Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So nothing to do with deprivation of capital, but bad choices of how they spend benefit monies.   Sounds like they are on a downward spiral to living on the streets and getting into an even worse situation.
    • 4 th time we've merged your threads  for complete history of your story please keeps to one thread
    • @dx100uk @ anyone else interested in Fighting HSBC UK  Staff/department non compliance and incompetence/interference in between HSBC UK and customers.   I wanted to know what you guys had to say about the reply i got from HSBC UK today.    Recap. I originally turned to HSBC UK to be reunited with Money i saved in accounts that where frozen and made dormant during the year 1995.   HSBC UK Teams tell me that HSBC UK only allows them to have access to account records dated back 6 years. there for they do not have the records, can not locate the records i requested for in my SAR. there for HSBC UK teams Ignored my SAR application for records of accounts made frozen and dormant during the year 1995. HSBC then claim if the accounts where closed they will no longer hold records of these accounts and tell that to the ICO. I again explained to HSBC UK and the ICO the records of accounts where left frozen and dormant.   HSBC UK teams continue to tell me over the phone that The records i requested for in my SAR, will not be located or do not exist because HSBC only allows them to have access to records of accounts dated back 6 years.    I returned to HSBC highlighting there is no such provision in the Data Protection Act.   HSBC UK teams today totally ignored my complaint again and confirmed with me they are classing my complaint as wanting to locate accounts that where closed.   Let me know what you think about the  HSBC UK teams response to my last complaint. Is there any other letters i can send them to confirm thay are not correct about what they have done.    The HSBC UK letter starts of by:You've been unable to recover funds you held in HSBC UK Accounts that were closed in 1994 to 1995, and to obtain the account details for the accounts concerned. You've been advised that we only retain records for up to 6 years, but you've been unable to locate any provision for this within the Data Protection Act (DPA). You require a Certificate of Destruction from HSBC UK to evidence the destruction of the data concerned. You feel your Subject Access Request (SAR) has been ignored by HSBC UK.   HSBC UK Teams now go on to explain: In respect of you being advised we only retain records for up to 6 years, but having been unable to locate any  provision for this within the Data Protection Act (DPA), I can confirm that under the DPA, we are obliged to only keep records for as long as we deem necessary, in order to effectively manage our data. So, for most cases, this will be for no more than 6 years.   In regards to your request for a Certificate of Destruction from HSBC UK to evidence the destruction of the data concerned, I regret that this isn't something that we can provide, as we don't keep records of when individual customer data was destroyed. I'd also like to clarify that if the accounts concerned were closed after becoming dormant, that we would have sent you closing statements at the time.   Lastly, I'm sorry you feel we've ignored your SAR. I want to assure you that we'll always look to accommodate a request for a SAR as best as we can. However, if we're unable to locate the account details and information required, this will mean we're unable to fulfil the request, which has unfortunately been the case on this occasion.   How else do you think i can highlight to HSBC that the teams dealing with My complaint, and request to be reunited with my money is not going to departments that can deal with my demand for services.?  
    • Hi   I have to agree if you have paid off the debt owed to them via this meter and are up to date on your bills  I would look at changing supplier and as said asking new supplier to install a standard meter and look for the best deals for you.
    • I have severe anxiety and going to leave my job and have been invited to a meeting but dont wish to attend that is three hours away from where I am. Can I legally give the  permission to decide without my being there? I cannot handle going as I know I'm going to be fired anyway as on my final warning. I'm also giving in my notice this week too! This job is just too much for me now and I cannot work here any longer. It's no good for my health and sanity  I am sick to my stomach thinking about going and about to hand my notice in anyway    
  • Our picks

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1156 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

discussion thread created

please spa here rather that on a live thread everyone

 

 

dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would hazard a guess that you are not a new user of this forum at all. The use of the word 'EA' always gives you away and where there is doubt.....you only have to look at the hostile way in which you post.

 

What a very strange and peculiar thing to suggest?

 

There are at least 3 other people who use the term "EA" on this thread, including the person that I was responding to.

 

I have no idea who you are, or who you think I am but it's a bit ripe to suggest that I am hostile.

You have been hostile towards me, from your very first post, for no reason (I assume?) other than the fact that I corrected your mistake regarding the position when there are no goods/insufficient goods to take control of. You have further singled me out for a lecture on what I may or may not post and where, despite you not (as far as I can see) being a moderator on this forum.

 

It is no problem to me at all if you want to spit your dummy out over something so trivial as a minor correction.

What I would point out though is that all the hostility appears to be coming from you, and you alone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I quite agree and as such I would like to know the following:

 

1. Why should a debtor be advised to enter into a repayment plan once it has been satisfied that there are no goods on the premises that can be controlled?

 

2. What advantage is there for the debtor to do so?

 

3. Is the debtor obliged to do so?

 

4. Is it in the debtors best interests to do so?

 

5. Is the forum aware of Regulation 24 of the Taking Control of Goods Regulations 2013?

 

6. Would a bailiff company want to force entry before following protocol?

 

7. Would a bailiff have the power/authority to make a decision on whether forced entry may be made?

 

8. Is it a reasonable excuse that authority can not be given because the visit takes place at 6am?

 

9. Is it a reasonable excuse that authority should not be sought because we don't know if the debtor is going to be at home when the visit takes place?

 

10. Should we not request that no goods levies/nulla bona be returned to the courts?

 

I'm really confused here as I would like clarification as to whether the purpose of the forum is to advise debtors or whether the purpose is to assist bailiffs (that is EA's for those who are confused)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
discussion thread created

please spa here rather that on a live thread everyone

 

 

dx

Spar DX I would go to a Spa to partake of the healh giving waters.:)

You spar with a fellow boxer.

 

In the meantime, imagine a bailiff trying to Take Control of the waters in a spa, and having them chucked over him shorting his BWC.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Richard was responsible for much case law that is applicable today.

 

Debtors cannot simply be committed to prison for council tax because they have not dealt with bailiffs. This is a direct result of Richard's work and a legacy that he has left for debtors.

 

Richard exposed many unlawful and illegal warrants, no end of debtors who were illegally and unlawfully jailed, including many vulnerable, sick and poor people.

 

Richards line of work was not the most lucrative, far from it.

 

Richard left his mark and anyone who aspires to help and/or advise debtors should look at Richards work for inspiration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes and not do what a certain person does by charging fees for stupid letters and court attendances that only costs debtors more.

and don't work


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
yes and not do what a certain person does by charging fees for stupid letters and court attendances that only costs debtors more.

and don't work

 

stupid letters are indeed a waste of money but I don't think she goes to court. nor does a "certain person"

 

He went to court last month when he couldn't get a solicitor,

due to them all being booked in other court cases. He got the debtor his car back and costs.

 

Thanks in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Richard was responsible for much case law that is applicable today.

 

Debtors cannot simply be committed to prison for council tax because they have not dealt with bailiffs. This is a direct result of Richard's work and a legacy that he has left for debtors.

 

Richard exposed many unlawful and illegal warrants, no end of debtors who were illegally and unlawfully jailed, including many vulnerable, sick and poor people. I

 

 

 

 

Richards line of work was not the most lucrative, far from it.

 

Richard left his mark and anyone who aspires to help and/or advise debtors should look at Richards work for inspiration.

This is nonesense, even for you.debtors have never seen imprisoned for not dealing with bailiffs,thete is no such offence.


DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, I do not have a television.

i do not watch TV.

I work 12, 14 hours helping people who have bailiff issues.

I post about two people who do nothing to help debtors whatsoever.

I post nothing about you or your forum other than that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is nonesense, even for you.debtors have never seen imprisoned for not dealing with bailiffs,thete is no such offence.

 

You have told debtors yourself that if they don't pay and choose to sit it out that they run the risk of imprisonment

 

When you've answered your previous nonsense, I will give you a more detailed response, if the admin have not banned me by then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You have told debtors yourself that if they don't pay and choose to sit it out that they run the risk of imprisonment

 

When you've answered your previous nonsense, I will give you a more detailed response, if the admin have not banned me by then.

 

Not for failing to deal with the bailiff, not e en for the debt. I hope you don't advise anyone,because your knowledge of enforcement is none existent.


DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not for failing to deal with the bailiff, not e en for the debt. I hope you don't advise anyone,because your knowledge of enforcement is none existent.

 

Yeah that's right.

 

I am paid to work on enforcement issues full time, 6 or even 7 days a week but my knowledge is "none existent" [sic]

 

I rarely advise anyone these days as I don't have the time. I leave it to the "experts" like you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah that's right.

 

I am paid to work on enforcement issues full time, 6 or even 7 days a week but my knowledge is "none existent" [sic]

 

I rarely advise anyone these days as I don't have the time. I leave it to the "experts" like you

 

Good move.


DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...