Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Tangliss, if you can't upload the letter, could you tell us what the heading is please? My understanding is it should say 'Letter before claim' or similar. HB
    • Do you think I should send the CCA request now then instead of waiting? I really can do without the stress. Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you for responding.
    • How was the "receiver" appointed and what is their role? Appointed by the lender under the terms of their security on the loan (sometimes referred to as "LPA Receiver")? Or are they acting for you in insolveny? What's the current role of the agent?
    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Defrauded by bank transfer by a Barclay's customer - should I sue?


mickrick
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2761 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was taken by a confidence trickster on Gumtree last week to the tune of £730.

they got me to transfer the money to a Barclays account and used a passport and Barclay's account statement to establish that he was bonafide.

 

 

A few days after the money was transferred, I got an email from Gumtree to say that this person was a fraudster.

 

I contacted Action Fraud (which only seems to be a way for the police to do absolutely nothing about fraud),

my own bank, Santander (who told me as I had willingly paid the money, I couldn't claim from them)

and Barclays, from whom I have just had an out-of-office email reply.

 

First things first

- how is bank transfer fraud and different from credit card fraud?

In both cases the money is paid willingly, yet you are covered when you are defrauded by credit card.

 

The next thing is,

how could Barclays have allowed this criminal to open and operate an account with them.

If the details he gave me are as a result of identity theft, then the bank should know this.

 

 

Anyone who opens a bank account has to supply personal details which the bank has to check vigorously to ensure they are legitimate. So as far as I'm concerned, Barclays hasn't done enough to ensure I was not a victim of fraud by one of their customers.

 

So would it be feasible to sue Barclays to have my money repaid, based on these reasons?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite simply no...

 

Credit Cards are covered by Section 75 etc etc but bank transfers are not.

My brother was hit by a fraudster on the exact same site and lost out on £150.

 

It was gumtree who sent the email to you about the person being a fraudster. How do you know its ID Fraud? The person could be a genuine Barclays customer but could have done this in deceit.

All you know at this point is that they have taken your money.

 

DPA prevents Barclays from releasing customer details to you (Even if you already know them)... What was this for anyway?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although for whats it worth you can make an official complaint to your bank about the transfer and Barclays too, but at the preset time, both banks are not responsible for the loss.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have any facts to support the identity theft, but the person who did this would have to be a bit short in the brains department if they used their own personal details to open a bank account and then use it for fraudulent purposes. At the very least he'd receive a hefty fine, and/or a prison sentence depending on how much and how many people he'd defrauded.

 

It was for a professional drone for aerial photography and video. It wasn't even as if it was an amazing price either, just what the going rate would be for a 2nd hand one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Understandably, losing money that youve paid for etc is hard enough.

 

Your only real option is to complain. but both banks are not liable in this case.

You could also try legal action?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No... Because once again you do not know if this is ID Fraud or not. Barclays are the receiving bank, and under DPA would NOT release information pertaining to someone else or there account details.

There isnt much you can do... Although you can ask your bank to attempt to recover funds, but its not guaranteed.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mick,

 

I agree with Fkofilee. It would be extremely hard for you to prove that Barclays failed to exercise due diligence in giving an a/c to their customer. And Barclays really have no contract with you. Your own bank is primarily responsible to you.

 

1. Did you meet the seller to inspect the ID doc'ts or was it done by email.

 

2. Did you receive the drone and it was not what was described or expected, or did you receive nothing.

 

3. Have you complained to your bank seeking a refund of the transferred funds.

 

If the answer to 3 is NO, I would complain to your bank in writing immediately but keep it brief and factual. Don't fire accusations at everyone - just say you have been told by Gumtree that you're the victim of fraud and you want your bank to recover funds from the seller's bank.

 

Get proof of posting when writing to your bank.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me address the comments both of you have made:

 

The reason I am asking if I could sue Barclays would be reliant on whether they had made enough effort to ascertain that someone opening an account with them was who they said they were. If they had used fake or stolen documents etc and Barclays hadn't made the necessary checks, they would have failed in their duty of care to anyone conducting business with this person. As you have both said, I don't have any evidence that this was the case and the bank is under no obligation to me.

 

However, I have only just learned in the past couple of hours that Which? has opened a super complaint against the banks for exactly this reason - that they cover people who have suffered as a result of credit card fraud, but not bank transfer fraud. What will come as a result of this is anyone's guess, but it does make sense as far as I'm concerned.

 

I received the [problematic] "details" by email. My bank has confirmed that the account I made the payment to was a Barclays account, but they haven't confirmed whether or not the person I paid the money to was the person named on the documents. My bank has agreed that this was extremely elaborate as more than one pice of plausible identification for the same person was produced. So either it was the same person on the documents who stole my money or they were able to get hold of someone else's documents, or the documents were faked.

 

I never received the drone. And yes, I have complained to my bank but have been told that I was not covered as I willingly parted with the money. They also told me to put it behind me and consider myself lucky that it wasn't a lot more. Which is exactly what I would expect them to do the next time they get defrauded as well.

 

So everything is up in the air at the minute. I suppose that this week will see a fresh round of calls and emails from my bank, Barclays and Action Fraud.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mickrick...

 

Trust me you could sue Barclays but they are not at fault here... I think you should take this a lesson and be careful next time.

I get where you are coming from i genuinely do... And I wish we could be of some help. But Barclays are not at fault.

 

FKO

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mick,

 

And yes, I have complained to my bank but have been told that I was not covered as I willingly parted with the money. They also told me to put it behind me and consider myself lucky that it wasn't a lot more.

 

Was your complaint to the bank in writing ?

 

Was the response above their actual words or your summary ?

 

If you haven't yet put the bank complaint in writing, you should do so, and tell them you require their written reply.

 

Same for Action Fraud.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is almost exactly word for word what the bloke from Santander's security team told me on the phone when I called them to report the [problem].

 

 

I really don't see any point in trying to pin the blame on Santander as all they did was provide me with the means to transfer the money.

 

 

In an ideal world I would still say it is Barclays which is at fault for facilitating the fraud by allowing a criminal to open an account with them.

 

 

I would put money on its (if I had any left to put on it) that the [problem]mer used stolen or falsified documents to open the account and that he wasn't who he said he was, something which Barclays should have detected had its security procedures been stringent enough.

 

s-super-complaint-453196/"]This is the link to Which?'s site outlining the reasons for its "super complaint".

 

 

Hopefully soon the banks will start to cover victims of bank transfer fraud, just as it does for victims of direct debit and credit card fraud. There really is no legitimate reason why they don't already.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Action fraud will take months just to send you a template letter.

Your best bet would be to find a pro-active local copper who takes ownership of the case and goes to Barclays to get the fraudster address.

They can then visit this lowlife and hopefully he's stupid enough to be the person on the passport living at the registered address.

However, these fraudster usually are people who used to live in uk and now are abroad, the [problem] people and then withdraw money from abroad.

If this is the case, even though the passport is genuine, you will not be able to do anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Action fraud will take months just to send you a template letter.

Your best bet would be to find a pro-active local copper who takes ownership of the case and goes to Barclays to get the fraudster address. If this is the case, even though the passport is genuine, you will not be able to do anything.

 

Yeah, Action Fraud is about as useful as a chocolate teapot. Just give him a CRN and move on to the next one.

 

Coincidentally, I was watching Rip-Off Britain just now and it was all about bank account fraud. I couldn't watch anymore after about the first ten minutes, I was so incensed.

 

The biggest problem I have is that I live in Belfast,while the fraudster's address (real or otherwise) is in Loughborough. So it would be pretty hard for me to get a local police officer on the case. The best I can hope for in the short term is if there was any money left in the account before he had a chance to empty it, which is clutching at straws. Even if there were, it would be shared out among all of his victims and I'm not kidding myself that I was the only person he preyed on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is almost exactly word for word what the bloke from Santandericon's security team told me on the phone when I called them to report the [problem].

 

And theres your problem. Put it in writing and its guaranteed theyll never say that. The phone reps are NOT trained or qualified to give out such advice. Thats why you need to put thing in writing so they go to people who are.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, Action Fraud is about as useful as a chocolate teapot. Just give him a CRN and move on to the next one.

 

Coincidentally, I was watching Rip-Off Britain just now and it was all about bank account fraud. I couldn't watch anymore after about the first ten minutes, I was so incensed.

 

The biggest problem I have is that I live in Belfast,while the fraudster's address (real or otherwise) is in Loughborough. So it would be pretty hard for me to get a local police officer on the case. The best I can hope for in the short term is if there was any money left in the account before he had a chance to empty it, which is clutching at straws. Even if there were, it would be shared out among all of his victims and I'm not kidding myself that I was the only person he preyed on.

 

The local police officer can obtain the fraudster address from Barclays and then contact the closest police station to that address to visit and possibly arrest them.

The greatest problem is to find an officer who would take ownership of the case.

In my experience they see loss of money as a very low priority and most times they say that it's a civil matter.

It might be different in Ireland, but in London they are really too stretched to deal with people being defrauded.

Wrong, but that's the way it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mick,

 

That is almost exactly word for word what the bloke from Santander's security team told me on the phone when I called them to report the [problem].

 

I really don't see any point in trying to pin the blame on Santander as all they did was provide me with the means to transfer the money.

 

We understand you're hacked off about this but we're suggesting how you can have a better chance of tackling the situation. We're aware of the Super Complaint being made by Which? but this is unlikely to assist you directly in getting your money back.

 

It's not about "trying to pin the blame on Santander". The only chance you have of redress through the bank system is via your OWN bank as you have no contract with Barclays. When you complain to Santander, they will raise the matter via the banks' internal systems and discuss it with Barclays. I'm not saying you'll definitely get your money bank by this means but it's your only option at this stage (apart from the suggestion made by King12345).

 

If you rely on the phone to complain you will get nowhere. Unless and until you put a formal complaint in writing, you stand no chance of getting redress.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...