of my car in the location they say it was in, just because all of the pictures they have were at 12/30am and it was pitch black, I am going to say my car was parked correctly in the hotel side, not on their land and it is then up to them to prove otherwise, which they are not able to do, because the burden of proof lies with the claimant I think?
  • Our picks

Thewigster

Misread Sign and Napier FCN received - civic drive ipswich

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1063 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi Peeps

other day i received a charge notice after parking at a napier car park in civic drive ipswich .

 

Dad is a blue badge holder .

 

I checked the board but due to the height and my not so perfect eye sight i misread the line "blue badge holders are not exempt from these charges" as " blue bagde holders ARE exempt from these charges .

 

whats the likelyhood of a sucessful appeal on this one ?

 

thanks in advance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

If this was a windscreen ticket, do nothing until the Notice to Keeper has arrived. This should be between 29 and 56 days after the event.


If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi,

If this was a windscreen ticket, do nothing until the Notice to Keeper has arrived. This should be between 29 and 56 days after the event.

 

Yep ticket in a nice clear packet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

then wait for the NTK, it is probably not POFA compliant so you will then be able to tell them to get stuffed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

should i appeal online then or wait for NTK First ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as post 4

dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning everyone hope a pleasant christmas was had by all. Just to update on this I've received NTK can I ask for a little help with POFA compliancy ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a read around. This is a self help site. There are plenty of threads that deal with your exact issue. If you get stuck, show us what you found and your interpretation and we can advise


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

scan it up to pdf please

follow upload


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

attachment rotated and converted to pdf


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
attachment rotated and converted to pdf

 

Thanks for your help. Not very good with technology

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

This should have been done at the start of this thread.

 

Can you give us the answers to this post.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket-(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

Was the disabled badge prominently shown.


If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One more thing, The IPC code of practice state.

 

Under the Equality Act 2010 it is your duty to make “reasonable adjustments” to assist

disabled people to use any services you provide. It is incumbent on operators to

determine what is necessary on their individual sites. Adjustments could include

lowered pay and display meters, lowered signage and wider parking bays marked

specifcally for disabled drivers

 

Were there lowered signs?


If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi

This should have been done at the start of this thread.

 

Can you give us the answers to this post.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket-(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

Was the disabled badge prominently shown.

Yes both parts to it. Id card and time card

 

One more thing, The IPC code of practice state.

 

 

 

Were there lowered signs?

 

No all at the same height

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter as you will get rejected by Napier anyway. Any appeal to the IAS will also result in a rejection as they are so biased, it's untrue.

 

What is likely to happen is that you will get more begging letters but nothing of any concern. In the 9 months to September 16, Napier issued just over 10.5k tickets nd took court action once. I suspect they lost that case as if they had won, tey would have been more confident on taking more to court.

 

As I see it, I would sit on my hands and the only time to do anything is if a Letter Before Action (LBA) or a court claim arrives.


If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, NTK is POFA compliant so any argument will be over the signage.

 

You say that you misread it,

this leads to the questions of how big were the signs and how big was the small print?

 

Also were the signs at the entrance to the car park different to the signs scattered about and what does the blurb on the ticket machine say?

 

To form a contract at the outset the signage must have all of the details of the contract offered and the signs must essentially all be the same.

 

The wording on the ticket machine, if different to the signage is the bit that offers the contract and is only entered into when you put your money in the machine.

 

If you dont feed the meter and the signs say "see machine for conditions" or the like then if you ignore them you are trespassing and that is not a contractual matter with the parking co.

 

by misreading the signage you havent actualy entered into a contract becasue you didnt pay unless the signs have the same wording as the machine.

 

Would I appeal?

Not without revisiting the site and photographing the signs and pay meter and after that only to say that no contract formed and they can get tae the back of the bus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply,

 

I would as you say have to revisit as I never bought a ticket after reading the sign.

 

But what your saying is that unless there is a sign identical to the one I read then no contract was formed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no,

I am saying that the sign may not be a contract but an invitation to treat

and that allows you to not have to accept its terms but to make other enquiries or considerations.

Once you put money into the machine the contract is formed but uo to that point you havent agreed to anything.

 

The wording of the signage then becomes vital to knowing what you are being offered and whether you accet it or not,

 

 

the critical thing is that you dont have to accept it but can still park there with the risk of being a trespasser.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ill go down in the week and get some photos of the signage , see what you think

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Attached some pics of the signs today. If you imagine I'm 6ft tall and I had to point the camera to the sky to take them

20170105_142942.jpg

20170105_143010.jpg

20170105_143109.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the signs contain the information needed

but as you say, they are a sod to read so can you estimate their height above the ground?

I presume the one next to the ticket machine is the same wording as the others.

 

Can you also tell us how long the co has been running this car park and who owns the land?

The former will help regarding whether they have planning permission for their signs and if they dont they are breaking the law.

 

 

Criminal activity=no contract can be formed.

If a recent enterprise the PP will be listed on the council planning portal,

most councils have these but some only go back a couple of years for online searches so you may have to ask them.

 

 

For the second point there is an argument about whether the size and colour of the writing can lead to condusion or problems reading and understanding the contract offered (consideration and acceptance).

 

 

This is always something that is subjective and no-one can sat that such and such is OK but so and so isnt so the planning matter will be the killer for them

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would estimate the bottom of the sign must be 7ft from ground level. As I said I'm 6ft and I can stand comfortably under it. Yes the signage by the machine is identical but in all honesty I don't think the lettering on that is big enough either.

 

Regarding how long they have been there I don't know. The car park used to be used as a market a few years ago and was owned by wolsey theatre. Don't know if the sold it or they lease it to napier? ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

then look at the planning portal and see it it is listed.

 

 

It is usual for parking co's to claim deemed consent but if you read what is allowed under deemed consent their signs dont fit with any of it so express consent needed.

 

Ultimately this is an easier argument but like the wording on a sign offering a contract it is all down to how someone else interprets it and you can bet that whoever considers this wont be an expert on planning and contract law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

done some research tonight and found this . not sure i understand how a place can be up and running and trading as a business when the planning is still pending ?

planning.docx.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...