Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Unable to Prove Vanquis default


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2751 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I had a default placed on my account by Lowell Portoflio 1 limited.

It only appeared about 4 months ago and had no relation to anything else on my credit file

- it appeared out the blue as a default with a value of just over £100.

 

I've since sent an initial letter that I found online, talking about how as they are the data processor they are responsible for providing with certain pieces of information etc.

 

I have gone back and forward with them using letters

- I had a response from them telling me they were unable to provide any of the information relating to the account or the default notice as they didn't keep this on their records.

They have advised that they will also not remove the default.

 

They mention in their latest response that the default is from a debt relating to a Vanquis account

- I;ve only ever had one account with Vanquis and it clearly shows on my credit history as being a well managed and then settled account with no missed payments.

 

I'm stuck as to what to do next!

Any help would be much appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have had a last response from Lowells, you can go several ways with this. The FOS can deal with a complaint, as to how the default is affecting you and if it is a mistake can ask Lowell to pay you compensation. The ICO can deal with any complaint about wrong data being processed. The credit reference agencies are also responsible for data, so you can complain to them as well.

 

Was your last response from Lowell from their Compliance and Data Protection Officer or just customer services ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

For starters, Lowell cannot place a default. They are allowed to update a default that has been filed by an original creditor by placing their name against it once the debt has been bought.

 

Can you type out exactly what it says on your credit file. If it is a mistake, it should be deleted.

I would also contact the credit reference agencies and add a notice of correction to this entry whilst disputing it with them. CRAs have a duty to ensure the data they hold is correct and they should contact the creditor for information.

 

Just to be on the safe side, contact Vanquis to see if they have placed a default against your name in error.

 

Once you have exhausted ALL avenues, I suggest that the FOS and the ICO be avoided. They are good at what they do but they take forever. I would be writing to Lowell and give them 14 days to remove the entry and if they fail sue them through the county courts.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have had a last response from Lowells, you can go several ways with this. The FOS can deal with a complaint, as to how the default is affecting you and if it is a mistake can ask Lowell to pay you compensation. The ICO can deal with any complaint about wrong data being processed. The credit reference agencies are also responsible for data, so you can complain to them as well.

 

Was your last response from Lowell from their Compliance and Data Protection Officer or just customer services ?

 

Thanks for this. The email was from their 'Head of Customer Services'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

For starters, Lowell cannot place a default. They are allowed to update a default that has been filed by an original creditor by placing their name against it once the debt has been bought.

 

Can you type out exactly what it says on your credit file. If it is a mistake, it should be deleted.

I would also contact the credit reference agencies and add a notice of correction to this entry whilst disputing it with them. CRAs have a duty to ensure the data they hold is correct and they should contact the creditor for information.

 

Just to be on the safe side, contact Vanquis to see if they have placed a default against your name in error.

 

Once you have exhausted ALL avenues, I suggest that the FOS and the ICO be avoided. They are good at what they do but they take forever. I would be writing to Lowell and give them 14 days to remove the entry and if they fail sue them through the county courts.

 

Thanks for the reply. This is exactly how the default appears on my Experian file. As I say, it just appeared from nowhere.

 

lowell.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting; that default has been live for over 4 years yet it has suddenly appeared on your file. Have you checked the linked addresses to see if there is one that you don't recognise?

 

I would now sign up to Clearscore and Noddle to see what they say as well.

 

Vanquis would be my first contact to see if they have defaulted you (or not)

 

If you haven't raised a formal complaint with Lowell (and headed the letter as such) that is something to do as well

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think you will find that the argument that DCA's cannot add defaults that were not previously noted, is subject to dispute. I seem to remember reading posts on CAG where court cases and legislation was quoted which showed that a new debt owner can add a default, providing it is correct.

 

If Lowell are saying it is Vanquis, perhaps the easiest way is to contact Vanquis in writing ( enclose a copy of Lowells letter) asking for a written explanation of why they have sold a debt to Lowell in your name, when you are not aware of any debt owing. Then see how how they respond, before taking a next step.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just now spoken to Experian who have advised that they will query this as a 'no account' with Lowell. Interestingly, the guy at Experian told me they have this debt as relating to a communications provider, whereas the letter from Lowell tells me it's Vanquis??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think you will find that the argument that DCA's cannot add defaults that were not previously noted, is subject to dispute. I seem to remember reading posts on CAG where court cases and legislation was quoted which showed that a new debt owner can add a default, providing it is correct.

 

If Lowell are saying it is Vanquis, perhaps the easiest way is to contact Vanquis in writing ( enclose a copy of Lowells letter) asking for a written explanation of why they have sold a debt to Lowell in your name, when you are not aware of any debt owing. Then see how how they respond, before taking a next step.

 

If you could find the links regarding the court case, that would be brill.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just now spoken to Experian who have advised that they will query this as a 'no account' with Lowell. Interestingly, the guy at Experian told me they have this debt as relating to a communications provider, whereas the letter from Lowell tells me it's Vanquis??

 

Yes well, this is Lowell we are talking about. They are not called the Leeds Losers for nothing. Most debt collectors only have the basic info on any account when they buy it and they have to go back to the original creditor if they need more info.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would contact Vanquis to see if they have erred in some way. As you say, you're account is up to date then there should be nothing there.

 

As Experian are saying 'Communications Provider' did you change a mobile phone contract in 2012? Or a landline?

 

I would only complain to Lowell, not just get more info. Once a complaint is filed, they should investigate properly.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you even have a vanquis card?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

does the end 4 digit match the one you know about?is the ref number 16 digits?

might be a clue here as if its not

then its not a credit card as not 16 digits...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you even have a vanquis card?

dx

 

First post!!

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just for information I had a default that I queried with Lowell as it was added years after the ICO guidance on when a default should be added.

 

I complained to Lowell who initially claimed it was nothing to do with them but the OC - when I pointed out that the default was added 7 months after they told me they bought the debt they basically realised what they'd done. I had pointed out the ICO guidelines and that I would take action and the result was lowells accepted the default should have been years earlier, corrected it (which meant it disappeared) and paid me over £650 in compo for the privilege.

 

So I guess I'm saying DCA's do add defaults but they should makes sure they do so in accordance with the guidance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the plot thickens.

 

According to my credit file, the default under Lowell's name is in relation to a 'Communications Account' specifically BT plc. The default amount is around £100.

 

In the latest communication from Lowell, the name Vanquis as the original creditor and the outstanding balance as £886.00. I've since spoken to Vanquis who have confirmed they have an account in my name which was settled (an account I know about) a number of years ago and well managed. They also confirm the account number Lowell are quoting does indeed relate to someone with my name, but a different address and date of birth.

 

I'm stuck with what to do next, other than to formally complain to Lowell?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you get that in writing from vanquis? If so, you then send a copy to Lowell alongside your complaint. They should then do what is right.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update - I had queried this with Experian but wasn't holding out much hope.

 

 

Experian have updated me to say they have spoken to Lowell

- Lowell have confirmed the debt relates to an address which isn't anything to do with me and have given Experian permission to update the address.

 

That was yesterday and as of this morning, my Experian report no longer shows any account for Lowell and my score has gone up.

 

Surely getting a resolution from these idiots can't be that simple???

Link to post
Share on other sites

what about the other credit file providers?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just wanted to update this. I've now managed to have this default removed from Experian and Equifax reports, now just awaiting a response from Callcredit. Both Experian and Equifax quried the validity of the default/account with Lowell and the very quickly responded to both, advising that the address could be updated (to an address which has nothing to do with me).

 

Fingers crossed Callcredit get it sorted and hopefully that's me seen the back of these Lowell [problem] artists.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...