Announcements
-
-
Tweets
-
-
Posts
-
Yes I understand that, my point is why is the account still be reported on 6 years after the default date has passed regardless of the SB date. The default expired 4th November, Cabot put a query on the account the 7th November so it is still showing in my history, my question is why are they doing it? -
By ericsbrother · Posted
You will have to go to court to get an order and once that is doen then you both have to abide by it. The actual form filling is not complicated and the first court session doesnt actually make any decisions and you will be advised to reach an agreement that can then be set in stone by the court. the father has a right to "contact", but this is not the same as having the right to demand a particular set of visits, stopovers etc so decide what you want, and how this is practical and then ask that the contact be limited to this. for example if you work your contact will all be gettinmg them up, feeding them, putting them to bed and have no fun time at weekends if has has them then. The courts will do what is in the best interests ogf the child so you need to stop being jealous of their love for their father and dont try and use the system to punish him or the children. If he was abusive or controlling them read up on the serious crimes act 2015 about controlling and coercive behaviour and see how amny fo the examples fit his behaviour and use that to get the courts to set lterms that limit that behaviour instead of using the children as the tools. -
By ericsbrother · Posted
Does anyone know if a person has the right to use a lay representative in the family division of the county court? the wording of the Lay representatives(right of audience) order 1999 refers to a county court and stage 1 or tier 1 proceedings and Scots law have a form to fill out for such representation but it isnt clear whether the english system has such a clearly defined right of audience. The MoJ mentions it in some discussion papers as though it is hard and fast but in other documents it is McKenzie Friends who are written about as if they are the only people allowed other than sols/barristers. reason why lay rep needed is they can speak and the other side cant object where with McKenzie friend they cant speak on behalf of claimant/respondent and the other party can object to that person being present- which will happen in this particular case. Ultimately it may well be a discretionary power of the judge but dont want to start off with a bad step. -
By ericsbrother · Posted
It seems as though the solicitoras want to keep hold of this payday and will do anything to churn it ( make money by continuing an action that isnt in the clients interests). The land registry will have the record of who paid for the property and how so you will be in the clear on that as you didnt just take the place over, you bought it from the estate of the deceased. now it seems like your mother is struck by regrets/remorse over her inability to take over the property at the time and what tends to happen is that relatives will sit there and say bad things about the person who they see is the beneficiary of their misfortune and then get into a feedback loop, each reinforcing the wrong opinion of the other. Your attempts to sort things out logically ahs tempered this somewhat so do continue and keep clear of their lawyers at all costs, they will just keep the meter ticking over and bring the negative thought back to the surface. your parents will already be about 2 grand a day down on anything the sols have done so try and get them to look back to the mess that her father's death left them in and amke it clear that at least the house is still in the family and that she has benefitted from that by receiving money at the time that otherwise she wouldnt have got. If that still causes friction then I would still write to them rather than responding to the solicitor, the lesson they will learn will cost them less and when the sols have moved on to the next client they will have not lost so much of what they still have left. Ultimately if they do actually issue proceedings you can ask for the claim to be chucked out as having no merit etc by showing how the place was bought. I do struggle to believe that people dont know who their mortgage was with even after all of this time, same as I find it odd that people suddenly find details for accounts with tens of thousands in that they had forgotten about. You can find out as again it will be in the Land registry entry for most properties that had a mortgage -
A claim was issued against you on 30/07/2019 Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 31/07/2019 at 18:14:49 Your acknowledgment of service was received on 01/08/2019 at 08:05:52 Your defence was submitted on 30/08/2019 at 23:17:46 Your defence was received on 02/09/2019 at 01:06:05 DQ sent to you on 27/09/2019 DQ filed by claimant on 27/09/2019 You filed a DQ on 23/10/2019 Your claim was transferred to BIRMINGHAM on 14/11/2019
-
-
Our picks
-
Be a kid this Chistmas
BankFodder posted a topic in Bear Garden,
Be a kid this Chistmas. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/419309-be-a-kid-this-chistmas/-
- 1 reply
-
-
Caledonian Moving and Storage - Disappearance of Belongings @CaledonianMove
StormWarning posted a topic in General Consumer Issues,
Caledonian Moving and Storage - Disappearance of Belongings. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/418604-caledonian-moving-and-storage-theft-of-belongings/-
- 11 replies
-
-
Mobile users can now switch providers with one simple text
Andyorch posted a topic in Telecoms - mobile or fixed,
Mobile users can now switch providers with one simple text. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/417284-mobile-users-can-now-switch-providers-with-one-simple-text/-
- 4 replies
Picked By
Andyorch, -
-
@curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK refused to honour purchase
Irt8787 posted a topic in Currys/Dixons,
Currys refused to honour purchase. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/417157-currys-refused-to-honour-purchase/-
- 124 replies
-
-
behind on swift loan with suspended REPO - going for repo again lots of charges
By
winniep, in Swift Advances
style="text-align:center;">
Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1134 days.
If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.
If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.
Thank you
If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.
If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.
Thank you
Recommended Posts
-
Recently Browsing 0 Caggers
No registered users viewing this page.
-
Have we helped you ...?
