Jump to content


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1167 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hope someone with legal knowledge can help with this matter,

 

 

We have sold our house in scotland and complete in 4 weeks.

We have since discovered we have an inhibition order that was renewed for an old CCJ obtained in England that we need to get lifted.

 

 

The story is this.

 

We had a default judgement registered in england in january 2008 for 19k by a debt collection company.

We went to court to get it set aside/defend as we were living in Scotland at that time.

We were challenging jurisdiction and the amount plus.

 

 

The judge issued a revised order in may 2008 amending the original judgement to £8k and requesting claimants to instigate mediation thereafter.

No order was made about jurisdiction.

 

 

We subsequently also found out after the judgement that PPI was included and the agreement has a false signature.

This information was not available to us at the time of the second judgement in May 2008.

 

The claimants registered the original CCJ in Scotland so they could pursue which resulted in an inhibition order,

however, the inhibition order was issued in 2010 quoting the original CCJ in default issued in January 2008 of £19k and not the revised amount detailed at the hearing in May 2008 .

The 5 year period expired and the inhibition was renewed in feb 2015.

 

Is the inhibition valid given it quotes A CCJ amount that was subsequently amended by the court?

 

What can we do to get it lifted quickly?

We have subsequently moved back to England.

 

Would appreciate any help available.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We subsequently also found out after the judgement that PPI was included and the agreement has a false signature.

This information was not available to us at the time of the second judgement in May 2008.

 

 

tell us more please

 

 

shame its 2008 as the above could be useful to getting it nulled [ the org CCJ]

but after 8yrs .. a tall order.

 

 

not 100% sure what you can do...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

and?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 year later...

would be nice if you took the trouble to update cag upon your thread...we helped you ...now help us...

 

many members helped you get help

 

cag relies upon resolution to threads so others like you can find and read about how to solve their like issues...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...