Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
    • You left the PCN number showing, but no worries, I've redacted it. Euro Car parks are very well known to us.  I've just skimmed through the titles of the latest 100 cases we have with them (I gave up after 100) and, despite all their bluster and threats, in not one have they taken the Cagger to court. You stayed there for 2 hours &:45 minutes.  I'm guessing the limit is 2 hours and 30 minutes, right?  
    • If the claimant fails to draft directions the court can order a Case Management Hearing to set them but normally in Fast Track claims the claimant sets the directions...Unlike small claims track which are always set the court.
    • Not Evris offer, the court offers mediation service.   All claims proceed to hearing if mediation fails /not happen.   Why do you not wish to attend in person to stand your claim ?     Absolutely you must comply with the courts directions or your claim risks being struck out. Preparation for a hearing should happen irrespective of mediation.   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460613-suing-a-parcel-delivery-company-when-you-dont-have-a-direct-contract-with-them-–-third-party-rights-copy-of-judgment-available/#comment-5255007   Andy  
    • LPA.  (I'm fighting insolvency due to all the stuff that he and lender have done).  He appointed estate agents - (changed several times). Disclosure shows he was originally appointed for a specific reason (3m after repo) : using his powers as acting for leaseholder to serve notice on freeholders (to grab fh).  There was interest from 3 potential buyers. He chose one whose offer depended on a positive result of the notice.  Disc also shows he'd taken counsel advice - which was 'he'd fail'.  He'd simultaneously asked to resign as his job (of serving notice) was done and he'd found a buyer.  Lender asked him to stay on to assign notice to the buyer.  Notice failed, buyer didn't buy.  So receiver stayed.  There was 1 buyer who wanted to proceed w/o fh but receiver/ lender wasted 1y trying to get rid of them!  Disc shows why. But I didn't know why at the time. In later months Lender voiced getting rid of receiver. Various reasons - including cost.  But there's a contradiction/ irony: as I've seen an email (of 4y ago) which shows the receiver telling lender not to incur significant costs and to minimize receiver costs.    Yet lender then asked him to serve another notice - again counsel advice indicated 'he'd fail'.  And he did fail.  But wasted 3y trying and incurred huge legal costs - lender trying to pass on to me. Lender interfered - said wanted to do works.  Receiver should have said no.  But disc. shows he agreed to step aside to let them do the works - on proviso lender would discuss potential costs first (they didn't), works wouldn't take long (took 15m), and lender would hold interest (they didn't) (this last point is crucial for me now - as I need to know if I can argue that all interest beyond this point shouldnt be allowed?)   I need to check receiver witness statement in litigation with freeholders to see exactly what he said about 'his position'. But I remember it being along the lines of - 'if the works increased the value of the property he didn't have a problem'.  Lender/ receiver real problems started at this point. The cost of works and 4y passage of time has meant there is no real increase in value. Lender (or receiver) didn't get any permissions (statutory or fh) (and didn't tell me) and just bulldozed the property to an empty shell.  The freeholders served notice on me as leaseholder for breach of covenants (strict no alterations).  The Lender stepped in (acting for me) to issue notice for relief of forfeiture - not the receiver.  That wasted 2y of litigation (3y if inc the works) and incurred huge costs (both sides).  Lender's aim was to do the works that every potential buyer balked at due to the lease restrictions.  Lender and receiver knew couldn't do works w/o fh permission. Lender did them anyway; receiver allowed.  Receiver remained appointed.  I'm arguing lender interfered in receiver duties.  Receiver should have just sold property 4-5y ago w/o allowing any works.  Almost 3y since works finished the property remains unsold (>5y from repo). The property looks brand new - but it was great before.  The lender spent a ton of money - hoping that would facilitate a quick sale.  But the money they spent and the years they have wasted has meant they had to increase sale price.  It's now completely overpriced.  And - of course - the same issues that put buyers off (before works) still exist.   The receiver has tried for 2y to assert the works increased value. But he is relying on agents estimates - which have proved highly speculative. (Usual trick of an agent to give a high value to get the business - and then tell seller to reduce when no-one buys.). And of course lender continues to accrue interest (despite 4y ago receiver saying pause interest). Lender tried to persuade receiver to use specific agent. Disc shows this agent was best friends with the lender's main investor in the property.  Before works this agent had valued it low.  After works this agent suggested a value 70% higher!  The lender persuaded receiver to sack one agent and instead use this agent.  No offers. (Price way too high).   Research has uncovered that this main investor has since died.  I guess his investment is part of probate? And his family want it back?    Disc shows the sacked agent had actually received a high offer 1y ago.  Receiver rejected it.  (thus I don't know if the buyer would have ever proceeded). He was relying on the high speculative valuation the agents had given him to pitch for the business. The agents were in a catch-22.  The receiver sacked them. Disc shows there has been 0 interest ever since (inc via new agent requested by lender). I don't think lender or receiver want all this to come out in public domain via a trial.  It will ruin their reputations. If I can't get an order for sale with lender - can I apply separately against receiver?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car Clamped on Drive while on Holiday by High Court Enforcement Officer***Resolved***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2732 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I Wonder if anyone can help.

 

I have a debt that although I still dispute was incorrect they were able to get a CCJ.

The dept was for approx £2000.

After a visit last year from a high court officer I set up a payment plan of £60 a month which I have been paying for the last 9 months or so.

 

I have been paying the middle of the month as I understood the payment was due the 26th of each month.

We went to visit a friend for 8 days in Barcelona

 

got a call from the person looking after our pet that our car was clamped on the drive by a person who I assume acts from Elliot Davies the people I pay each month.

 

I called from Spain and he said he knew I was away in Spain as he had asked the neighbours.

Apparently he said the payment was due the 3rd of the month so I am in arrears the £60 for this months payment.

 

Of course I have no issue paying the £60 as I was going to do it on Monday as I landed today but he said on the phone that there is no chance and he wants £1000 immediately and drastically increased payments to release the car.

 

We left on Holiday the 15th he initially visited the 18th knew we were away then visited the 20th and clamped the car.

 

The paperwork says this

 

Debt £2338.22 (£542.10) received

Interest £165

Compliance fee £90

Enforcement Stage fee £1288.72

Total £3339.95

 

One letter says or pay outstanding amount of £2745.95

 

I emailed their office from Spain to try and get none threatening clarification (as the bailiff was very sure of himself...)

but I only found out late friday so their office was shut.

 

I need to call tomorrow, is there any advice of my rights or what I need to do

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dominic22 and Welcome to CAG

 

I have moved your thread to the appropriate forum..please continue to post here.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you get any paperwork from the HCEO when you set your payment plan up?

 

Also forgot to mention - did you know Elliott Davies were taken over by Court Enforcement Services in July this year.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I am going to get the original paperwork out tomorrow to check what it says.

 

 

When I called last month to pay she mentioned setting the payments to a specific date as I had been paying different days (I assumed always early but would vary by a day or so each month) but I never had anything off them so was just going to call tomorrow and pay the £60 as normal.

 

I have never paid the beginning of the month always the middle onwards.

If I am late as they changed it to the 3rd (with no written notice) at worst from his visit I was late by 12 days as I was completely up to date.

 

No did not realise they were taken over, I certainly was never informed.

When I spoke to the bailiff he said he spoke to my Neighbours and they told him I was on holiday until today.

Edited by Dominic22
Link to post
Share on other sites

what was the original debt all about too please

 

ps please do not post personal names

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would I be right to think you have been paying on or before the original agreed due date and if you continued with that schedule this months payment is not yet due,

yet they are saying they have changed the date and that has caused the alleged default?

 

 

Did you agree to a change of date for payment?

Have they refused your regular payment for October?

Have you put your arguments to them in writing?

(phone calls just don't cut it with these people and unless you record them they will deny receiving them)

 

I noticed you have been advised elsewhere to apply for a stay of the writ and a variation order to the payments,

 

 

You would need to submit your N244 to the nearest Court that acts as a district registry to the High Court, this best done in person

 

 

when submitting you can ask for an urgent hearing,

there is no guarantee a 'spare' Judge will be available to hear your application on the spot but you might get lucky.

 

Once the Court have your n244 you should inform CES you have made the application, then confirm that to them by writing/email,It is only fair to warn you that until such time as he court hearing takes place all enforcement action can continue and your car can be removed should they be of the mind set to do so.

 

If negotiating with CES does not resolve your problem please feel free to come back here and you will get all the help you need to take the Court route.

 

Please do not engage the services of the other site it could end up costing you very, very dearly as many before you have found out. I say that without malice and give it freely as a warning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I am going to get the original paperwork out tomorrow to check what it says.

 

 

When I called last month to pay she mentioned setting the payments to a specific date as I had been paying different days (I assumed always early but would vary by a day or so each month) but I never had anything off them so was just going to call tomorrow and pay the £60 as normal.

 

I have never paid the beginning of the month always the middle onwards.

If I am late as they changed it to the 3rd (with no written notice) at worst from his visit I was late by 12 days as I was completely up to date.

 

No did not realise they were taken over, I certainly was never informed.

When I spoke to the bailiff he said he spoke to my Neighbours and they told him I was on holiday until today.

 

Dominic,

 

You can be assured of getting accurate advice on this forum but this advice is wholly dependant on having accurate background information. The following questions are important:

 

 

You have said that the payment arrangement was set up last year and that this arrangement followed a
personal visit
. Accordingly, there would have been enforcement agents fees charged at the time of that visit. Can you let us know what charges were applied to your account at that time.

 

Did the enforcement agent come into your property...if so, did he make a list of items?

 

Did the enforcement agent make a list of items that included your motor vehicle?

 

I have many clients with High Court debts where payment arrangements have been agreed but an agreement for £60 per month on a judgment of £2338 is almost unheard of. I am assuming at the time of the visit that you either had no goods or that you were unemployed etc? Is this correct?

 

How much roughly is the vehicle worth?

 

Is the vehicle yours or your partners?

 

Is the vehicle subject to finance etc?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Was the agreement made by order of the Court or just with the Enforcement Agent who set it up?

 

If by the Court then dangle that to them and tell them in no uncertain terms what they can do.

 

If with the attending EA:

1 - do you know if he consulted with the Claimant first?

2 - as above were any goods taken under control?

3 - as already asked was any paperwork produced?

If the answers are all no then it will be in your best interests to apply for a Stay of Execution against the Writ & for a Variation Order endorsed by the Court.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies for the lack of update.

 

 

I will answer the questions when back a little later

but I have found the original paperwork from the enforcement visit on 04/12/2015.

 

In the notes she has put.

 

" £60/month to start 30/1/15 (def will pay each month by this date due to pay dates)"

I had the 26th in my head to make sure I made the payment before the 30th

and also that is when I get paid so by that letter my payment is not due until the 30/10/2016

 

I spoke to their office and Simon the Enforcement officer

and it seems they have no paperwork as I assume they have taken over all the file after buying out Elliot Davies.

 

I have scanned a copy of this part in and sent it and waiting to hear.

 

It sounds like they amended something in September making me late for payment.

 

Will update when I get a call after they review the paperwork

Edited by Andyorch
EO name removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dominic,

 

You can be assured of getting accurate advice on this forum but this advice is wholly dependant on having accurate background information. The following questions are important:

 

You have said that the payment arrangement was set up last year and that this arrangement followed a
personal visit
. Accordingly, there would have been enforcement agents fees charged at the time of that visit. Can you let us know what charges were applied to your account at that time.

 

Did the enforcement agent come into your property...if so, did he make a list of items?

 

Did the enforcement agent make a list of items that included your motor vehicle?

 

I have many clients with High Court debts where payment arrangements have been agreed but an agreement for £60 per month on a judgment of £2338 is almost unheard of. I am assuming at the time of the visit that you either had no goods or that you were unemployed etc? Is this correct?

 

How much roughly is the vehicle worth?

 

Is the vehicle yours or your partners?

 

Is the vehicle subject to finance etc?

 

Dominic,

 

Are you able to provide a reply to the above questions (in particular, with regards to the vehicle)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. Bit of an update...... They have came and moved the clamp, was a very stressful afternoon.

 

I had found the paperwork and of course as stated it said that payment was not due until the 30th of the month.

Even after that Court Enforcement services stated that Elliot Davies had advised them to continue with getting the car.

I told them that they are Elliot Davies... but the girls in the office seem to ignore that point.

 

I had of course sent paperwork and had bank statements to prove that I had paid etc.

 

What it seems is that CES have very poor paperwork from Elliot Davies so they are acting blind from before May of this year so no original paperwork etc.

 

 

In the end I advised them if they wish to take the car and I would visit Burton Court tomorrow and request a hearing and let a Judge decide.

 

 

In the end they said it was there admin error...

... As I said to them I have had 3 days of wasted holiday

the embarrassment of a car clamped on the drive with a note on the screen

and a full day of trying to sort it.

 

It is a lesson I guess in making sure you have paperwork,

if I had not have had that original order they would have had the car and I am not sure it would ever have got sorted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. Bit of an update...... They have came and moved the clamp, was a very stressful afternoon.

 

I had found the paperwork and of course as stated it said that payment was not due until the 30th of the month.

Even after that Court Enforcement services stated that Elliot Davies had advised them to continue with getting the car.

I told them that they are Elliot Davies... but the girls in the office seem to ignore that point.

 

I had of course sent paperwork and had bank statements to prove that I had paid etc.

 

What it seems is that CES have very poor paperwork from Elliot Davies so they are acting blind from before May of this year so no original paperwork etc.

 

 

In the end I advised them if they wish to take the car and I would visit Burton Court tomorrow and request a hearing and let a Judge decide.

 

 

In the end they said it was there admin error...

... As I said to them I have had 3 days of wasted holiday

the embarrassment of a car clamped on the drive with a note on the screen

and a full day of trying to sort it.

 

It is a lesson I guess in making sure you have paperwork,

if I had not have had that original order they would have had the car and I am not sure it would ever have got sorted.

 

I am delighted to hear you have resolved this matter without having the extra costs of litigation (it is always better to go down the 'negotiating' route first. It is a shame it spoilt your holiday but at least you can sleep easy now. Well Done to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done on resolving this Dominic22 and many thanks for your donation...I will amend tour the thread title to reflect the outcome.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pleased things are sorted for you & agree it must have been stressful & possibly embarrasing. Now that you have a date when payment must be made then you should ensure clear funds are available and best way is to pay approx 1 week before it is due making due allowance for any Bank Holidays. Remember you have had a warning of what can happen if you default.

 

What you must ensure however is that any charges made for the last few days have been removed. The Writ itsself is only valid for 12 months but may be renewed upon request, if not renewed then there is no compulsion to keep paying - if it is renewed then the cost will be added to what you owe. You may be surprised to find that payments you have made so far will have had little impact on the initial debt as they are entitled to retain monies for fees.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks. They stated that all enforcement fees that had been added on this episode have been taken off but I possible need to get that in writing.

 

Is what you are saying that the enforcement order that I had in December 2015 that I referred to today (i.e £60 pm due the 30th or before) with them is only valid until Dec 2016 then that needs to be re-done and renegotiated or does that original agreement keep rolling until the debt is paid in a couple if years

Link to post
Share on other sites

The writ they are enforcing is only valid for a year from the date of issue.To enable HCE to continue with the handling of your account the creditor should renew that writ every year until such time as the debt is satisfied.

 

It would be interesting to see when the writ was issued, were HCE recently acting on a current or renewed writ or were they acting without a writ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the reference number on this paperwork seems to relate to the agreement in 2015. What happens if it is not renewed? or how do I find out if it has etc....They did mention that the client had only just agreed with the order but it was in place from 2015 and I was told that it was all agreed then.

 

You know I pride myself as being relatively bright but I am so glad you are all here as it is a different world that I seem to get more confused as the days go by :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

the reference number on this paperwork seems to relate to the agreement in 2015. What happens if it is not renewed? or how do I find out if it has etc....They did mention that the client had only just agreed with the order but it was in place from 2015 and I was told that it was all agreed then.

 

You know I pride myself as being relatively bright but I am so glad you are all here as it is a different world that I seem to get more confused as the days go by :-)

 

If the writ is dated December 2015 then all is ok at this moment in time. It is in the creditors best interest to renew the writ....if you were to default on your payments and there is no writ in place all they could do would be to ask you nicely to pay up....... he would then have to start the whole enforcement process again. smilie.pngsmilie.png

 

HCE should inform you if the creditor has applied to renew the writ. As an aside it would pay you to ask for a breakdown of payments made to date, fees charged and balance of your account just in case you have been 'accidently overcharged' on fees, also does the CCJ make mention to the claimant being awarded interest? when they made their first visit you said they listed goods taken into control, would you care to share that list with us? we would be interested to see if they were any goods on it that were actually exempt..

 

It is indeed a different world where enforcement is concerned and High Court are at the top of the list when it comes to confusing people. Just thank yourself lucky to have found cag...no false info and no costs to you getting things sorted on this site.smilie.pngsmilie.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks. They stated that all enforcement fees that had been added on this episode have been taken off but I possible need to get that in writing. Agree strongly with that.

 

Is what you are saying that the enforcement order that I had in December 2015 that I referred to today (i.e £60 pm due the 30th or before) with them is only valid until Dec 2016 then that needs to be re-done and renegotiated or does that original agreement keep rolling until the debt is paid in a couple if years

 

The renewal is done seamlessly & any payment arrangement just carries on. You can check on the renewal process by giving the Writ No to the Queens Bench Enforcement Section at the Royal Courts of Justice in London - but give it a couple of weeks after the date to allow the records to be updated.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...