Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
    • Even on their map on their website, these parking rules encompass the whole pleasure park - there is no dedicated area for permits and another for free parking as stated. royal leisure park praking area map.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Caught using brother student oyster card-SOMEBODY HELP!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2719 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Before I narrate the incident

I'd like to declare that I have realized my mistake and I'm really ashamed of whatever I have done.

So please provide provide honest and truthful information.

 

I was scheduled to have an interview for a job.

I was running late and was wearing my brother's trousers as this is my first job interview (I do not have formal clothes).

 

as soon as I entered the rail station I checked my pockets and couldn't find my oyster and thought I had left my oyster card at home.

However, my brother's oyster was in the trouser and just so that I make it on time for my first interview, I decided to use his and

 

as soon as I touched the oyster (for tfl london underground tube) one of the staff member called and said show me your card.

I remained calm and showed him

 

upon seeing his picture he knew it wasn't mine so he took all the details and asked me why have I got his card and not mine

I said I was in a rush and by mistake I took his card.

 

He was very adamant and very strict so he asked me to write my name and sign a piece of blank paper.

He noted all the details such as house address, my appearance as well:|.

He said we'll investigate further and check where it has been used to cross check

which is completely fine because this is the first time I actually used his oyster and got caught straightaway :sad:

 

He did mention that I was using my brother oyster to avoid fare and I said no.

 

I left and walked out of the station,

while on my way back I randomly opened my bag to see if I had kept my oyster in there.

Surprisingly enough it was in my bag.

 

By the time I got back to the station, the inspector was gone and since I was getting late for my interview I did not decide to do anything.

 

What I want to know is that what are the consequences of this??

I know it is my mistake and because of my carelessness I could get into serious trouble.

I have been looking online and it says that for some cases, a person can be fined upto a £1000 and a criminal record:sad:

I am in so much stress because it is a matter of education and employment-it could be over due to this wrong decision I made.

 

A criminal record is the last I need because I am in 2nd year of my university doing a health-science course (NHS) and can affect my studies.

 

What is the possible outcome?

the inspector did not give me any paper or form.

 

I'm 19 and it is my first offence.

How long do they take to get back to you?

Will I just be fined or will I have to go court?

Anything that I can to prevent them taking this case to a courrt?

 

Any help will be much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

whoa...slow down

stop panicking.

 

you MIGHT receive a letter

in that letter it will ask for you side of events.

 

when you do

comeback here

1st offence a genuine mistake

grovelling letter should sort it out of court without a record

but will cost you sadly

 

lots of other threads in this forum to read.

 

don't do anything without coming back here

IF you do get a letter.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

whoa...slow down

stop panicking.

 

you MIGHT receive a letter

in that letter it will ask for you side of events.

 

when you do

comeback here

1st offence a genuine mistake

grovelling letter should sort it out of court without a record

but will cost you sadly

 

lots of other threads in this forum to read.

 

don't do anything without coming back here

IF you do get a letter

 

dx

 

Thank you for your reply. Once recieved letter, I will summarise what it states on here. Can you send me link to similar.

Sorry what do you mean by "coast you sadly"?:noidea:

 

Hello again.

 

Your brother's card that you used, was it a special type of Oyster card please? Like a child card or for someone on benefits? I ask because you say it had a photo with it.

 

HB

 

Yes it is a 18+ student card with his picture on it. We are both studying at university.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cost you sadly

 

I mean

 

Use the search CAG box of the red top toolbar

 

Student oyster card

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. I'll try to write more when I get home, but yes, if they use the laws against you, there would be a conviction.

 

The best thing when they write is to be honest and try to negotiate an out of court settlement.

 

We'll help you through this, you need to wait for their letter first.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is a 18+ student card with his picture on it. We are both studying at university.

 

Is your Oyster card also a 18+ student card?

 

If you had used your Oyster instead of his : would you have paid the same fare, just off a different card (albeit one that you were entitled to use rather the one you weren't supposed to be using)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh god! What are the chances they'll take this matter to court?

 

 

I did speak to a different tfl staff member and he said it could take months for them to get back to you

 

If proven guilty will it show on a record?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is usual they write to you and that takes up to six weeks.

IF (and it is a big IF) they decide to prosecute they may "lay the information in front of the court" within six months.

 

But, that is a way off.

 

 

For now, focus on if you have committed an offence (and if so which one : see my recent post on if your Oyster & your brother's are both 18+ student ones),

and then on how to persuade TfL not to prosecute.

Panicking won't help.

 

Providing relevant facts and working out your best way forward will help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

stop ringing them!!

 

wait for the letter IF one comes!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is usual they write to you and that takes up to six weeks.

IF (and it is a big IF) they decide to prosecute they may "lay the information in front of the court" within six months.

 

But, that is a way off. For now, focus on if you have committed an offence (and if so which one : see my recent post on if your Oyster & your brother's are both 18+ student ones), and then on how to persuade TfL not to prosecute.

Panicking won't help.

 

Providing relevant facts and working out your best way forward will help.

 

Thanks for your support. I'll try to not to stress and not panick. I've not committed any offence before thus this would be my first one just because of my stupidity of not checking the oyster card properly

 

stop ringing them!!

 

wait for the letter IF one comes!!

 

dx

 

I didn't ring them, just spoke to one at station.

 

 

Just out of curiosity,

should i ring IRCAS and just ask the consequences

(my mind is stuck on this and won't be able to anything properly until i find out the actions they could take).

Link to post
Share on other sites

How old are you?

Home office guidelines discourage prosecution for minor offences to first offenders under 21.

Doesn't mean that they can't prosecute, but if you respond to their letter (if you get one) with a grovelling apology and give them your oyster number, they'll be able to check that you have a similar looking card and could have been mistaken.

Btw, I suppose your brother has a season ticket on the card and you don't, otherwise this would take you off the rra 1889 at least.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you answer Bazza's question in post #11 please?

 

HB

 

Actually i just have a normal payg oyster not a student. I had applied for a student few months ago but still haven't got it and I had totally forgotten about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How old are you?

Home office guidelines discourage prosecution for minor offences to first offenders under 21.

Doesn't mean that they can't prosecute, but if you respond to their letter (if you get one) with a grovelling apology and give them your oyster number, they'll be able to check that you have a similar looking card and could have been mistaken.

Btw, I suppose your brother has a season ticket on the card and you don't, otherwise this would take you off the rra 1889 at least.

 

I am 19 yrs old. I am actually using a normal payg oyster card where i top up weekly. Although I have applied for an oyster but haven't got a clue- what happened with my application.

He just has a 18+ card-discount price for fares. What do you mean by "otherwise this would take you off the rra 1889 at least"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am 19 yrs old. I am actually using a normal payg oyster card where i top up weekly. Although I have applied for an oyster but haven't got a clue- what happened with my application.

He just has a 18+ card-discount price for fares. What do you mean by "otherwise this would take you off the rra 1889 at least"?

 

 

Had you both had student 18+ oysters, and both been using them "pay as you go", the fare would have been the same for both Oysters.

Thus you could have argued that you never intended to avoid your fare (since both would have been deducted the same fare). "RRA 1889" is the Regulation of Railways Act 1889, where Section 5(3) deals with travelling without previously having paid the fare, with intent to avoid the fare.

This is one of 2 possible offences TfL often consider for ticketless travel, the other being railway / TfL Bylaw 18.

 

It may (thus) look to TfL more likely you were trying to pay a cheaper fare by using your brother's card (than if you'd both had student 18+ oysters, and been using them PAYG, where it would have been easier to argue that it was just an error and TfL wouldn't have been at risk of losing money).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had you both had student 18+ oysters, and both been using them "pay as you go", the fare would have been the same for both Oysters.

Thus you could have argued that you never intended to avoid your fare (since both would have been deducted the same fare). "RRA 1889" is the Regulation of Railways Act 1889, where Section 5(3) deals with travelling without previously having paid the fare, with intent to avoid the fare.

This is one of 2 possible offences TfL often consider for ticketless travel, the other being railway / TfL Bylaw 18.

 

It may (thus) look to TfL more likely you were trying to pay a cheaper fare by using your brother's card (than if you'd both had student 18+ oysters, and been using them PAYG, where it would have been easier to argue that it was just an error and TfL wouldn't have been at risk of losing money).

 

No, only he has a 18+ oyester. I use an adult one since I haven't got my student oyster meaning I pay more and I think that's what the ticket inspector had in mind that i was trying to avoid fare.

Yes I know but it was an accident, I never meant to do it...

What are the actions they're most likely to take? and what can happen in worst case scenario?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What are the actions they're most likely to take? and what can happen in worst case scenario?

 

Most likely, they'll write to you, asking for your explanation of events.

 

Worst case scenario is if you don't tell the truth when you write back, as then they'll likely prosecute. This can happen if people try to "put a spin" on events, and end up describing something TfL know is unlikely .... so don't be tempted to embellish the truth!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am 19 yrs old. I am actually using a normal payg oyster card where i top up weekly. Although I have applied for an oyster but haven't got a clue- what happened with my application.

He just has a 18+ card-discount price for fares. What do you mean by "otherwise this would take you off the rra 1889 at least"?

 

Looking at TfL fares, if your brother's card did not have a weekly, monthly ticket but just pay as you go, the fare is the same as adult oyster.

So, if you we're using pay as you go on your brother's oyster, you haven't evaded your fare: Pay as you go is transferable.

Did your brother's oyster have a weekly or monthly pass?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at TfL fares, if your brother's card did not have a weekly, monthly ticket but just pay as you go, the fare is the same as adult oyster.

So, if you we're using pay as you go on your brother's oyster, you haven't evaded your fare: Pay as you go is transferable.

Did your brother's oyster have a weekly or monthly pass?

 

There can be a difference in payg fare : there is also a discount to some Payg fares if the 18+ Student Oyster has had a 16-25 (year old's) Railcard applied to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...