Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi,  Here's my draft and please feel free to give me suggestion: ========== Dear Sir/Madam, TFL case number: **** I would like to thank TFL for providing me the opportunity to explain my behaviour. I realised the stupidity of what I have done and wish to seek a resolution to this matter. I have no valid excuse for this action and I am extremely sorry and deeply regret my action. I hope you will accept my sincere apologies. Nothing can justify my action. I am aware that TFL are only able to operate if everyone pays their fare correctly and I feel so guilty about attempting to breach public trust. This has caused me sleepness nights and raised my anxieties. I have history of anxiety. This has been a hard lesson learnt. I have never been in trouble with the law in the past and I ensure that I won’t be in the future. I am and will be using my oyster card (PAYG). I would like to humbly appeal to TFL to allow me to settle this matter out of court and avoid going to prosecution given the adverse consequences it can have on me and my family. I am very concerned that prosecution for the first time and I would like to make restitution for my action. Having a criminal offense on my record will have detrimental consequences on me. I have always been a law abiding person and have no previous offences.     I would really appreciate if I can be given the opportunity to pay for any unpaid fares plus any charges and/or administrative cost which have been incurred by TFL due to this incident. I am sincerely remorseful and ashamed of myself, and I fully appreciate the severity and stupidity of my transgressions. Again, I would like to offer my sincerest apologies. Yours Faithfully, My Name -----------------------------  
    • My wife dropped my daughter off at a kids party space on a trading estate and didn't think to look for signs as she parked outside the establishment. We got a £60 (reduced early payment) fine. Although now the signs are to be seen its a lot of money is this something we must now pay? Attached is the notice and the signs. Looks obvious now but when you are driving to a party warehouse on a trading estate and looking for the place itself its easy to miss this and especially when it seems logical to park there and walk in. My wife was there for 30 minutes. Thanks in advance Sam          A4.pdf
    • That's such a perverse judgment its almost unbelievable Looks like totally ignored everything and just gave judgement on something that's not compulsory as in name a driver or appeal did judge confuse having to name a driver in a motoring offence case like speeding with the civil?
    • The OH had letter from Resolvecall regarding a very old LTSB debt at the start of the month. Knowing it was SB, I sent off the SB letter to Intrum who owns the debt. They responded to the OH last week when I was away. They basically said speak to Resolvecall and the standard letter, we'll pop to your house malarkey.... Just ignore as Intrum own the debt and from the looks of it have ignored the SB letter? The OH gets twitchy with these things, thanks PM.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Police/Recovery want to charge me £150 to return my stolen car wheels

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2597 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

A car was involved in stealing some car wheels from my house.


The incident was reported. The reg and vehicle details etc too.


The thieves car was later involved in an accident and abandoned... No tax, no insurance, you get the picture of the the drivers/theives... The car and the car they hit are both write offs.


The police seize and recover the car. They do forensics on it. It's held at the police contractors depot for a month or so. It's still there.


The recovered car has MY STOLEN WHEELS on it.


The police officer on the case agrees they're my wheels and says I can have them back and tries to arrange for me to go and remove/collect them from the recovery depot. I am a qualified and insured mechanic.


The depot says they cannot let me onto their property to remove the wheels "due to insurance and health and safety". But they will happily remove the wheels for me for the bargain price of £150.


I tell them that I am happy and qualified to do the removal my self, I am insured myself and I will write a declaration indemnifying their insurers and taking full responsibility for myself and my actions on their site.


They say no, pay us £150. I tell them £150 is outrageous - I would charge a maximum of £5 per wheel to simply remove wheels.


I go back to the police, the officer trying to help me seemingly has his hands tied.


So I'm referred to the forces Vehicle Recovery Scheme Manager who says pay the £150 or forget it.


The vehicle is now finished with and released by the police. It is unclaimed so will be scrapped. When scrapping a vehicle, the wheels and tyres will be removed as the tyres have to be recycled separately. I explained this to the VRS manager, stating that I could remove the wheels at the point of recycling, or collect them once they've been removed. He again refused.


I asked him why this would not be possible and he now ignores me.


The vehicle is due for disposal in 2 days, so I must act fast.


I accept that statute says vehicle recovery fees are to be met by the owner, but this is slightly different in that they are forcing me to pay an inflated price for a service that can be avoided with common sense, as again the wheels will be removed at the scrappage anyway. There is no logical reason why they can't be set aside for collection. I'm even prepared to remove them myself or collect as they are removed.


Anyone got any advice here? A really unfair situation which also stinks of corruption to raise revenue. Another police officer said I should not have to pay to get my property back, and as its property as opposed to the car, I shouldn't have to pay the recovery fee. Though technically they're not charging me for the recovery, they are charging a grossly inflated fee for a wheel removal service. £150 for a £20 job.


I refuse to let them get away with this, if I can fight it then I shall.




Thanks again for reading guys!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have also got quotes of £30-£40 including travel for a non Police contractor garage to do the removal, thus showing how grossly inflated the £150 charge is. As a mechanic myself I would charge no more than £5 per wheel if local, a little more if I had to travel.


Not fair! What can I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apart from stating this to them,


Quis Custodiet ipsos custodes?


I had a car approx two years ago stolen, it was a non-runner as I bought it simply for spare parts. Reported it stolen and two weeks later saw it listed as breaking for parts at a car scrapper.


I called the scrap yard and obviously stated "Oi thats my car!" Got a nonsense excuse and then called Police, Police seized car and told me I could have it back if I arranged transport back to my home, and paid them £150.


Bloomin gangsters!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My situation is a bit unusual in that it has my stolen property (my wheels) attached to the recovered car.


In a normal situation, eg your stolen TV was in the boot, any stolen property would be removed by police and returned to the victim at no cost. So why should I have to pay to get my wheels back?


The recovery company are refusing to let me remove my wheels, and refusing to let me have anyone but them or another police approved contractor do it either. At the same vastly more inflated cost of £150. It's obvious as to why this is - revenue for the police and their contractors. But it is not fair and not a fair price for simply removing wheels, as shown by quotes from local businesses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume that you can prove that you are the legal owner of the wheels and that there has not been an insurance claim by you for the wheels.

I would consider sending a letter before action to the garage saying that you will take them to court for the full value of the wheels and tyres. Taking them to court is relatively cheap and they may back down before going to court. I would offer them maybe £25 for the wheels in the letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the refusal to let you take the wheels off yourself was in writing

the recovery people wouldnt have a leg to stand on if it came to court.


as it stands it is a bit he said she said so tell them in writing that they know that you are the owner of the wheels and they are not entitled to dispose of them and any demand for vast sums of money to remove them is not a contract that you accept is being made in good faith


so you expect them to make the wheels available to you or you will be after recoving your loss from them in a court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...