Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Drydens & Arrow Global chasing old Providian card 'debt'


Robw757
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2782 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Evening Everyone

 

I need some advice on an old cc debt that was sold to arrow global over 6 years ago.

 

No payment or acknowledgement has ever been made to arrow.

The last payment to the original creditor was made over 6 years ago.

 

Drydensfairfax are seeking payment or they will take me to court.

 

 

I have said this is statute barred,

however they say arrow issued a default in 2013 so not SB.

 

 

Bearing in mind I have never acknowledged or paid anything to arrow, are they correct in saying this is not statute barred?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they told you this in writing or over the phone?

 

Dumb DCA.

 

It matters not when the default was placed on the credit file.

 

Have you checked your CRF?

 

If you're discussing this debt with them on the phone, then STOP.

 

If you have told them it is SB in writing, and they are so foolish as to attempt to take this to court, then they will be laughed out of it.

 

Ignore them, check your credit file, it should be clear, of this debt anyway.

 

The only thing you don't ignore is a court claim, and you have the ultimate defence if they are this foolish!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have only spoken to them in writing,

I have checked my CRF and there is a default registered and its shows payments in 2013,

however I can guarantee I have never paid arrow anything so I don't understand what is going on.

 

 

I have been told that arrow are known for registering dodgy defaults?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When did you take the card out?

 

When did you last pay anything towards it?

 

Are you saying that the information on your CRF is incorrect?

 

What name is next to the default marker?

 

What payments does it claim are being made?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The card was taken out in 2001, last payment prob around 2008.

 

It is showing in the closed account section on Clearscore.

 

All it indicates is a missed payment in 2013. It doesn't use the word default. However I know for a fact I have never acknowledged anything to arrow or paid them a penny. So it appears the information is incorrect.

 

Drydens have put the account on hold for 14 days to await my response. They have said that the default date provided by the OC was in 2013, which is within 6 years!

Link to post
Share on other sites

a DCA/debt buyer cant default an account

only the OC can..who was?

 

they would have done this upon sale

as AG have now confirmed?

 

you need to complaint to the OC about the late registering of the default

but you might need to SAR them first and get the data?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As your last payment was in 2008 it is possible that either the OC or a DCA knowing that the debt was almost statute barred that they would have written to you for the money.

 

In response you may then have sent CCAs to them and the £1 payment have been set against your account thus appearing to restart the Limitation time.

 

It is not unknown for DCAs to pay a small amount into a debtor's account also to extend the Limitation period.

 

Those are two of the options that exist if your CRef is saying that payments were made in 2013 if you didn't.

 

Without those payments, the Default date is irrelevant.

The Limitation Act starts when there is a breach of contract followed by the first available time the creditor can take you to Court for the breach.

 

The fact that the default notice is so much later is thus irrelevant and Drydensfairfax should be aware of that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original creditor was providian.

 

I have sent a cca request to Drydens and they sent me a photocopy of a signed application form.

 

Arrow global claim a default in 2013 by the OC,

however no payment or acknowledgement has been made in over 6 years so how can this be correct?

 

They have not provided evidence of any payment or acknowledgment within this time.

 

As far as I am aware Providian do not trade in this country anymore so I am not sure how I can get any details of defaults etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then ignore them, IMO.

 

It matters not what they do with the stat fee, if they choose to reduce it from the debt owing, that's not your problem, it's the stat fee end of.

 

You've told them it's SB, it's for them to prove it isn't, not for you to prove it is.

 

If all they have done is pluck some random figure and date out of their backside, then let them try and con the judge with that evidence.

 

Ignore them, see if they are foolish enough to issue a summons.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

go give Barclaycard a ring.

Providian were sold to monument

monument were taken over by Barclaycard.

 

 

can you scan up the agreement please to PDF

 

 

and how long have you been getting letters regarding this debt over the years

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the cca they sent me.

 

The original credit card does not appear on my credit report.

 

 

Drydens claim the original default date provided by the OC is March 2013.

 

 

This is simply not possible as no payment or acknowledgment has been made in over 6 years.

 

My credit report shows the account held by arrow global with that default date, it does not mention the OC.

 

The last payment made to the OC was in January 2010, so I don't believe it took them 3 years to issue a default.

20160912_081138.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's not a cca return its a postal application form

wheres the rest of the T&C's.

 

a debt buyer name replaces that of the OCwhen the buy a debt

hence the CRA file entry.

 

you can complain to the OC about the late filing of the default

giving them 14 days to resolve it

else off to the ICO

 

so the debt is statute barred anyway tough luck arrows

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing

no need to enter pointless letter tennis

they know the score

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...