Jump to content


Excel PCN 2012 - now BW Legal letter - advice required please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1839 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, first post and looking for advice/plan of attack.

 

Parking Notice relates back to 15 May 2012. I was registered keeper but not using the vehicle at the time (I was in bed after a night shift!)

 

The car park in question is free for 1 hour and no option to pay. The notice relates to an over stay.

 

The original paperwork from June 2012 showed photo evidence of the vehicle, but no image of the driver. I don't have this anymore. binned it 6 months ago thinking this had gone away.

 

BW Legal are now involved and I've sent them one denial letter. I did state I was going to complain to the CSA and SRA but got sidetracked and didn't get round to it.

 

BW have responded with 2 letters.

 

1 dated 31 Oct. The main point being

 

"We can confirm that our client does not intend to rely upon the Protection of Freedom Act 2012. as such we do not accept your assertions regarding payment.

 

In the absence of driver details we are instructed to recover the suns due from you".

 

The second letter looks to be a bog standard Final Notice letter dated 2 November.

 

They have tried to call me once, but ignored it.

 

 

Would be grateful for advice on my next actions and pointers to any CSA and SRA templates if needed.

 

In this case, I genuinely wasn't the driver!!!!

 

Thanks in advance

Edited by Surfinjim
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG.

PoFA is not relevant in this case as it was before the Act came into force so you are under no obligation to name the driver and they are prohibited from chasing the keeper on the assumption they were the driver.

 

I have seen a few of these recently and BWL are trying their luck with old cases in the hope they get someone to pay up.

 

As you have sent them one letter, I suggest you continue ignoring them unless a letter properly stating Letter Before Action or court papers turn up

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait for the parking guys to pop in.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

 

 

 

GEMHL Settled

Barclaycard Settled

A & L SETTLED IN FULL :lol:

Spml Reluctantly withdrawn

Blackhorse pre 31-7-06 Demand removal sent 23 8 06. ICO ordered removal jan 2007....REMOVED:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait for the parking guys to pop in.

 

What was you saying on the other thread about being Fast Fingered Freddie. :lol:

 

Sorry OP

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG.

PoFA is not relevant in this case as it was before the Act came into force so you are under no obligation to name the driver and they are prohibited from chasing the keeper on the assumption they were the driver.

 

I have seen a few of these recently and BWL are trying their luck with old cases in the hope they get someone to pay up.

 

As you have sent them one letter, I suggest you continue ignoring them unless a letter properly stating Letter Before Action or court papers turn up

 

I was going to reply back and tell them my original letter stood and to stop harassing me. The letters to CSA and SRA I've seen on the t'internet but can't find now when I want to use them.

 

Thanks for the reassurance though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

forgot to say, you have siad your piece and that can be used against them if they are stupid enough to want to take it further. they wont because one of the parking world's greatest solicitors tried that and used Elliot v Loake as case precedent to claim keeper ad driver the same and were laughted out of court will a full costs order for being malicious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What was you saying on the other thread about being Fast Fingered Freddie. :lol:

 

Sorry OP

 

Bugger!!

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

 

 

 

GEMHL Settled

Barclaycard Settled

A & L SETTLED IN FULL :lol:

Spml Reluctantly withdrawn

Blackhorse pre 31-7-06 Demand removal sent 23 8 06. ICO ordered removal jan 2007....REMOVED:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't write any more nor complain..

Await poss claumform

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...