Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1st letter image.pdf1st letter 2nd page.pdf
    • Many thanks for the replies and advice!   I what to send this email to the Starbucks CEO and the area manager. Your thoughts would be appreciated.   [email protected] [email protected]   Re: MET Parking PNC at your Starbucks Southgate site   Dear Ms Rayner, / Dear Heather Christie,   I have received a Notice to Keeper regarding a Parking Charge Notice of £100 for the driver parking in the Southgate Park Car Park, otherwise infamously known as the Stanstead Starbucks/McDonalds car park(s).   Issued by: MET Parking Services Ltd Parking Charge Notice Number: XXXXXXXXX Vehicle Registration Number: XXXX XXX Date of Contravention: XX.XX.XXXX Time: XX:XX - XX:XX   After a little research it apears that the driver is not alone in being caught in what is commonly described as a scam, and has featured in the national press and on the mainstream television.   It is a shame that the reputation of Starbucks is being tarnished by this, with your customers leaving the lowest possible reviews on Trustpilot and Trip Advisor at this location, and to be associated with what on the face of it appears to be a doubious and predatory car park management company.   In this instance, during the early hours of the morning the driver required a coffee and parked up outside Starbucks with the intention of purchasing one from yourselves. Unfortunately, you were closed so the driver walked to McDonalds next door and ordered a coffee, and for this I have received the Notice to Keeper.   It is claimed that the car park is two separate car parks (Starbucks/McDonalds). However, there is no barrier or road markings to identity a boundary, and the signage in the car park(s) and outside your property is ambiguous, as such the terms would most likely be deemed unfair and unenforcable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   I understand that Starbucks-Euro Garages neither operate or benefit from the charges imposed by MET Parking. However, MET Parking is your client.   Additionally, I understand that the charge amount of £100 had previously been upheld in court due to a ‘legitimate interest in making sure that a car park was run as efficiently as possible to benefit other drivers as well as the local stores, keeping cars from overstaying’.   However, this is not applicable when the shop or store is closed (as was the case here), as there is no legitimate interest. Therefore, the amount demanded is a penalty and is punitive, again contravening the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   As the driver’s intention of the visit was genuine, I would be grateful if you could please instruct your client to cancel this Notice to Keeper/Parking Charge Notice.   Kind regards
    • I received the promised call back from the Saga man today who informed me that the undertakers have decreed it IS a modification and they will need to recalculate a quote individually for me. However it all sounds very arbitrary. The more I think about it, and with help from forum replies, the more I am sure that it is not a modification. If for example the original seatback had become damaged by a spillage or a tear, I would be entitled to replace it with the nearest available part. The problem is when it comes to a payout after an accident, there is no telling what an individual insurer will decide when he notices the change. I am still undecided which of the two best routes to go with, either don't mention the replacement at all, or fill in the quote form without mentioning, and when it comes to buying the insurance over the phone, mention it at the time.
    • Please post up their letter so we understand what they've asked. You need to cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • Hello,  I received the standard letter.  I don't understand No. 3: If this is in relation to a ticket irregularity, then if you were unable to produce a pass because you did not have it with you or if your pass was withdrawn because you were unable to produce a valid photocard to accompany it, please enclose a photocopy of the pass/photocard with your reply. Question: do i enclose my photocard? my partner's freedom pass was confiscated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Death of estranged father in law - Estate


batleyboy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2791 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was wondering if some kinds souls could offer some direction.

 

 

My wife's father ( who has been estranged for approx. 20 years ) has passed away. She has bee informed by her Uncle that there is no will so it falls to my wife and her brother as beneficiaries.

 

 

Her Uncle asked if he could be executor of the estate and gone as far as to assign a solicitor. On contact by the solicitor to see if my wife agrees to this, she said no. My wife and brother in law would like to be executor.

 

 

The fear is that the Uncle will not take kindly to this and may be ...obstructive. How would be best to ensure we obtain all relevant accounts ( there are a few by all accounts) and keys to the property.

 

 

We are looking to instruct a solicitor to handle but firstly want to get a ball park figure as to the estate size.

 

 

Any guidance / thoughts appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll need a death certificate and ideally knowing the banks where the money is.

If you don't know you can check your fil credit report (when I say you I mean your wife which is one of the beneficiaries)

Then you can go to the bank and ask for account balance.

Not much the uncle can really do apart from stealing money if he's got access to your fil bank cards.

But any transaction made after death will be easily identifiable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll need a death certificate and ideally knowing the banks where the money is.

If you don't know you can check your fil credit report (when I say you I mean your wife which is one of the beneficiaries)

Then you can go to the bank and ask for account balance.

Not much the uncle can really do apart from stealing money if he's got access to your fil bank cards.

But any transaction made after death will be easily identifiable.

 

 

Ok so we can submit credit requests on the FIL, any ideas how? Didn't realise that. I am sure they will oblige with the house keys etc. It's the accounts which would be the ones to "slip their mind". So all accounts ( savings accounts etc) show on a credit report...pardon my ignorance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so we can submit credit requests on the FIL, any ideas how? Didn't realise that. I am sure they will oblige with the house keys etc. It's the accounts which would be the ones to "slip their mind". So all accounts ( savings accounts etc) show on a credit report...pardon my ignorance.

 

As far as I know and looking at my own credit report, all accounts, credit cards and loans are listed there.

Once you know which banks to contact, make an appointment and bring id and death certificate so they can give you a balance figure.

They're usually very sympathetic in these situations

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look at the following link, you will need to check all 3 cra's as not all companies report to all cra's

 

http://www.experian.co.uk/consumer/questions/askjames264.html

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the first instance, and before any other action is taken, the executor must receive legal ratification of his or her right to take control of the assets in the estate. This requires them to apply for a Grant of Probate from the Probate Registry, which it will be necessary to produce before any bank or other relevant institution will hand over control of assets.

 

Then you can deal with your Uncle.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

In any case, if there's no will, your uncle would not have any right to be appointed as executor unless the beneficiaries agree.

Bear in mind that as Andyorch pointed out, you'll need to apply for grant of probate and do it quite quickly.

The probate registry office is quite efficient in my experience, but the last thing you want is a mistake giving your uncle legal status as executor.

First of all I would write to your uncle solicitor denying in very clear terms permission to act as executor and explaining that he's got to stay out of this matter.

Then contact the banks and let them know that there's a possibility that unauthorised transactions might take place so they can block them (your uncle might have access to online banking or bank cards, cheque books etc.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

uncles solicitor has now been in touch asking my wife to revoke her entitlement to the estate ( probably awful wording).

 

 

She would like to refuse this and also advise that she would like, alongside her brother, deal with the estate and also requires any information on the estate that the uncle currently holds .

 

 

Could someone help us word this please? Speaking to the uncle it is their request that any information is requested in this fashion :-(

 

 

sounds odd but currently we don't even have a death cert / address

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im sure he means revoke your request to act as Executor...he cant ask revoke her entitlement to the estate...shes the main joint beneficiary:-D

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im sure he means revoke your request to act as Executor...he cant ask revoke her entitlement to the estate...shes the main joint beneficiary:-D

 

Or maybe the solicitor is shooting in the dark hoping to get your wife to refuse her inheritance.

Very long shot in the dark!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or maybe the solicitor is shooting in the dark hoping to get your wife to refuse her inheritance.

Very long shot in the dark!

 

Thats unfortunately the suspicion we have king.

uncle believes although no will, that he knows the deceased wishes which did not include my wife.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats unfortunately the suspicion we have king.

uncle believes although no will, that he knows the deceased wishes which did not include my wife.

 

That's irrelevant now though, intestacy rules kick in if there's no will.

 

Are you able to tell us what the letter says about what they want your wife to revoke please?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This sounds like a classic case of the uncle who was close to the deceased and finding it hard to accept that he will not inherit anything.

If it's true that your fil wanted to exclude your wife, he should have left a will.

Too late now, she will share the pot with her brother leaving the uncle dry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...