Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
    • You left the PCN number showing, but no worries, I've redacted it. Euro Car parks are very well known to us.  I've just skimmed through the titles of the latest 100 cases we have with them (I gave up after 100) and, despite all their bluster and threats, in not one have they taken the Cagger to court. You stayed there for 2 hours &:45 minutes.  I'm guessing the limit is 2 hours and 30 minutes, right?  
    • If the claimant fails to draft directions the court can order a Case Management Hearing to set them but normally in Fast Track claims the claimant sets the directions...Unlike small claims track which are always set the court.
    • Not Evris offer, the court offers mediation service.   All claims proceed to hearing if mediation fails /not happen.   Why do you not wish to attend in person to stand your claim ?     Absolutely you must comply with the courts directions or your claim risks being struck out. Preparation for a hearing should happen irrespective of mediation.   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460613-suing-a-parcel-delivery-company-when-you-dont-have-a-direct-contract-with-them-–-third-party-rights-copy-of-judgment-available/#comment-5255007   Andy  
    • LPA.  (I'm fighting insolvency due to all the stuff that he and lender have done).  He appointed estate agents - (changed several times). Disclosure shows he was originally appointed for a specific reason (3m after repo) : using his powers as acting for leaseholder to serve notice on freeholders (to grab fh).  There was interest from 3 potential buyers. He chose one whose offer depended on a positive result of the notice.  Disc also shows he'd taken counsel advice - which was 'he'd fail'.  He'd simultaneously asked to resign as his job (of serving notice) was done and he'd found a buyer.  Lender asked him to stay on to assign notice to the buyer.  Notice failed, buyer didn't buy.  So receiver stayed.  There was 1 buyer who wanted to proceed w/o fh but receiver/ lender wasted 1y trying to get rid of them!  Disc shows why. But I didn't know why at the time. In later months Lender voiced getting rid of receiver. Various reasons - including cost.  But there's a contradiction/ irony: as I've seen an email (of 4y ago) which shows the receiver telling lender not to incur significant costs and to minimize receiver costs.    Yet lender then asked him to serve another notice - again counsel advice indicated 'he'd fail'.  And he did fail.  But wasted 3y trying and incurred huge legal costs - lender trying to pass on to me. Lender interfered - said wanted to do works.  Receiver should have said no.  But disc. shows he agreed to step aside to let them do the works - on proviso lender would discuss potential costs first (they didn't), works wouldn't take long (took 15m), and lender would hold interest (they didn't) (this last point is crucial for me now - as I need to know if I can argue that all interest beyond this point shouldnt be allowed?)   I need to check receiver witness statement in litigation with freeholders to see exactly what he said about 'his position'. But I remember it being along the lines of - 'if the works increased the value of the property he didn't have a problem'.  Lender/ receiver real problems started at this point. The cost of works and 4y passage of time has meant there is no real increase in value. Lender (or receiver) didn't get any permissions (statutory or fh) (and didn't tell me) and just bulldozed the property to an empty shell.  The freeholders served notice on me as leaseholder for breach of covenants (strict no alterations).  The Lender stepped in (acting for me) to issue notice for relief of forfeiture - not the receiver.  That wasted 2y of litigation (3y if inc the works) and incurred huge costs (both sides).  Lender's aim was to do the works that every potential buyer balked at due to the lease restrictions.  Lender and receiver knew couldn't do works w/o fh permission. Lender did them anyway; receiver allowed.  Receiver remained appointed.  I'm arguing lender interfered in receiver duties.  Receiver should have just sold property 4-5y ago w/o allowing any works.  Almost 3y since works finished the property remains unsold (>5y from repo). The property looks brand new - but it was great before.  The lender spent a ton of money - hoping that would facilitate a quick sale.  But the money they spent and the years they have wasted has meant they had to increase sale price.  It's now completely overpriced.  And - of course - the same issues that put buyers off (before works) still exist.   The receiver has tried for 2y to assert the works increased value. But he is relying on agents estimates - which have proved highly speculative. (Usual trick of an agent to give a high value to get the business - and then tell seller to reduce when no-one buys.). And of course lender continues to accrue interest (despite 4y ago receiver saying pause interest). Lender tried to persuade receiver to use specific agent. Disc shows this agent was best friends with the lender's main investor in the property.  Before works this agent had valued it low.  After works this agent suggested a value 70% higher!  The lender persuaded receiver to sack one agent and instead use this agent.  No offers. (Price way too high).   Research has uncovered that this main investor has since died.  I guess his investment is part of probate? And his family want it back?    Disc shows the sacked agent had actually received a high offer 1y ago.  Receiver rejected it.  (thus I don't know if the buyer would have ever proceeded). He was relying on the high speculative valuation the agents had given him to pitch for the business. The agents were in a catch-22.  The receiver sacked them. Disc shows there has been 0 interest ever since (inc via new agent requested by lender). I don't think lender or receiver want all this to come out in public domain via a trial.  It will ruin their reputations. If I can't get an order for sale with lender - can I apply separately against receiver?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclays PPI and other charges


theformerdebtor
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2700 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

First of all, I want to say a big THANK YOU to all forum moderators and members that are always on, answering all of our threads and questions. Well done to all of you. This site is the most helpful of all.

 

I'm trying to claim back the PPI for my O/H from Barclays. The account was opened back in 2004.

I SAR Barclays already and I just received the pack thru the post. At a quick look, I found that there were more payments going out to Barclays from this account such as:

 

1. PPI

2. Unpaids out

3. Paid Referral

4. Account Fee - this suddenly appeared at one point in the statements without any changes in the account type, and the fee was gradually going up.

5. Interest charged

 

We still got a lot of stuff from back then, that was received from Barclays, but we couldn't find anything (like letters or even an account Ts and Cs or anything that bears any signature). Does anybody know if all these can be claimed back from Barclays along with PPI?

 

Thanks in advance

 

TFD

Give a man a gun and he'll rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he'll rob everyone!

 

 

The Bank:

 

An institution, where you can borrow money if you can present sufficient evidence, to prove that you don't need it !!!

 

 

The Banker:

 

A man, who will lend you an umbrella, but want it back as soon as it will start to rain !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

package account fees yes -

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?459427-Reclaim-Packaged-Current-Accounts-Deal-Fees

 

 

PPI yes

 

 

Paid Referral fees and the other charges

if outside of 6yrs - I doubt it.

 

 

see what slick132 says

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great. Thanks for your quick answer DX.

 

I'll wait for slick as well.

 

Thanks

 

TFD

Give a man a gun and he'll rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he'll rob everyone!

 

 

The Bank:

 

An institution, where you can borrow money if you can present sufficient evidence, to prove that you don't need it !!!

 

 

The Banker:

 

A man, who will lend you an umbrella, but want it back as soon as it will start to rain !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just found another one called "Reserve fee". Is over £20.

 

This one started back in 2009. Not a clue what this is either. It just popped out from one statement to another.

Give a man a gun and he'll rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he'll rob everyone!

 

 

The Bank:

 

An institution, where you can borrow money if you can present sufficient evidence, to prove that you don't need it !!!

 

 

The Banker:

 

A man, who will lend you an umbrella, but want it back as soon as it will start to rain !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi TFD,

 

PPI - YES and you should start a thread in the PPI forum on this.

 

Additions Fees - YES, particularly if they were charged without your knowledge or consent. This can be dealt with on your thread here.

 

Unpaids out; Paid Referral fee; Interest charged - I'd say NO to these.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi slick :-)

 

Thanks for your reply.

 

Sorry for not mentioning early, these are charges applied to a bank account that has O/D facility. So the charges were against O/D.

 

What about this "Reserved Fee" and there is something else that came out, "Guaranteed Fee". All these had nothing to do with interest applied. Interest was still applied to O/D.

 

Back in 2014 we received a letter simply headed " INTRODUCING NEW, SIMPLER OVERDRAFT CHARGES AND HELPFUL WAYS TO AVOID FEES" wich actually raised O/D interest over the roof.

Give a man a gun and he'll rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he'll rob everyone!

 

 

The Bank:

 

An institution, where you can borrow money if you can present sufficient evidence, to prove that you don't need it !!!

 

 

The Banker:

 

A man, who will lend you an umbrella, but want it back as soon as it will start to rain !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi TFD,

 

It makes no difference with the OD. In the main, default fees charged on a current a/c are not going to be repaid.

 

Barclays introduced their system of Reserve Fees back in 2009 after the OFT (since disbanded) started their big test case about bank current a/c fees. It was basically a new name for their old trick of caning customers when they could least afford it. But you're not going to get them back IMHO.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi slick

 

Thanks

 

So, so far this is what we can and what we cannot claim back.

 

 

1. PPI - YES

2. Unpaids out - NO

3. Paid Referral - NO

4. Account Fee - YES

5. Interest charged - NO

6. Reserve fee - NO

7. Guaranteed Fee -NO

 

With the PPI they sent us a letter and ask us to contact them about it. That's what actually make us to SAR them.

 

With regards to the "Account Fee" can I put it together with PPI on the same spread sheet (8% interest back)? Or there has to be a different spread sheet with the letter from the library attached?

 

 

Thanks

 

TFD

Give a man a gun and he'll rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he'll rob everyone!

 

 

The Bank:

 

An institution, where you can borrow money if you can present sufficient evidence, to prove that you don't need it !!!

 

 

The Banker:

 

A man, who will lend you an umbrella, but want it back as soon as it will start to rain !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No keep the PPI and the Packaged Account Fee issues separate.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No keep the PPI and the Packaged Account Fee issues separate.

 

:-)

 

Will do.

 

Thanks Slick

 

:-)

Give a man a gun and he'll rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he'll rob everyone!

 

 

The Bank:

 

An institution, where you can borrow money if you can present sufficient evidence, to prove that you don't need it !!!

 

 

The Banker:

 

A man, who will lend you an umbrella, but want it back as soon as it will start to rain !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No keep the PPI and the Packaged Account Fee issues separate.

 

:-)

 

I can still use the same spread sheet as the one for PPI, right?

 

Thanks

 

TFD

Give a man a gun and he'll rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he'll rob everyone!

 

 

The Bank:

 

An institution, where you can borrow money if you can present sufficient evidence, to prove that you don't need it !!!

 

 

The Banker:

 

A man, who will lend you an umbrella, but want it back as soon as it will start to rain !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can still use the same spread sheet as the one for PPI, right?

 

Thanks

 

TFD

 

Found it.

 

Is the one called "Compound Interest" ?

 

Thanks

TFD :-)

Give a man a gun and he'll rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he'll rob everyone!

 

 

The Bank:

 

An institution, where you can borrow money if you can present sufficient evidence, to prove that you don't need it !!!

 

 

The Banker:

 

A man, who will lend you an umbrella, but want it back as soon as it will start to rain !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi TFD,

 

See here for a link to the right PPI spready - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011&p=3653267&viewfull=1#post3653267

 

Don't use a compound int't (CIS) spready for PPI.

 

You have a better chance of reclaiming Packaged a/c fees if you again use a simple spready, not compound. Before deciding on this, it would help if you tell us :-

 

1. How much is involved in Package fees.

 

2. Over what period you paid them.

 

3. Whether they changed your a/c to Additions status with, or without, your consent or knowledge.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi slick

 

See here for a link to the right PPIicon spready - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...=1#post3653267

 

Don't use a compound int't (CIS) spready for PPI.

 

You have a better chance of reclaiming Packaged a/c fees if you again use a simple spready, not compound.

 

 

So then is ok if I use the same one for both, which is the first one in the link above. Just need to change the title from PPI to account fees, right?

 

Thanks TFD

Give a man a gun and he'll rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he'll rob everyone!

 

 

The Bank:

 

An institution, where you can borrow money if you can present sufficient evidence, to prove that you don't need it !!!

 

 

The Banker:

 

A man, who will lend you an umbrella, but want it back as soon as it will start to rain !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you give answers to my 3 Q's above.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi slick

 

Before deciding on this, it would help if you tell us :-

 

1. How much is involved in Package fees.

all together about £250 charges

 

2. Over what period you paid them.

from 2005 till 2009

 

3. Whether they changed your a/c to Additions status with, or without, your consent or knowledge

I think they charge it how they were pleased. I couldn't find any letter to confirm any changes. Was stopped for a few months in 2006 then started again. Didn't even know we pay this.

 

Funny thing is that, they stopped charging this together with the PPI in 07/2009.

 

 

Thanks

 

TFD

Give a man a gun and he'll rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he'll rob everyone!

 

 

The Bank:

 

An institution, where you can borrow money if you can present sufficient evidence, to prove that you don't need it !!!

 

 

The Banker:

 

A man, who will lend you an umbrella, but want it back as soon as it will start to rain !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, use the first linked spready - one for the PPI and one for the packaged fees.

 

By the way, where was the PPI charged.

 

Carefully go through the bank statements with 2 different coloured highlighter pens. Mark every PPI fee in one colour and every package fee in the other colour. Then enter all the highlighted fees on to the appropriate spready with dates.

 

Take you time so you get every one, then let us know what the spreadies show for each type of fee and the interest.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi slick

 

Already started :-)

 

Thanks

 

TFD

Give a man a gun and he'll rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he'll rob everyone!

 

 

The Bank:

 

An institution, where you can borrow money if you can present sufficient evidence, to prove that you don't need it !!!

 

 

The Banker:

 

A man, who will lend you an umbrella, but want it back as soon as it will start to rain !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

Right, all done.

 

By the way, where was the PPI charged.

What you mean by where was charged, slick?

 

PPI - 347.2 + int = 599.28

Acc - 250.5 + int = 431.75

 

both by today's date

 

 

Thanks

 

TFD

Give a man a gun and he'll rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he'll rob everyone!

 

 

The Bank:

 

An institution, where you can borrow money if you can present sufficient evidence, to prove that you don't need it !!!

 

 

The Banker:

 

A man, who will lend you an umbrella, but want it back as soon as it will start to rain !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

attach the spreadsheets

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi TFD,

 

Was the PPI charged on an overdraft and is this PPI something you agreed to previously.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey dx

 

How do I attach doc's? I've only attached pics on here, so far.

 

Thanks

 

 

TFD

Give a man a gun and he'll rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he'll rob everyone!

 

 

The Bank:

 

An institution, where you can borrow money if you can present sufficient evidence, to prove that you don't need it !!!

 

 

The Banker:

 

A man, who will lend you an umbrella, but want it back as soon as it will start to rain !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi slick :-)

 

Hi TFD,

 

Was the PPI charged on an overdraft and is this PPI something you agreed to previously.

 

:-)

 

Yes. It was for O/D. Didn't agreed to it. We didn't even know we paid it until Barclays contact us about it.

 

 

Thanks

 

TFD

Give a man a gun and he'll rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he'll rob everyone!

 

 

The Bank:

 

An institution, where you can borrow money if you can present sufficient evidence, to prove that you don't need it !!!

 

 

The Banker:

 

A man, who will lend you an umbrella, but want it back as soon as it will start to rain !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can attach the spreadsheets themselves in .xls format

just like you downloaded them.

 

 

go advanced bottom below right post quick reply

manage attachments

 

 

don't forget to redact mind!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give a man a gun and he'll rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he'll rob everyone!

 

 

The Bank:

 

An institution, where you can borrow money if you can present sufficient evidence, to prove that you don't need it !!!

 

 

The Banker:

 

A man, who will lend you an umbrella, but want it back as soon as it will start to rain !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...