Newlyn removed car for CTAX debt - but notice of enforcement is over 12 months old?

[Leakie]

good result

council back down Newlyns backed down as they were wrong!!

obviously not a strong case if went to court otherwise they would not back down .

good result Bru as you agreed you owed the £310.

 

Leakie

[brassnecked]

Best result in a bad situation, Bru has to pay the Compliance and Enforcement fees as we knew, but the elephant of a months Storage Fees, which would be considerably more and the Removal/Sales Fee have gone away.

[Peterbard]

Nope they agreed to the offer they proffered earlier , if they were wrong they would have to return the 235.

 

The result, was because someone spoke to them and came to a sensible agreement.

 

All parties should be congratulated.

[Bru911]

just to correct Leakie post #203:

The Notice of Enforcement was 19/08/2015

The date of vehicle removal / car seized was 10/10/2016.

 

I must thank Bailiff Advice for sorting this out as there was never any disagreement with a debt being owed to the bailiff firm.

 

It was purely the area about if they able to take control of the goods of the debtor after the expiry of a period of 12 months beginning from the date of the notice of enforcement. when there is no arrangement with the enforcement agent.

 

this was never about, if any sums of money are owed, solely, may they take control of goods.

 

Bailiff Advice has worked to get the vehicle returned and back into my possession.

without additional cost, all fees such as storage and tow truck fees were removed .

 

The sum owed was never in dispute:

£75 Compliance stage

£235 First Enforcement stage

have now been agreed to be paid.

 

The £235 was never contested in any way Dodegball

 

Only the bailiff action itself.

 

Many thanks Bailiff Advice, I think all parties concerned acted to correct this matter , and the debt owed to the bailiff firm at the end of the day has to be paid as the were duly owed the sums as stated above £310 in total.

 

This was never about the money, regardless if money was paid to the council or otherwise only may they take control of goods and as such the the vehicle after the period of the NOE had expired and no agreement or arrangement was in place with the enforcement agency.

 

To which, I have my vehicle back .

 

 

FINAL UPDATE !!!

[Leakie]

Thanks for the update Bru,

and for the correction, Just glad you got it sorted in the end.

 

Leakie

[Peterbard]

Taking control of goods and the Enforcement fee are synonymous. The truck fees are no longer charged as a sapperate dispersement.

 

Storage costs would not be payable it the outstanding amount was paid and goods returned in any case.

[brassnecked]

Glad it's sorted Bru

[Bailiff Advice]

 

Bailiff Advice has worked to get the vehicle returned and back into my possession without additional cost, all fees such as storage and tow truck fees were removed .

 

Many thanks Bailiff Advice, I think all parties concerned acted to correct this matter , and the debt owed to the bailiff firm at the end of the day has to be paid as the were duly owed the sums as stated above £310 in total.

 

FINAL UPDATE !!!

 

I was just glad to help in way that I could in order to resolve this matter.

 

Thank you for updating the forum.