Jump to content


Ethical Parking Contractual Breach Charge Shoreham airport


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1277 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Hope everyone had a good bank holiday.

 

I (and three others!) missed crap signage and got a Contractual Breach Charge from Ethical Parking on my windscreen over the weekend. Just double checking that it is currently still best to do nothing until a notice to keeper arrives (between 28 and 56 days) before I take any action on one of these?

 

Then if it (NTK) arrives on time post photos of it and signage on here for assistance?

 

Just don't want to get it wrong! Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Yes wait for the NTK before doing anything, if possible, go back now and take photos of the signs etc.

 

''ethical'' parking!!! Ha ha ha ha, who dreams up these names??

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, it depends on whether the money they claim is a contractual condition of parking or damages for a breach of contract. the 2 are not interchangeable so the wording of the sign will decide whether they are getting that right or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Oh yes you're right.

 

I didn't even see that when i returned a second time to take more photos!

I'd really rather not have to drive back again.

 

We approached to park on the left anyway

. These signs seem to only refer to the enclosed car park to the right hand side

 

. All in all the signage is a joke.

No one could be expected to see it

 

. Is there enough here to tell them to bog off or do I really need to return?

(I had taken a video but i can't seem to find it annoyingly).

Link to post
Share on other sites

the point is that if the signage is different they cannot offer a contract but merely be an invitation to treat.

 

If the wording on the little signs has extra conditions you agree you then the main signs arent the contract or offer of a contract just an advertisement that you can ignore if you wish.

 

However, the sign you show talks of a contractual agreement and obligation and then the demand says it is for a breach of contract

 

. Well, they cant both be right but together they can be wrong

 

. In short, have you agreed to pay them a sum or is it a penalty for breach of contract, you cannot agree to break a contract at the outset!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So to try to make this clearer

we entered as per the first photo and parked on the left

- roughly where the fourth car along is (the blue one sticking out).

 

We then walked to the doors straight ahead in the second photo (to a cafe in that building) across the grass where the man is

- four of us saw no signage.

Which is because there is no adequate signage.

 

The only signs are on the right (which is a separate enclosed area), way over about 100m in the distance to the very right of the main building and on the fence on the left in the first photo

- but it would be behind you over the passengers left shoulder as you entered!

(I'm sorry but the file manager says I can't add any more photos)

Link to post
Share on other sites

what to do?

Up to you really.

 

You can appeal and tell them their NTK is not compliant with para 8 of the POFA and thus no keeper liability can be created and leave it at that.

(dont tell them the exact reason it isnt compliant, the sods will jsut send out another one and claim the first letter was a mailshot and not the NTK.

 

If they still want to argue after your letter

then you can play letter tennis with them about invitations to treat,

difference between a contractual obligation and breach of contract etc

but they wont understand,

they just want money and will ignore logic and proof if they think you might yield and pay them so they will keep on.

 

I would suggest you send the first letter denying a liability and leave it at that.

 

if they threaten legal action then use the other arguments to show that you have tried to be reasonable because they wont like to have them shown to a judge, who will know better then them which argument prevails and the onus is on them to PROVE they are right all of the time

Link to post
Share on other sites

Upload stuff as pdf

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, do I actually sign the letter? I put my name on it but I thought I remembered reading somewhere not to sign or am I mistaken? I just don't want to "trip up on a technicality" at this stage. Thanks again.

Edited by q.q.qlp
more info
Link to post
Share on other sites

doesn't matter

even if they get your sig what the hell can they do with it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no its not like theres a signed agreement that they cant find like credit card or loan claimforms under the CCA.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There have been instances of signatures been applied to copies of documents that were never signed. No example from a parking co ever come to light though but taking a precautionary measure like this will show the origin of any dusputed signature should someone start to dig through the sewer they seem to frequent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi,

 

I was hoping this would just go away after my letter telling them to bog off but following on from the above thread this "final reminder before debt recovery" letter has arrived and threatens action from "debt recovery specialists" if I don't pay £60 within 28days which sounds a bit scary (ie two big blokes booting my door in and taking my TV type scary).

 

What is my next action?

EthicalFinalReminder.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...