Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Don't bother with what Trading Standards tell you about this - we've had far more experience in dealing with gym m/ships over the years.   1. Have you cancelled the DD mandate - if so, when ?   2. When did you last use the gym, approximately.
    • I sent them their quote which outlined the 8-10 weeks start to finish.  Their response is also below.  I placed the order 1st Sept and would have been ok with a couple of weeks here or there as I know delays can be experienced due to others in the chain/weather etc but Feb was too much. I hadn't thought to contact the council re the Building Regs, will do that tomorrow.  At this stage I've only paid the deposit on credit card but it's £2k. The next payments are in stages and they will not accept cards.  Their advice re delays on 29/9 was in response to me asking if we had an install date.  The same day they were advertising for fitters. Their refusal to get their director to call me or make an appointment is making me nervous of continuing.  I woke this morning thinking I would go ahead as we hit it off when he came round but if his administrator has enough clout to stop me talking to him she must be a member of the family as well.     "We did advise a 8 – 10 week installation process from survey which was on the 07/09/2020 so working on this lead time your installation date is due on the week commencing 16/11/2020.   We then advised on 29/09/2020 there is unfortunate delays and I gave you a worst case scenario date as depending on the delivery times this could well be brought forward but we also have to consider we have a 2 week festive holidays.   You still have not been able to provide me with written confirmation that Collin, Davina or Lisa have stated this installation will happen before Christmas. So the delay is unfortunately 8 weeks with the potential of being sooner than this, I just can’t give you an exact installation date hence why I gave a worst case scenario."
    • Quick update -  Good news is that I have been told the car is complete and ready for pickup.  It ran a bit over so we agreed the swap is now tomorrow as I would never make it there before closing time with rush-hour traffic.   Bad news is I have potentially now found out the gearbox and brake fluid service has not been carried out.  We went through this yesterday, got a printout too suggesting it has been done but having just looked more into it, it didnt look right with 2 things standing out. For example:  Part Number: G060175A2, Description : Gear Oil, Qty: 1  This just kept standing out to me given my own Audi had 7 litres of it and they sell them in 1L bottles.   Looked up the part number and sure enough, its not gear oil but Haldex oil (part of the Quatro system).   Other thing that stood out was no filter on the sheet which is part of the service.     Have just dropped them an email so lets see what comes out of it but again sheet I have which is a PDI Requirements sheet (pre-delivery inspection) states:   Carried out MPC & oil service Haldex Reqs gear oil service Brake fluid change   I'm trying to remain calm
    • Hi.   Please don't hijack this thread, it's for advising the OP.   The best thing is to start a new thread of your own and then we'll advise you.   HB
    • Hey Andy, Dx,   With the deadline approaching to enter this defence i have amended as best i can. Can either of you help with it or point me in the direction of a similar case so i can get some ideas for myself? Or is the below ok? Considering i could of nearly perjured myself i would really appreciate it if you guys could take a look.   1. By agreement between the defendant and Halifax on or around the 3/3/2015 (the agreement) Halifax agreed to loan the defendant monies.     2.The defendant did not pay instalments as they fell due.     3.The agreement was terminated following a service of a default notice.     4.The agreement was assigned to the claimant.     5.The claimant therefore claims 1. 4.5k 2. Costs    Defence   1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.     2. The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017. It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.     3. Paragraph 1 is noted. It is accepted that I have had financial dealings with Halifax in the past. However I do not recall entering into any financial agreement with Halifax on or around 03/03/2015 and have sought verification from the claimant who has not complied with my request for further information.     4. Paragraph 2 is noted.   5. Paragraph 3 is noted.   6. Paragraph 4 is noted.   7. Paragraph 5 is noted. As i can't recall entering in to this financial agreement with Halifax i have asked them to prove that i had entered in to this agreement. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant; the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of credit agreement / assignment / balance / breach requested by CPR 31.14, and remains in default of my section 77 request, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:   a. Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and   b. Show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and   c. Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim     8. On receipt of this claim I requested by way of Royal Mail on 13/10/20 a CPR 31.14 request from the claimant’s solicitors and a section 77 requests to the Claimant, for copies of the documents referred to within the Claimant’s particulars to establish what the claim is for. To date the Claimant has failed to comply with my section 77 request and their solicitors, Mortimer Clarke, have refused my CPR 31.14 request.     9. As per Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.     10. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82 A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974     11. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Personal Independence Payment


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1454 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Just been informed that i will not be getting this benefit, i am currently in receipt of DLA.

 

The decision and reasons has been based on a seven minute examination and what has been alleged to have taking place in that period of time is complete and utter made up rubbish.

 

Luckily for me in a sense is that i had a witness my wife who taped the whole seven minute examination which is at complete odds with those giving by the [removed] person who Atos used to examine me.

 

Might send the footage to the media and expose just how and in under ten minutes the government are relying on this practice and in particular claiming parts of the examination which have been used as a means of stopping this benefit without actually carrying out such process which as far as i am concerned is criminal and very misleading.

 

Makes you wonder how many other disabled people are losing any rights that they have based on a fabricated report from Atos :mad2::mad2::mad2::mad2::mad2::mad2::mad2:

Edited by honeybee13
Racist remark removed.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well IMO they're going to be very hard pushed to have suddenly cured you and kicked you off this.

 

What level of DLA were you receiving, and how long for?

 

You can appeal thei decision, obviously, and lay down the facts etc, if you recorded this covertly then DO NOT inform them of this, simply transcribe the whole hilarious debacle, and then you can rebut their 'report' which we all know is simply tick boxes, lodge a formal complaint about the assessor too.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Well IMO they're going to be very hard pushed to have suddenly cured you and kicked you off this.

 

What level of DLA were you receiving, and how long for?

 

You can appeal thei decision, obviously, and lay down the facts etc, if you recorded this covertly then DO NOT inform them of this, simply transcribe the whole hilarious debacle, and then you can rebut their 'report' which we all know is simply tick boxes, lodge a formal complaint about the assessor too.

 

Thank you for your reply Bazooka Boo.

 

I was on the low rate DLA and my wife was also being paid as she has to look after me however my condition has got worse as well as having a heart condition after suffering two heart attacks i now have angina, since my last assessment.

 

If that was an examination to determined whether someone has a disability or not you could not make it up it was as if the assessor had already made the whole story up and wrote his report before seeing me for seven minutes.

 

He needs reporting because whilst i know i have a disability i am sure people with far more of a disability than me are being treated the same which is quite worrying tbh.

 

Who do i need to report the assessor too because this is not right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm so sorry to hear your PIP outcome andydub64. It appears that more and more of these assessors are miraculously curing people in a nano second. How come you are entitled to DLA then overnight your condition has improved to the point that you no longer require this non means tested benefit.

Just wanted to know, did you get permission to record and did the assessor agree to this? Not sure if it would hold up if they were not advised that you were recording them. Ask for a Mandatory Reconsideration, and their report on their assessment of you. You will find that many of the assessors answers are pre-programmed responses and often repeat themselves over and over again.

Atos were bad enough, these replacements appear as bad. Also it doesn't help when TV programmes keep putting on documentaries about benefit cheats. These people ruin it for all the genuine people who ARE entitled to PIP, ESA, DLA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No i did not get permission to record the assessment, my wife recorded it, all seven minutes of it which clearly shows the assessor has lied through his back teeth.

I will invite the assessor to retract his allegations and on the provision that i have personal data by way of a recording that demonstrates he has giving a false and misleading misrepresentation which he has knowingly disclosed of being A FABRICATION OF MEDICAL FACTS.

I want to report him immediately and i am in the process of writing a letter of complaint to The Medical Council as this type of action is not only immoral it boarders on him being a criminal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DO NOT let them know you have a record of the sham interrogation.

 

Simply report the fake assessor to the medical council, lodge a formal complaint with your local MP, and demand that they explain why they are content with persecuting the sick & disabled of this country.

 

Demand a copy of the report, if needs be send the DWP a SAR, which is free, and becomes a pain in the rear for them to do so.

 

You need to attack them in the right way, showing your hand now will NOT help you, keep a copy of the recording, this will be the ace up your sleeve if needs be.

 

You don't want the assessor to retract their statements, you want them to further incriminate themselves so you can have them struck off.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
DO NOT let them know you have a record of the sham interrogation.

 

Simply report the fake assessor to the medical council, lodge a formal complaint with your local MP, and demand that they explain why they are content with persecuting the sick & disabled of this country.

 

Demand a copy of the report, if needs be send the DWP a SAR, which is free, and becomes a pain in the rear for them to do so.

 

You need to attack them in the right way, showing your hand now will NOT help you, keep a copy of the recording, this will be the ace up your sleeve if needs be.

 

You don't want the assessor to retract their statements, you want them to further incriminate themselves so you can have them struck off.

 

OK thanks for those valid points it is appreciated and i will follow what you have suggested and in the interim ask for his report but i am not going to pay the £10 fee for what is a pack of lies through SAR am i right to assume that going through the DWP they will have to produce the report??

Link to post
Share on other sites

First have you asked for the Mandatory reconsideration? Have you asked for a copy of the report of your assessment? You need to do this so you can go for an appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites
First have you asked for the Mandatory reconsideration? Have you asked for a copy of the report of your assessment? You need to do this so you can go for an appeal.

 

No i have not asked for a mandatory reconsideration yet Sparks i got the decision last Friday but for what it is worth and to follow the process only i will ask for their mandatory reconsideration which i assume would be based on the fabrication of the facts giving by the lying assessor so i will not be holding my breath but just following their process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

The SAR can take longer than 28 days to arrive. You must ask for the written report of the assessor and a Mandatory Reconsideration and return it within 28 days from the date on the PIP decision letter. They may overturn their decision at Mandatory or they may still decline your application. If they do, you must apply to the appeal stage within 28 days if the Mandatory Reconsideration Letter decision is a 'no'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On the first link where on the form do i need to indicate that i want sight of the assessors report, thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a template on CAG that indicates the Claimant wishes to the decision not to award PIP is to be assessed on the Mandatory Reconsideration as i want to get things moving now.

 

Pending the mandatory reconsideration process and any subsequent appeal hearing by a Tribunal if a Tribunal is needed what is the rules on payments for DLA, are they automaticly stopped or does the Claimant continue to receive DLA until the Tribunal is adjudged and determined?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just phone up the number on the PIP decision letter and tell them you want them to send you their assessors report as you are going to submit a Mandatory Reconsideration based on the reasons you feel you should be awarded PIP. You will be shocked when you read the report as in all probability it will be totally contradictory and pre-programmed repetitive sentences. It takes about a week to arrive, so don't delay as you only have one month from the date of the original decision to return the Mandatory, include any fresh evidence you may have and challenge what you disagree with on the report (do not tell them that you have recorded the assessment). You then wait for their decision. It may be a positive outcome and you will get awarded PIP.

 

If not you then have one month from a negative decision in which to Appeal, telephone them and tell them you are going to appeal. The link can be downloaded https://www.gov.uk/pip/appeals You can read the notes on how to appeal on this link and use the form to appeal. First of all the Appeal is reassessed again by the DWP before being sent to Tribunal.

 

Hope this information helps. Not sure if DLA is re-instated, maybe someone else can advise this.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just phone up the number on the PIP decision letter and tell them you want them to send you their assessors report as you are going to submit a Mandatory Reconsideration based on the reasons you feel you should be awarded PIP. You will be shocked when you read the report as in all probability it will be totally contradictory and pre-programmed repetitive sentences. It takes about a week to arrive, so don't delay as you only have one month from the date of the original decision to return the Mandatory, include any fresh evidence you may have and challenge what you disagree with on the report (do not tell them that you have recorded the assessment). You then wait for their decision. It may be a positive outcome and you will get awarded PIP.

 

If not you then have one month from a negative decision in which to Appeal, telephone them and tell them you are going to appeal. The link can be downloaded https://www.gov.uk/pip/appeals You can read the notes on how to appeal on this link and use the form to appeal. First of all the Appeal is reassessed again by the DWP before being sent to Tribunal.

 

Hope this information helps. Not sure if DLA is re-instated, maybe someone else can advise this.

 

Hi, yes i have just telephoned them and they are going to send the assessment report.

 

They asked what grounds was i appealing on and informed them that the assessors report is fabricated and evidently could not be completed in seven minutes as was the case.

 

They have giving me two numbers as to identify who the assessor was and i have informed them that i am making an immediate complaint against him on the grounds on gross medical misrepresentation which would not only be in my interest but also in the interest of the public who have funded this fraud of an examination.

 

I am also seriously considered Court action against his employers if they fail to act and intervene accordingly as again giving who has funded this assessment out of the public purse, again why should the public be responsible as to pay for what is just plainly corrupt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On further information and whilst trying to file a complaint with the GMC they have said that the name Atos have giving and the male

who carried out the medical is nor registered with them as this would be on their system and a reference number produced?

 

Could it be that in their haste to get as many disabled people off this benefit and the volume of claimants being assessed that both the DWP and

Atos are now employing ghost doctors not qualified, if so again this is completely flawed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Raise this issue with your local MP, seriously, hammer them and demand they explain why the sick and disabled are still being persecuted by this government.

 

Secondly, the fact that they are not on the GMC register isn't surprising at all, yours is the second case I have read where an unregistered HCP has carried out an assessment and then fabricated the report in order to remove the social security from the claimant.

 

Criminal possibly, morally wrong, most definitely!

 

Did they, the assessor claim to be a Dr?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Raise this issue with your local MP, seriously, hammer them and demand they explain why the sick and disabled are still being persecuted by this government.

 

Secondly, the fact that they are not on the GMC register isn't surprising at all, yours is the second case I have read where an unregistered HCP has carried out an assessment and then fabricated the report in order to remove the social security from the claimant.

 

Criminal possibly, morally wrong, most definitely!

 

Did they, the assessor claim to be a Dr?

 

I don't know the answer to this, but does the assessor for PIP have to be a doctor? For ESA it can be a qualified healthcare professional [HCP] who has done a few weeks' course with Atos.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know the answer to this, but does the assessor for PIP have to be a doctor? For ESA it can be a qualified healthcare professional [HCP] who has done a few weeks' course with Atos.

 

HB

 

No they don't have to be a Dr , they are HCP's whatever they are

 

Mine is on record as saying that baked beans on toast is a simple one course meal - what a pile of crap

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites
No they don't have to be a Dr , they are HCP's whatever they are

 

Mine is on record as saying that baked beans on toast is a simple one course meal - what a pile of crap

 

Ha ha ha, that is first class BS.....I read one where it said that the claimant had 'dyed hair', god forbid any of us should even dream of trying to make ourselves feel better by a bit of pampering!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you fletch and BB. I know some crazy things happen and that you've had your own problems, but could we keep to advising andydub please and keep this thread on track? :)

 

HB

 

Yes apologies, I blame Fletch...... :focus:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...