Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

United Kash purchased Different Money Debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2703 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I have been viewing this forum on and off regarding debt problems throughout the years and have recently had a disturbing phonecall with United Kash.

 

They have advised unless I pay £530 they will do an attachment of earnings to my employer to recover the sum.

 

The debt is from 2013 originally with Different Money. They were very demanding on the phone so I have since blocked their number. They also advised they may send someone out to my parents home, where the alleged debt originated. I didn't know this was lawful in sending someone out in N.I.

 

Can someone advise how to best deal with this. I don't have the finances to pay this debt. They want a copy of my I&E, bank statements and copies of recent payslips.

 

Many thanks in advance,

Rich

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't fall for their tactics

doesn't matter where you are

THEY ARE NOT BAILIFFS

no DCA has ANY LEGAL POWERS

 

 

and be told to leave or you'll call the police

 

 

pers i'd be ignoring UK kash

use out search and you'll get the idea

I've moved your thread to the PDL forum too.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

payday loan?

is there a court judgment on the matter, or is it just a template empty threat letter. what exactly has happened. further details needed

NI = northern ireland?

There is no court judgement. And yeah it is Northern Ireland.

 

 

They said they would send someone out to collect the debt but it is my parents home and don't want them involved. Are they likely to go to court for a small debt? I am worried about the potential attachment of earnings. Is this likely with them?

 

please don't fall for their tactics

doesn't matter where you are

THEY ARE NOT BAILIFFS

no DCA has ANY LEGAL POWERS

 

and be told to leave or you'll call the police

 

pers i'd be ignoring UK kash

use out search and you'll get the idea

I've moved your thread to the PDL forum too.

 

dx

Thanks for the reply also.

 

Have had a look around.

How would I go about stopping them coming out or going through the courts for an attachment of earnings?

 

 

I offered £1 a month which they literally laughed at and declined.

 

 

They want to see pay slips and bank statements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no court judgement. And yeah it is Northern Ireland. They basically said they would send someone out to collect the debt but it is my parents home and don't want them involved. Are they likely to go to court for a small debt? I am worried about the potential attachment of earnings. Is this likely with them?

one of those template empty threats then. there can be no attach of earnings or collection at home unless there is a court judgment and then following an application for enforcement.

they shld have to do a formal letter before claim before they go to court.

as asked, give us some more background to help us help you.

have you done a cca request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure why you are panicking so much here

let me guess

you've been talking on the phone to them??? if so STOP.

 

they cant get AOE

and they wont be sending anyone out

 

threats on the phone they'll never pu in writing.

 

gotta get a judgement first

 

and UKcash don't go to court

 

IGNORE

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

one of those template empty threats then. there can be no attach of earnings or collection at home unless there is a court judgment and then following an application for enforcement.

they shld have to do a formal letter before claim before they go to court.

as asked, give us some more background to help us help you.

have you done a cca request.

 

Haven't done a CCA. Ok I'll run through everything.

 

Took the loan with DM in 2013 for £150.

Did not pay it back as I had then lost my job and prioritised other debts over this.

 

 

Didn't hear anything until June this year when DM emailed saying they sold the debt to United Kash.

Now they have been calling and sending emails looking for payment.

 

 

Have spoken loads with them and there only seems to be two people there.

They issued a final response when I complained about the level of service.

Rejected outcome. Not going to bother escalating.

 

After reading yours and DX's comments I think I'll ignore them from now on.

My only concern is someone calling out to the home or them going to court.

Although these are unlikely, would they inform me prior to any home visit or court proceedings?

 

Any further info please ask.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore them now

you fell for the threats over the phone

 

never ever discuss your debts over the phone with anyone.

 

they say things that can never happen

simply to spook you into agreeing things.

 

ignore from now on

unless/until a claimform appears

 

and you wont get one of those now

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as posted, they wont be visiting.

and, re court, a letter before claim shld be done.

 

have you been to the fos

With DM I didn't escalate after the final response so no. And haven't escalated the final response from United Kash as they didn't acknowledge or reply to my whole complaint. Still within the 6 months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are not a mass of people volunteering to work as freelance debt collectors in NI and the loan sharks couldnt afford the insurance premiums for permanent staff. they are not coming round, This is a stock threat thye give to everyone. I doubt if the assignment of the debt is properly done, see what happened to MotorMile Finance this week. get following the correct procedures with a complaint and remind them of this and they will be more circumspect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Devils advocate here, but ultimately you'll still need to repay the loan - you did have the money after all. Just maybe don't pay the DCA, see if you can repay Different Money instead?

 

Just looked at Different Money's website, are you able to login to their account management area to make a payment? They still have a phone number on their site, maybe try that?

 

At the end of the day you will have to repay something to someone, debts don't simply disappear. Have you tried offering the loan amount plus one months interest and maybe an extra £15 for missing the repayment? That would be reasonable I would have thought. Based on £150 I'd say an offer of £200 would be sensible. As the others have said, only communicate in writing. Thing about ignoring demands like this, which I agree with the others are probably all empty threats, is that they still play on your mind. One thing is for sure, do not pay them £530.

 

You can choose to ignore them, put up with them contacting you on the phone/email (which they would be entitled to do) and perhaps then selling it onto anoter DCA in a few months time and the process starts again or just try and deal with it now and move on.

 

The loan was taken out pre-FCA rules so they're probably adding all sorts of fees to the loan which you should try and avoid paying

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debt is 3yrs old

And I expect irresponsible lending too??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

An update:

 

Received a final reminder letter from United Kash. Basically it says they have written to me before with no reply and the next stage may be litigation action. Goes on to say any additional costs will have be payable by me if judgement is found in their favour. They've then offered 25% off the total owed as an offer of F&F settlement to end any possible litigation action. Finally it states I can make an offer or complete I&E.

 

Another empty threat? By far the most aggressive Debt Purchaser letter I've ever seen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debt is 3yrs old

And I expect irresponsible lending too??

It was my only loan with DM. I was in a bad way with late payments and defaults when they completed their checks. Also final response from them three years ago was rejected and I did not escalate. Is there any way of getting them to look at it again?

Link to post
Share on other sites

but that's all the can do is threat.

these people are not bailiffs

they have no more legal powers than you or I.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

but that's all the can do is threat.

these people are not bailiffs

they have no more legal powers than you or I.

My only worry is them applying to court without my knowing of, and getting a summons letter. I do understand though it is unlikely. Just never had an instance of such aggressiveness from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why don't they know your real address then?

 

tell you what we find

those that scream and threaten the loudest

are usually the ones that have very few cards to lay on the table when pushed.

 

and they are offering a discount

speaks volumes.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore

No powers to do anything

Not bailiffs

Dirty Mac brigade

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is the answer always ignore on this subforum?

 

It's not that easy, getting texts like this can really unsettle some people and advising people to ignore their debts isn't the answer.

 

I understand what you're trying to say, they don't have any powers like bailiffs but still it would be best to try and get it sorted one way or another - it obviously isn't going to go away.

 

Advising people to ignore debt collectors on a debt forum is poor practice, there is still a legitimate debt outstanding (amount should be queried).

 

If you can't afford to repay what they want, complete the I&E and get a payment arrangement in place, it wouldn't take long to settle a debt of that size. Get a breakdown of the debt first, query the charges and fees as well. It'll stop the texts/calls for a while.

 

As I said before, you did take the loan so you should make an effort to repay something as long as it's reasonable and affordable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it may not necessarily be a 'legit debt'.

alot of payday 'debts' are irresponsible etc, on the say so of the authorities.

 

its ok to say ignore a text saying a collector will be coming, cause they wont (unlikely) be coming. and even if they do then they are trespassing.

 

let a matter go through the channels, inc the fos if necessary.

if its 'legit' in the end, then so be it. can deal with it then if required.

 

but, of course, if someone wants to pay on consideration of everything, and isnt up for challenging things, then fine.

 

richard, do a cca request,

and put a complaint in re any irresponsible lending, charges, etc.

if at the end it is what it is, then can negotiate a settlement.

 

texts are harmless, most modern phones can block them.

when i reported collection texts to loyds branch,

the manager rang loyds collections dca and told them to stop immed.

 

 

i know you're dealing with paydayers which maybe different to a 'loyds'. but, the practice is not condoned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, they applied for the loan, received the money and then never paid it back, so how can it not be legit?

 

Irresponsible lending is all well and good, when it suits the person who owes the money. Unfortunately recently it seems a lot of people look to that to avoid paying their debts (not referring to the OP here, just generally) - they don't mind taking the money and spending it then claim they should never have got the loan, well, you know what you shouldn't have applied for it and spent it. As much as lenders are responsible for poor checks, borrowers do need to take account to some degree too.

 

I'm not saying it was responsible or irresponsible, I don't know the background, my point was that ignoring debts is never a good idea.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so how can it not be legit?
as per my post. if the authorities say it isnt on consideration of the applicable law/rules etc.

 

my point was that ignoring debts is never a good idea.
not necessarily. eg one of mine is now barred mainly thanks to ignoring. the default has gone. no prejudice in the meantime re the default. as you note though, all depends on ones particular circumstances. which i pointed out.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is the answer always ignore on this subforum?

 

It's not that easy, getting texts like this can really unsettle some people and advising people to ignore their debts isn't the answer.

 

I understand what you're trying to say, they don't have any powers like bailiffs but still it would be best to try and get it sorted one way or another - it obviously isn't going to go away.

 

Advising people to ignore debt collectors on a debt forum is poor practice, there is still a legitimate debt outstanding (amount should be queried).

 

If you can't afford to repay what they want, complete the I&E and get a payment arrangement in place, it wouldn't take long to settle a debt of that size. Get a breakdown of the debt first, query the charges and fees as well. It'll stop the texts/calls for a while.

 

As I said before, you did take the loan so you should make an effort to repay something as long as it's reasonable and affordable.

 

but that's the moral stance

and as we too well know these people couldn't care a stuff about morals nor the legitimacy of debts they chase

 

you've missed a very important word out in this sentence..

 

Advising people to ignore debt collectorslink3.gif on a debt forum is poor practice, [if] there is still a legitimate debt outstanding (amount should be queried).

 

there should be a real big red IF

 

yes ofcourse debts don't go away

but that because of the DCA industry

buying and selling debts

if everyone simply stopped paying debt collectors

the whole industry would fail overnight

and you'd get the situation whereby original creditors cant and wont add anything to a debt and start to be, like what yo portray, reasonable

till then stuff 'em..

 

irresponsible lending and their responsibility for creating the situation the op is in is the true answer

not paying off bogus debt

to bogus DCA's that just use the money to line their pockets

and fund the 750'000 Claimforms theyt issue every year

again to linetheir pockets

to simply keep the whole threat-o-gram machine afloat

 

they have no legal powers

they are NOT bailiffs

ignore

 

 

the only time you never ignore is if you get a claimform.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...