Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lambeth Council PCN contravention code 01 - Appeal Ignored

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2786 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

Hi there,


I've been fined on the 16/07 with a contravention code 01 (parked in a restricted street during prescibred hours) while unloading my van as I'm a delivery man.


On that day when I arrived home I went to the Lambeth Council website and had filled the form to challenge the PCN which was corrected sent as I received an email back with a reference number and saying they would respond within 28 days.


Today I received a "Notice to Owner" to pay £130 and my question is, is this normal?


I will challenge again this PCN but they should have send me a letter/email with the result of my 1st challenge right?


Should I mention on this challenge that my first challenge wasn't considered and if I lose I shouldn't be paying £130 as the first PCN had just £60 to pay.


Grateful for your attention


Link to post
Share on other sites

They should have replied to your email. There could be a reason why they did not, or they may have replied and their letter got lost. Why don't you call them and ask?


In terms of your appeal now, definitely mention this and ask if the discount could be applied if they refuse the appeal. They might agree.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Jamberson!


They should have replied to your email. There could be a reason why they did not, or they may have replied and their letter got lost. Why don't you call them and ask?


In terms of your appeal now, definitely mention this and ask if the discount could be applied if they refuse the appeal. They might agree.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

At the time I was unloading some goods and my van was stopped in a double yellow line and I appealed saying that it is allowed when those cases happen.

I still mentioned that no observation time was made on the PCN left on my wind screen as they say now that the CEO has recorded that the vehicle was observed for 5 minutes and 09 seconds and no loading/unloading activity was observed nor was the driver seen. (for real?)

It has been refused as well on the basis that I should had to provided a job sheet with date/time/location... which I didn't


In the end and because I didn't get any reply from them and had escalated automatically to £130 they have made a gesture of goodwill to offer me again the £65 to pay.


Can anyone tell me if its worth it to appeal on ETA? Do I have some chances on this one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In general unloading is a continuous activity, so if the CEO watched the vehicle for five full minutes without seeing you return, it's hard to argue that you were in the process of unloading.


Do you have anything to show what you were doing?

Link to post
Share on other sites



I have same issue, been totally ignored by lambeth council,

received PCN because ticket run out the time from night to morning, I took a penalty charge put on front seat, scratch new parking card, but in that stress, haven't scratch the month,

received another penalty charge same day, car haven't moved, I made a representation, nobody replied, after 6 months bailiff lock my wheel, never received any correspondence from lambeth council,

question is 2 PCN same contravention but different codes, 05-06, where is the true? can someone help me, please?

already made application to Traffic enforcement centre about out of time / late application, it takes up to 2 months, in mean time still dealing with Lambeth to fight the right

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...