Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi dx100uk,    OK will do, I'll wait for that possible stage to come and keep this updated when I can.   I didn't buy a parking ticket.   Kal   ...       Way off topic but I love your profile pic, gonna listen now and allow Jeff Beck to send shivers down my spine in his epic WGW P3 solo ✌️    
    • Apologies, misunderstanding on my part. I was thinking of a shop called Cotswold. Please ignore me.   HB
    • 1st Draft - reviewed several statements    I was a bit unsure about adding more about the section 78, although they took a very long time the did provide the CCA - any help appreciated    In The *******County Court Claim No. ********* Between **********Claimant and *************** Defendant     I am the defendant in this case and make this Witness statement in support of my defence in this claim. The matters set out below are within my own knowledge, except where I indicate to the contrary.   1. It is my understanding that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct disputed or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed ...10p to 15p in the £1 and which the original creditors have already written off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income. Idem Capital securities issue claims to circumvent and claim the full amount of debt to maximise profit.    2. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights. This means that when an assignee purchase’s debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information). The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.   3. It is accepted that I have in the past had financial dealings with HBOS. That being a Credit card Agreement.   4. After seeking advice this led me to check all paperwork I held with creditors, from this I could not find any Credit Agreement relating to the account the claimant is referring to.   6. I therefore sought clarification and requested copies of the agreements from the claimant by way of a section 78 request for the alleged amount.    7. A Letter before claim pursuant to Pre Action Protocol was issued by the claimant 06/09/2019. I made a request for the following documents:   ·         A copy of the Default Notice ·         A copy of the Notice of assignment ·         A complete set of statements detailing exactly how the debt has accrued detailing ·         All transactions ·        Any additional charges applied since the account was terminated ·         A statement  of all payments received.   The claimant to date has failed to comply completely with my request and has not provided me with the required Default Notice.      8 .On the 13/11/19 the claimant issued a claim form through the county court business centre. On receipt of the claim form I made a CPR 31.14 request.    9. A CPR 31.14 request was sent 25/11/2019 via Royal Mail signed for and shows as received 27/11/19. A Request for the following documents was made:   ·            Default Notice ·            Full statement of account     The claimant to date has failed to comply and disclose the default notice.   Conclusion   To date no Default Notice has been produced.    The claimant has still yet to comply with my CPR 31.14 request with regard to clarity of any valid default notice issued, as yet I have never received an original or seen a copy of a valid default notice from the claimant.   Arbitration confirmed that the claimant could not produce the Default notice document    Therefore for the above reasons the claim bought by the claimant is without merit and an abuse of the court process. It would be far more gracious and forthright for the claimant to admit that they do not have possession of the correct valid paperwork and this is an attempt to convince the court that the claimant can disclose the legal valid documents on which its claim relies on.   Until such time the claimant can comply and disclose a Default Notice they are not entitled while the default continues, to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 87 (1) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974.    I **********, the defendant, believe that the facts stated in the witness statement are true.     Signed…………………………. Dated……………………………
    • time for an sar first make sure you read all the posts in the sar link too.   dx  
    • its a car park at the side of a lake   simplest thing to do is ignore them until or unless you get a letter of claim.   then comeback here.   i will gather you didn't buy a ticket at all?   dx  
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 7 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1356 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

A query on behalf of a friend

- she lent her car to someone who committed a traffic offence whilst driving it

 

- she received the initial letter but had just had a baby and was unwell so didn't respond in time.

 

The other driver later admitted the offence but they prosecuted my friend anyway because the information was not received in the time limit and took her license away as she was a relatively new driver.

 

She drives for a living so she appealed.

 

The hearing was adjourned and a new date set for this week

- she is worried in case they do revoke her license as she will then lose her job.

 

Any advice that could help would be gratefully received.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it she is appealing the sentence? (rather than the conviction, or both).

Did she:

a) plead guilty initially?,

b) appear in court? (rather than plead guilty by post, or not appear!)

c) make a plea in mitigation for reduced points (even at the expense of an increased fine!) to avoid disqualification?

d) have a lawyer familiar with the bench make the plea in mitigation?.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

She is appealing both..

..it was for doing 36 in a 30 zone but as I said, her friend was driving not her.

 

 

She has not pleaded guilty..

..she sent an appeal because she had just given birth and was unwell so missed the original PCN..

..it is now a year ago since the offence.

 

 

The original hearing was adjourned until now because of her health

...from the court letter I am assuming she pleaded not guilty as it says hearing adjourned for trial to take place.

 

 

Details of the case say she failed to give information relating to the identity of the driver, which is true but only because of her circumstances at the time.

 

 

She cannot afford a lawyer...

.she is on maternity leave so only receiving half her salary.

 

 

I am going to court with her but trying to get some advice on how best to go about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Details of the case say she failed to give information relating to the identity of the driver, which is true but only because of her circumstances at the time.

 

If that is what happened, and she did not give the information (or it was late), then she would be guilty of the offence.

The circumstances may be considered to be mitigation, not a defence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is potentially a defence

- if it was not reasonably practical for her to provide the information within the 28 days then she has a defence, provided she did provide it as soon as reasonably practical (if it was ever reasonably practical).

 

Precisely what is reasonably practical isn't defined by the law and is a question for the court to make a judgement call on based on the specific circumstances.

 

 

If she was seriously ill in hospital for many weeks with no access to her home or her mail then it would be a very hard hearted magistrate who thought that she should have been able to respond to the NIP.

 

 

On the other hand if she was just a bit run down after giving birth and let things get on top of her then it would be harder to argue that it wasn't practical for her to open her mail and spend a few minutes posting a form.

Somewhere between those two scenarios there's a grey area where the court might decide either way.

 

If she's convicted then 6 points are mandatory,

and if she gets 6 points then revocation of her licence is automatic

- the court has no power to waive it because of the hardship it would cause.

 

 

So she has little to lose by trying to argue the point.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe your friend can make statutory declaration during or after the proceedings for Traffic Offences. Your friend was not driving so she should not plead guilty either. Besides your friend's main defence, her lawyer should concentrate their mitigation for her insofar as the driving licence is necessary to perform her job which without simply stops you from making a living. In addition, the prosecution has actual and or constructive knowledge that your friend was not driving so in any event, there is 'public interest' in any conviction where the lady concerned was/ is a mother who made a mistake by not making a statutory declaration at an earlier time. In addition, the guidance provided by Chief Police officers is that the speed limits permits actual speed& 10% & 2, with further discretionary thresholds as the vehicle's speedometer is not reliable unless calibrate like commercial vehicles: lorries/ coaches etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I believe your friend can make statutory declaration during or after the proceedings for Traffic Offences. Your friend was not driving so she should not plead guilty either. Besides your friend's main defence, her lawyer should concentrate their mitigation for her insofar as the driving licence is necessary to perform her job which without simply stops you from making a living. In addition, the prosecution has actual and or constructive knowledge that your friend was not driving so in any event, there is 'public interest' in any conviction where the lady concerned was/ is a mother who made a mistake by not making a statutory declaration at an earlier time. In addition, the guidance provided by Chief Police officers is that the speed limits permits actual speed& 10% & 2, with further discretionary thresholds as the vehicle's speedometer is not reliable unless calibrate like commercial vehicles: lorries/ coaches etc.

 

Irrelevant.

 

The summons isn't for speeding.

The summons is for failure (as registered keeper) to provide information on who the driver was!.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A query on behalf of a friend

- she lent her car to someone who committed a traffic offence whilst driving it

 

 

- she received the initial letter but had just had a baby and was unwell so didn't respond in time.

 

 

The other driver later admitted the offence but they prosecuted my friend anyway because the information was not received in the time limit and took her license away as she was a relatively new driver.

 

 

She drives for a living so she appealed.

 

 

The hearing was adjourned and a new date set for this week

- she is worried in case they do revoke her license as she will then lose her job.

 

Any advice that could help would be gratefully received.

 

 

Clarion, what law did they use against your friend, ie the section and name of Parliament Act (ie statute). Was this to do with an enforcement police camera?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Clarion, what law did they use against your friend, ie the section and name of Parliament Act (ie statute). Was this to do with an enforcement police camera?

 

A query on behalf of a friend

- she lent her car to someone who committed a traffic offence whilst driving it

 

 

- she received the initial letter but had just had a baby and was unwell so didn't respond in time.

 

 

The other driver later admitted the offence but they prosecuted my friend anyway because the information was not received in the time limit

 

"initial letter .... didn't respond in time" and "information was not received in the time limit" suggests this is S 172, Road Traffic Act 1988

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/172

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"initial letter .... didn't respond in time" and "information was not received in the time limit" suggests this is S 172, Road Traffic Act 1988

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/172

 

 

Hmm, you're right Bazza. We need do know more about the OP's mental disposition, ie were there forces affecting their person that made it difficult telling the other driver's (third party's) ID, which may provide at least a basic defence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...