Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It is the usual rubbish.   It is cunningly designed to frighten you because it uses some words designed to provoke an emotional response such as Bankruptcy, charging, Warrant etc.   If you read it carefully it can be summed up as follows:   1. You were wise enough not to engage with us before and we are a bit pissed about that.   2. Because we are pissed but can do nothing else we are trying to frighten you with all the things someone else COULD (but probably wouldn't) do with keywords. Only our client and his solicitor could if they had a case.   3. More keywords because we are still pissed you have not engaged with us.   4. We have advised our client (though we probably haven't) to refer to solicitors for legal action because 1). we have failed to scare or engage you and 2). we have no power to take legal action ourselves, only solicitors engaged by our clients could do that.   5. We want to help you (for which read we want to help ourselves) and please look at the list of other people who can help you because a). we may be legally obliged to refer you to third party help and b). some of those guys will advise you to engage with us rather than put us to strict proof.   This letter should be filed along with it's envelope.  No need to respond in any way or have any anxiety about this one.
    • you get the council involved then as the noise is nuisance. You will need to keep a diary but whislt you are on to the council you ask them to see if they cna inspect the property as you belive that the works being doen come under building control and possibly breaching the London Fire Acts ( or similar for most cities) hopefully tey will send someone round and then tell you if they are happy or not with what they have seen. That will help you decide how you want to play things
    • Right, FOI requests cant be made to non governmental organisations and the charges wont be ILLEGAL so your mortgage co will read what you have written in such a way as to think tht you dotn know what you are on about and then try and blather or stall things whilst still rokking yu for every penny they can. now commercial mortgage so terms will be vastly different to home purchase and fees are part and parcel fo that game as a court will decide that you knew waht you were letting yourself into. That means you have to come up with somehting more than just pouring out your feelings for us to be able to offer some solid advice   so, sight of morgtage terms, statements of account, why they have got solicitors involved ( arrears?) what was the original interest and was that variable and if so on what basis?   we need to knwo an awful lost abotu how things have got to where they are and we also need to see the numbers so we can at least try an spot anything obvious
  • Our picks

    • Future Comms is a Big Con. How to get out of it. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/417058-future-comms-is-a-big-con-how-to-get-out-of-it/
        • Like
      • 4 replies
    • Future Comms issues. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416504-future-comms-issues/
      • 5 replies
    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
huppelkutje

Landlord now saying my tenancy is 12 months not 6! Help please

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 994 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

In this instance, it goes in your favour, as the default position would be for a 6 month tenancy, which the documentation you have, and your version of the verbal agreement matches. So, you have a 6 month tenancy. The LL/LA would probably not waste time chasing after you without concrete evidence that you agreed to a 12 month term, because as experienced landlord/letting agent, they'd know it wouldn't be worth the cost of risking a court finding in your favour (which they probably would).

 

 

You are not responsible for the council tax once you move. Write, by recorded delivery, to the local authority council tax department and inform them that your tenancy is up and you have moved out and provide the date. Keep a copy of the letter.

 

If you haven't paid your rent, pay it. The deposit is for damages to the flat, and you cannot use it to defray the cost of rent unless the LL agrees to this. It will be easy to claim your deposit back, and the 12 months indicated on the protection certificate is largely immaterial once you inform them that the tenancy is over and the 12 month protection was an error on the LL's part - provide them with your paperwork to prove the 6 month term.

 

This is very useful thank you. Not 100% sure about the deposit though; I received a reply from Shelter and they told me that I will have difficulty getting my deposit back if the LL doesn't agree with the minimum term. I have emailed the LL again to say that I've moved out & the property is clean & empty and that I have signed paperwork stating 6 months. I've asked them to send me what they have on file for the property. I think that by law if they do have a TA then I should have a copy too.


:whoo:Officially debt free October 2011 after 10 years 11 months :whoo:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm...yes I agree site team members should be seeking to provide constructive TLA-free* help in a friendly manner even if they think a poster has done something silly or careless.

 

And, you never said you signed a legally binding contract so this bit was both acerbic and wrong:

 

Another T who signs a legally binding Contract without first reading/checking.

 

Site team members are just normal humans. I don't think there is a qualification requirement.

 

*TLA - Three Letter Acronym :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is very useful thank you. Not 100% sure about the deposit though; I received a reply from Shelter and they told me that I will have difficulty getting my deposit back if the LL doesn't agree with the minimum term. I have emailed the LL again to say that I've moved out & the property is clean & empty and that I have signed paperwork stating 6 months. I've asked them to send me what they have on file for the property. I think that by law if they do have a TA then I should have a copy too.

 

Stop right there!

Did you leave the property without having the LL or LA around to do a final check???

If the answer is yes you will find a long list of made up damage to screw your deposit.

If the property is still empty ask the LA or LL to do a final inspection together, however, now that they have the keys, they probably won't do that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stop right there!

Did you leave the property without having the LL or LA around to do a final check???

If the answer is yes you will find a long list of made up damage to screw your deposit.

If the property is still empty ask the LA or LL to do a final inspection together, however, now that they have the keys, they probably won't do that.

 

Yes I did but I had to fly abroad at short notice.. the LL and LA were both shut for the weekend and no answer to phone calls. I tried to get in touch to arrange handing the key over but couldn't. There was absolutely no choice I had to go straight away. I could have flown back just to do the handover but the LA has assured me that they will find new tenants.

 

There was no itinerary when I moved in and no tenancy agreement so I don't believe they can deduct anything. I doubt they'll trash the place, and even if they do I took very detailed before & after photos, plus there is a huge demand for property in that area and I don't think they'd waste their time when they could very easily get new tenants.


:whoo:Officially debt free October 2011 after 10 years 11 months :whoo:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes I did but I had to fly abroad at short notice.. the LL and LA were both shut for the weekend and no answer to phone calls. I tried to get in touch to arrange handing the key over but couldn't. There was absolutely no choice I had to go straight away. I could have flown back just to do the handover but the LA has assured me that they will find new tenants.

 

There was no itinerary when I moved in and no tenancy agreement so I don't believe they can deduct anything. I doubt they'll trash the place, and even if they do I took very detailed before & after photos, plus there is a huge demand for property in that area and I don't think they'd waste their time when they could very easily get new tenants.

 

The before and after photos will probably save the day, well done

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Date stamped in/out photo's should assist OP in any proposed deposit deductions for alleged T damage, but nothing else.

When I mention 'vacating' I am referring to AST, not property. In this case, it would appear OP made no attempt to return keys (implied surrender), and there is no case Law suggesting T was legally .vacated

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
it would appear OP made no attempt to return keys (implied surrender), and there is no case Law suggesting T was legally .vacated

 

The property was vacated 2 months before the end of the tenancy. The tenant has said in passing that s/he was unable to contact the agent. S/he has not said that s/he has never handed back the keys. The agency have apparently accepted that it was vacated as they are talking about re-letting it.

 

This is entirely different to vacating on the last day without telling the agent or returning the key, and the agent thereby being in a position to demand further rent because a periodic tenancy has begun.

 

The comment is either designed to wind up the original poster and justify the initial "acerbic" comment, or is assuming a worst case scenario and criticising the poster without seeking further clarity.

The original poster has already said that s/he finds an "acerbic" approach by a "site team member" to be unhelpful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did try to return the keys but couldn't get in contact with either LA or LL. In the end I left them in a safe place and then let the LA know where they were as they had said they would seek new tenants. With no TA I didn't know who I should be giving them to which is why I didn't post them to either office.

 

I've just seen that OFT has guidelines for landlords that state a tenancy agreement should be given to a tenant before the date the keys are handed over, and before a deposit for the property is taken. Is this ever enforced, and what happens if a LL doesn't abide by the guidelines? I can't remember the last time I had a TA and whether it was provided in advance before the move-in date (I suspect not). Does a TA become less legally-binding if a T is not given time to inspect it? I'd never really thought about it before, but when starting a new job the contract is always posted well in advance of the start date.


:whoo:Officially debt free October 2011 after 10 years 11 months :whoo:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I did try to return the keys but couldn't get in contact with either LA or LL. In the end I left them in a safe place and then let the LA know where they were as they had said they would seek new tenants. With no TA I didn't know who I should be giving them to which is why I didn't post them to either office.

 

I've just seen that OFT has guidelines for landlords that state a tenancy agreement should be given to a tenant before the date the keys are handed over, and before a deposit for the property is taken. Is this ever enforced, and what happens if a LL doesn't abide by the guidelines? I can't remember the last time I had a TA and whether it was provided in advance before the move-in date (I suspect not). Does a TA become less legally-binding if a T is not given time to inspect it? I'd never really thought about it before, but when starting a new job the contract is always posted well in advance of the start date.

 

My view is that if a LL doesn't prepare and signs a TA is either dodgy or very naive.

Personally I email the TA to the tenant a few days before meeting to sign it.

Then at the meeting I go through every point asking if is understood.

Lately I have also audio recorded the meeting to avoid the excuse "I signed without knowing what I was signing".

By doing all of this I protect myself and the tenant, leaving no grey areas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no legal obligation to have a written tenancy agreement.

 

Guidelines are guidelines, they are not law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is no legal obligation to have a written tenancy agreement.

 

Guidelines are guidelines, they are not law.

 

Very true, but giving your house to a stranger without a written contract can only mean one thing for both parties: Trouble!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lately I have also audio recorded the meeting to avoid the excuse "I signed without knowing what I was signing".

By doing all of this I protect myself and the tenant, leaving no grey areas.

 

I was thinking about this and wishing that I'd done the same. Do you tell them that you're recording the conversation? Can it be used as evidence only if both parties were aware they were being recorded?

 

The LA has found a new tenant to move in to my old place, hopefully a couple of days before the start of the next rental period. I am keeping my fingers crossed that the LL will agree to it, as I assume that they won't take rent from both parties for the same month.


:whoo:Officially debt free October 2011 after 10 years 11 months :whoo:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was thinking about this and wishing that I'd done the same. Do you tell them that you're recording the conversation? Can it be used as evidence only if both parties were aware they were being recorded?

 

The LA has found a new tenant to move in to my old place, hopefully a couple of days before the start of the next rental period. I am keeping my fingers crossed that the LL will agree to it, as I assume that they won't take rent from both parties for the same month.

 

Yes, I do tell them and give them a copy of the recording.

If they are not trying to screw you they'll have no objection.

Alarm bells should start ringing if one of the parties strongly objects to be recorded: Most likely they're already planning to say that something was or was not said.

At that point I would walk away.

In my experience doing everything above board as a LL restricts drastically the number of potential tenants, but then again, do we want to battle for unpaid rent, damage etc?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...