Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks so much!    1. Ok so on planning permission my WS says: The signs did not have planning permission under the Town and County planning. I have an email stating there was no planning permission from the council.The signs do not fall under deemed consent.  * Their WS says they do not need planning permission by being an approved operator of the trade association, and it is not for the  county court to determine planning permission.       2. Excel are trying to say I’m dishonest. Their WS states my defence appears to be cut and pasted from websites relating to parking whose aim is to assist motorists on contesting PCN's. Large portions are non sensical and irrelevant to the claim This is Unacceptable as the defendant has signed a statement of truth whilst clearly not being the defendants knowledge  Q Any comments?      Their WS states that I alleged I received no correspondence, and the onus is on the driver to update DVLA. I did update DVLA, but I moved numerous times due to domestic abuse. This was in my set aside and part of why it was granted. Evidence was provided at that time. Q Is this going to come up again?    *Also they question how I would be able to comment on the signs if I’m not the driver of the vehicle, as she would not have first hand knowledge, therefore it is the claimants position that she is being disingenuous.  I state that photos will be provided in my bundle. I actually haven’t submitted any but I do also know somebody who had PCN from the same carpark, He gave me all his evidence etc, Mr Booth and he won his case. I linked to the parking pranksters article on it.  Q So is it ok to use such websites and to use photos from someone else?    Thanks 
    • Not anymore now that the right have manipulated voters into voting for a conservative dictatorship.   All of what you've said is just another worrying aspect of what the future holds 
    • Just like all the rubbish spouted over the past 4 years, would, would, would.  What you really mean is COULD.    
    • You're ignoring the most difficult issue in a trade agreement. It's not the tariffs or the lack of them  which is the tough part to reslove but the regulatory standards of the goods to be imported & exported that needs to be decided.   For example the EU banned the import of chlorine washed chicken since 1997 which of course hurts the US, and who are going to be very keen to include it in any new agreement with the UK and will use it to barter prospective concessions in exchange . As a nation we're going to first have to decided whether that is acceptable or not and that alone will be difficult enough to resolve. And that's just one product.   This has all the makings of a category 5 $h1t storm that will last an eternity. 
    • 28 of the 32 wealthiest countries in the world reside within the EU.  Realistically we will need the US because they are one of the few remaining countries outside of the EU that would be worth doing a deal with, but as discussed on here previously, the exact agreement we strike with the US is open to debate.  Should we still want a trade deal with the EU we would need to align our standards with them, which makes a deal with the US harder.   Also 80% of our economy is services.  Try selling financial services to a person in India... or try sending engineers half way round the world just because some numpty has decided trading with the countries geographically closest to us wont work anymore because of immigrants and sovereignty. 
  • Our picks

Alex.c

Second hand car, head gasket broken after 2 weeks

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1161 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hello. My name is Alex, I bought a Skoda Fabia 1.4 mpi on the 12 of september for 600£ from a local car dealer. I checked online and has MOT until aug 2017. He said he won't give me warranty as he only does for cars worth over 1000£ but if I have any problems to just go back to him. Aftet 2 weeks after a 15 min drive it started to over heat. I stopped and checked coolant level, and then took it to the nearest service. They told me it's the thermostat and head gasket and it would cost me over 400£ to fix it. I called the guy who sold me the car and he said he would take it to another shop. The problem is that I believe he should support the cost of the repairs or give me a refund for the car as only 2 weeks have passed since the purchase until it had broken down. What is my next legal step if he does not want to do either?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't anybody have any advice? I would like to know at least if I have the right to claim anything from him. Beeing the head gasket that has broken some may argue that I caused the fault.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to be quick as you need to reject the vehicle in writing to the dealer within 30 days from purchase

 

When you buy a second-hand car from a dealer, you have the right under the Consumer Rights Act to expect the car to:

  • be of satisfactory quality (taking into account its age and mileage)
  • meet any description given to you when you were buying it (whether in the advert or in discussions prior to sale)
  • be fit for purpose (for example, to get you from A to B safely)

The warranty excuse is crap as well from the dealer. One to three months warranty is a common period used by traders is not because that is what they have decided is fair but its because they know thats generally what a court would decide is fair

 

 

How did you pay for the car??

Edited by obiter dictum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I paid 395 by card and 200 in cash. Does it make a difference?

I am thinking that he could say that I damaged the car and he would not want to repair it/refund me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, but proof do I take to the bank?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sry, what proof do I take to the bank?*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can claim the entire amount with a section 75 not just the part paid using the card, so you claim back the £200 as well as the £395.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dealers think they can fob people off saying no warranty but by law it doesn't matter as you can claim for repairs or cancel the car in 6months

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The invoice I have from the seller says "test driven, checked, teade sale as seen, all future repairs will be done by the buyer". Does this cancel my right to a repair/refund?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

old hat that one, - no applicable any more


:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you mean?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

new regulation brought in, go claim back from your bank as post 8


:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so I called the bank for a charceback (because it's a debit card) and they said I need the receipt wich I have, a report from the service wich they gave me and proof that I returned the car. How do I get that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest roaringmouse

Trade sale huh? Well, unless YOU are a trade sale, it is not a trade sale is it!

 

As you paid by debit card and not credit card, the bank is not liable unlike a credit card company would be.

 

Letter before action stating you reject the car, then sue for the full refund via County Court.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know how much that would cost? Just to know if it's worth it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest roaringmouse

Court fee is £35, which is added to the total they have to pay if you win (which you will).

 

If you made ANY repairs (even a light bulb) add those costs on. Ideally you want the claim to be in excess of £600* before court fees. You also charge interest at 8% per annum. The online form is easy but ask here if you get stuck, BUT write to the deal;er first and give them 14 days in which to pay. mark your letter 'letter before action' and send it by signed for service.

 

Keep the letter to the point and say that you are rejecting the vehicle and that you want a full refund within 14 days or you will without further notice issue county court proceedings.

 

Ask here BEFORE doing anything else.

 

*£600 is the amount above which you can transfer to the high court if you win and the dealer does not pay - google 'meet the sherifs' and you will see how effective they are at collecting the payment, especially from car dealers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest roaringmouse

My mistake, court fee is £60 for that amount, but otherwise as said above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any progress in this Alex ??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent him a faulty goods complaint letter stating that I want a refund. I am waiting for his response.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did that 'faulty goods complaint letter' say you were rejecting the car per regulations ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It says rejecting in accordance with consumer rights 2015.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that alright?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that's fine. As long as you have used the word rejecting, there can be no confusion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used a template frim citizensadvisor so that word isn't actually in the letter. It says I want a refund

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...