Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the xx/xx/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the xx/xx/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, xx/xx/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Letter out of the blue Lloyds/Robinson Way


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2740 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A friend of mine has just advised me that some letters have been sent to me at his home, where I stayed briefly some years ago.At my request he opened one of the letters, they are from MKDP advising me that an outstanding debt for a credit card balance has been assigned to them and any future correspondence should be sent to Moreton Smith Ltd.I did have such an account with the credit card company and whilst I haven't made a payment for well over six years I did correspond with them until about three years ago, their letters became more bizarre and they clearly were not reading my responses so I simply stopped writing.A little over three years ago I moved out of my friends apartment and notified the bank of my new address, neither address is in Europe.So they have written to me at my friends address despite the fact I have given them my current address, he is willing to put them in the post box marked "not at this address" or simply shred them. I am reluctant to keep writting to them advising them of my current address, but would welcome a view.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the system, it only happens with some users tho'. I tend to double space the paras myself.

 

Just ask your friend to send them back marked 'Not At This Address'. When they were assigned/bought the debt they would have received your contact information from the bank, if they can't employ someone who can actually read then tough. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I recently received a statement of account in respect of a Lloyds TSB CC debt

that has been statute barred for a couple of years,

there hasn't even been any communication by either side for a few years.

 

 

The statement was sent by the latest in a long line of DCA's,

and was sent to an address I moved out of about fours years ago,

though the old address is still in this country,

 

 

the letter was poorly addressed, it didn't contain the city or even the country,

it did find me though took a couple of months.

 

 

It was from a DCA in Milton Keynes though posted in Switzerland.

This particular DCA did write to me at my current address about three years ago.

 

 

The letter does no more that outline the debt, it doesn't ask for payment.

 

 

Am I correct in thinking that this couldn't reset the SB clock,

even if it had been sent before the debt was actually SB?

 

 

I'm inclined just to ignore it, I suspect there's nothing to be gained by reminding them it's SB,

given that it was incorrectly addressed to a previous address

maybe I could just bin it and deny ever receiving it.

 

 

Would be grateful for any views, thank you.

 

 

Edit: I'm having trouble formatting this post,

it just appears as one long para, apologies if I can't correct it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing sent by a DCA could reset the SB clock. If it's already expired, nothing can reset it. If it hasn't, only an admission of the debt by you could reset it.

 

I would ignore unless they send something properly addressed and asking for something.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just hope for Data Protection reasons these statements do not contain your personal data.

 

No affect on stature barring. It is a requirement for debt owner to send a statement at least once a year.

 

You should make sure your current address is showing on official records such as credit reference agencies.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What if they don't send an annual statement? Or if they have been sending it to the wrong address because you moved house?

 

Has no affect if they are not sending or not received. But i believe it is a standard requirement by the FCA for creditors to issue regular statements. Whether the FCA has any power to take action against DCA's not issuing statements on the debts they have, i am not sure. Not seen anything written about this. Not as if a debtor is going to complain about a DCA not contacting them.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same sort of letter from MKPD of Milton Keynes. I don't know who they are but they claim to own the debt - well damn decent good of them for letting me know I still owe them money, I look forward to their next letter next year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check your credit file to ensure that reporting of this debt has ceased.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Introduced as part of the CCA 2006 amendments....

 

STATEMENTS TO BE PROVIDED IN RELATION TO REGULATED AGREEMENTS

 

Section 6: Statements to be provided in relation to fixed-sum credit agreements 23 Section 6 inserts a new section 77A after section 77 of the 1974 Act.

Section 77A will require creditors in regulated fixed-sum credit agreements to provide debtors with annual statements in the specified form, the first of which is required within one year of the day after the date on which the agreement was made.

 

24. If a creditor does not give the debtor an annual statement when required to do so, then he is not entitled to enforce the agreement during the period of his noncompliance and the debtor is not liable to pay any interest during this period.

 

These notes refer to the Consumer Credit Act 2006 (c.14)which received Royal Assent on 30 March 2006

 

The debtor is also not liable to pay any default sum (see note in respect of section 18 below) that would have become payable during the period of non-compliance or would have become payable after the end of that period in connection with a breach of the agreement occurring during that period. A creditor will not be required to give the debtor an annual statement if there are no further sums payable under the agreement.

 

Section 7: Further provision relating to statements

 

Section 7 inserts a new section 78(4A) after section 78(4) of the 1974 Act.

 

Section 78(4) of the 1974 Act requires creditors to issue statements to debtors setting out specified information in respect of running account credit agreements at intervals of not more than 12 months. Regulations made by the Secretary of State under the new section 78(4A) may require creditors to include specified information about the consequence of failing to make repayments, or only making minimum repayments, in statements issued under section 78(4) of the 1974 Act.

 

The new subsection (3) makes provision for the giving of statements under sections 77A (inserted by section 6 of the 2006 Act) and 78(4) of the 1974 Act where there is more than one debtor to whom credit is provided.

If there are two or more debtors, a debtor may provide a dispensing notice to the creditor so as to mean that the creditor is not obliged to provide a statement to that debtor. However, dispensing notices will not be effective if that would mean that no debtor will receive a statement under section 77A or 78.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check your credit file to ensure that reporting of this debt has ceased.
How would I do that, I haven't had a UK address for well over six years, over eight in fact. The statement I referred to was sent to an old SE Asia address, the DCO in question, also MKPD, have written to me at my current address.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, I don't know how you would do that then tog ?

 

I will ask someone how you would do this.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

How would I do that, I haven't had a UK address for well over six years, over eight in fact. The statement I referred to was sent to an old SE Asia address, the DCO in question, also MKPD, have written to me at my current address.

 

You can obtain your credit record from abroad, but you have to do it in writing completing a form and sending proof of identity. If you check the Experian UK site it tells you what you need to do.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

A bit of background I had an old LloydsTSB credit card, which I struggled to pay some years ago, and then to be honest I just gave up, I must have stopped paying in about 2006, maybe even earlier, though I don't recall ever getting a notice of default.

 

The last communication from me was in August 2008 notifying them of my change of address, it was a generic letter not really admitting liability, but I suspect that as was eight years ago any conceived admission would have been meaningless by now.

 

I had a letter from TSB in September 2008 offering a 60% discount on the debt this offer was sent to my old address, I didn't respond. In September 2011 I received an assignment notice from MKDP sent to my old address, I didn't respond. Today I had forwarded to me a letter from Robinson Way, it was sent to a previous address but with an incorrect post code.

 

They talk about a debt to HPH2 LTD (ex Lloyds Overseas). They say that they've been trying to contact me, I don't believe them, they then go onto list of things they may consider, asking for a CCJ to be issued, they can't as they know I live in SE Asia, sacrificing my first born, sending a report to a credit reference agency or phone me on the numbers they have on file.

 

My thinking is to totally ignore the latest template, is the correct approach, I'm assuming the five year old letter from MKDP wouldn't have reset the clock? Edit - I'm having a problem with paras.

Edited by maroondevo52
paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore. Old statute barred debt they can't do anything with, apart from send letters. As you say, they know you are outside the UK, so they can't get a CCJ, unless they deliberately gave a court false information and then they would be wasting money on court fees they would never get back.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't forget that hoist robbersway MKDP are all the same company now.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice guys, thanks also for combining the threads, I'd forgotten I'd asked the same question five years ago - it's an age thing.

 

 

I missed the bit about getting a credit report, I'll do it now, will DCA's be alerted to the fact that I've requested a report?

 

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice guys, thanks also for combining the threads, I'd forgotten I'd asked the same question five years ago - it's an age thing.

 

 

I missed the bit about getting a credit report, I'll do it now, will DCA's be alerted to the fact that I've requested a report?

 

 

Thanks again.

 

I think there is a different process for getting a UK credit report from abroad. I think you have to complete a form, then send it to say Experian with the fee required (£2 ?) and some form of identity. Have a look into it. I don't think you can just apply online from abroad.

 

When you complete the info required by the CRA, they will update your details. I think any update does trigger a report on your file that is accessed by debt companies who own your debt.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Uncle

 

 

I've actually carried out a Trust Online search on my old address which shows nothing on the CCJ front, I might still do an Experian one in due course, though you seem to be correct that it cannot be done online from overseas.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Another letter arrived today, it took six weeks as they, Robinson Way, used an incomplete old address, all credit to the local postal service that it actually found me, name, name of road and country.

 

This time they offered me a payment plan.

 

I've found an old letter where they offered to settle for a third of the amount claimed, that letter was dated August 2008, I wonder why they are sending letters again after all the years, maybe they think I will suddenly roll over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...