Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I purchased a Macbook pro from very.co.uk but after 2 weeks is stopped working completely, I talked to very.co.uk electrical support and they agreed it couldn't be fixed and asked me to return the item. I returned the item and very.co.uk refunded my cc.   However I then received a letter stating that I needed to remove the MacBook from my apple account so that the machine could be accessed by very.   I ignored this at first as I thought it was a mistake as they had refunded me. However then I received a bill from them, they had added the cost of the Macbook to my account credit account on very!   I removed the Macbook from my apple account as requested and messaged them via my account to tell them.   They have now asked for a screenshot of me removing the Macbook from my Apple account, how can I provide a screenshot of an action, one that I've already performed too?   I sent a screenshot of my current devices that are registered to my account, however I can see this running as I purchased a replacement Macbook from another store and it has the same name as the returned one, I am concerned as I have an outstanding balance on my account and am being asked for payment.   There appears to be no method of talking to anyone useful at very.co.uk or of getting anything resolved very easily, they do not appear to have a complaints phone number and only provide a couple of options for complaint subjects online 'Warranty complaint', 'PPI complaint', pr Insurance', I would have thought they were obliged to provide better access than that for customers?   Has anyone had experience of dealing with very.co.uk? what's the best way I can get this resolved?    Can they recharge me for a product that I have returned, and that is faulty?   What can I do if they refuse to accept the screenshot I supplied as proof that I have removed the machine from my Apple account?
    • theft/ GBH/ inciting hate / selling coke to minors - probably out.    parking offences, less problematic.   but there are no absolutes.    
    • In theory you could certainly claim for the value of the improvement but it gets complicated.  You must certainly give notice of any work to be carried out and best to get two quotes.   Lots of time-consuming stuff
    • Ok sorry. Got you load and clear. Yes I will get the statement in the next few days to post here. Threw me there as I didn't think it could be that useful but I will use it. I'm still concerned though as to what would happen if the car broke later down the line during the court process. Would me having paid to fix the car mean that if I win and give the car back to them, they then benefit from me paying out to fix it or could I claim the repair on top of the £8000 I paid for the car if I had no choice but to fix it?
  • Our picks

    • Curry’s cancelled my order but took the money anyway. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423055-curry%E2%80%99s-cancelled-my-order-but-took-the-money-anyway/
      • 12 replies
    • Father passed away - Ardent Credit Services (Vodafone) now claiming he owes money. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423040-father-passed-away-ardent-credit-services-vodafone-now-claiming-he-owes-money/
      • 9 replies
    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 6 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 16 replies
BDaly

Concentrix loses HMRC contract from 2017

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1424 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Some time ago my partner and myself received a letter from HMRC stating that we were no longer entitled to claim working tax credit due to information from Concentrix, we had never heard of Concentrix at this point.

 

 

Apparently the information that was disallowing us from claiming was that on the forms submitted it states I worked just 5 hours per week last year 2015.

The forms we submitted did not state 5 hours / week but rather 30 plus hours per week,

 

 

concerned by this I got in touch with HMRC through the HMRC website online chat system and an employee at HMRC informed us that Concentrix in Belfast had made the alteration to the form

 

The action taken by Concentrix is clearly fraudulent, so that information has been passed on to the serious fraud office in London.

I spoke to a solicitor who said yes I did have a case and yes he would pursue that case when I could get the £200/hour fee he would charge for handleing the case,

 

 

sadly I do have that kind of money at this time mostly due to being off work with a serious gastric disorder, and as I am no longer entitled to work tax credit due to Concentrix fraudulent action

 

 

I am also no longer allowed free prescriptions which meant last week I had to go without medication as we could not afford to get the precription filled at that time.

 

The solicitor suggested I get a group of people together who have also been mis-treated by Concentrix in order to begin a class action lawsuit against them but I have no idea how to go about that currently so am looking around for advise on how I can either get enough people together to get that underway or alternatively find a kind wealthy person to support a private case.

 

If you think that Concentrix have mis-used information to make a case against you or outright changed information you sent them the number for the serious fraud office is... 02072397272.

 

The more people who kick up a fuss about this company and the methods they use then the sooner these issues can be dealt with properly and this company brought to rights.

Edited by antone
Toned down language

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37356646

 

This is good news, albeit in a small way. The firm has caused an inordinate amount of grief in the last few years.


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems as though people are treated as guilty until proven otherwise. Read some of this on Facebook yesterday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The big problem is the reliance on computers producing accurate/useful data and stupid people not questioning it, before they start using it.

 

What is the saying, 'garbage in, garbage out'.

 

It has become like the Little Britain sketch ' Computer says NO and you don't want to argue with it, do you'.

 

There is a story in the Daily Mail today about Banks computers looking at spending activity and causing problems for people when they go on a shopping break in another city. Because the computers detect higher than normal usage away from an account holders home, they are declining some transactions because of possible fraudulent use. It will get to the stage, where you have to start telling your Bank of all trips away from home and not just holidays abroad.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Serious Fraud Office? Really? This is bad, yes, but I'm not sure it's really a job for the SFO and I'm really not sure that we want to be advocating wasting their time.

 

Of course, if Concentrix has falsified something (I wish I could say that they would never do such a thing, but sadly I don't believe that) then the obvious first course is to appeal the decision and then, perhaps, seek support for some sort of Class Action suit. Complaining about being unable to claim TC because of this, and proposing massively expensive litigation as a solution, is surely putting the cart before the horse.

 

Since you have HMRC admitting that they believe that their records are not correct, it should be straightforward to get the decision changed - it probably won't even have to go to an appeals tribunal.

 

I'm certainly supportive, in principle, of fighting against stuff like this, so I think you have done the right thing by talking to a solicitor. In the meantime, is your MP likely to be at all sympathetic?


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've merged a couple of threads on the topic of Concentrix. I'm not at all sorry to see the back of them.


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I raised this with the SFO because I am one of many people mistreated by Concentrix

but really how many of the hundreds if not thousands of people mistreated by them were mistreated by illegally altering records or illegally abusing info they had no right to use/access.

 

 

Also HMRC I would assume have copys of the records/forms we sent to them,

the chap at HMRC clearly stated that the records were altered by Concentrix .

 

 

So I would assume that the record copys of HMRC still hold the correct information so their records would be right,

how else could he confidently state what he did unless he compared the HMRC copy of the form with the Concentrix copy of the form.

 

 

And again assumption on my part that I would not be the only single person in this who has had records altered to fit with the Concentrix view of how things should be.

 

Also I can not confirm the SFO are looking at it I simply passed on the details I have got over to them.

 

To appeal the decision through the Concentrix channels would just get this fraud swept under the carpet never to rear it's head as at the eleventh hour they would simply hold up their hands and claim a mistake was made and reinstate the work tax credit.

 

 

This way if it is more widespread than one individual form then hopefully it will be brought into the light of day for all to see.

Edited by antone
Toned down language

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BDaly, you'll notice that I've had to edit a couple of your posts - the only thing I've changed is the way you presented the company name of Concentrix. I'd ask that you respect this - I don't want to come across as defending that company, but we really have to be careful on CAG.

 

Anyhow, I'm most certainly not trying to dissuade you from taking this matter further, but I would point out that the matter of resolving your own Tax Credit problems and the matter of taking things further are not mutually exclusive. If you have been wrongly refused benefits, you're entitled to those benefits. If, as you contend, the refusal was actually fraudulent, nothing about having your benefit reinstated and backpaid precludes further action.

 

Finally, on the matter of whether or not this is the SFO's remit, well, I don't know. But this article does discuss what the SFO considers its remit to be. If you haven't already seen it, I hope you find it interesting.


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/tax-credits-mother-joseph-rowntree-food-banks-concentrix-a7318896.html

 

Concentrix accuses woman of living with 19th century Quaker Joseph Rowntree. Another woman apparently accused of being in a relationship with RS McColl.


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...