Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

GE Money - The Personal Loan Express


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2803 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

Been a while!

 

 

I'm trying to arrange a PPI refund on my load with GE Money.

 

 

I've sent them a form detailing my complaint - and they've come back to me today,

saying-

 

They've looked into my unfair PPI claim

They've looked into the commission paid to by the insurer to the lender.

 

They're not going to uphold my complaint, because, according to the copy of the agreement shown

- the loan was dealt with by a broker

'The Personal Loan Express'

 

 

it was taken out in September 2003.

all the boxes were typed in,

and all the boxes ticked for insurance.

 

 

I recall this was all done over the phone, and they told me to sign the forms and send them back, and because of the type of loan it was, i would have to pay PPI.

 

they're not upholding it because

- it's not their problem

- The Personal Loan Express. have gone out of business.

 

 

i can't go to the FOS because it falls out of their remit because the ICOB 'Insurance conduct of business' wasn't started until 2005

 

They've reviewed my account in connection to the relationship between me and GE Money, in respect of the loan agreement being unfair under s104a of the CCA because of undisclosed commission paid by the insurer to the lender/broker.

 

They're not upholding that either

- apparently s104a of the act doesn't apply to the loan agreement,

because the loan agreement was entered into before April 2007,

and redeemed prior to April 2008.

 

 

This also falls out of the FOS jurisdiction.

They've suggested i approach the FLA, closed my complaint and told me politely not to bother contacting them again.

 

Somehow, even after the length of time

- i feel a little short-changed (pardon the pun)

 

 

It's almost like they're saying

'Yes we knew you had PPI, you can't claim because the firms gone bust, and plus too much time has passed.'

 

I've got a copy of the letter which i'm happy to redact and post, as well as the one page of the agreement.

 

Any advice, would be very grateful

 

Cheers

 

Dman

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a similar situation

..they can see my PPI but because it was sold by TPLE they are washing their hands of it all and suggested the Ombudsman

 

 

who have said show me the PPI info so I've sent everything I had,

no documents were ever given to me as far as I can remember,

 

 

The ombudsman has said send all info on th PPI inc the T&Cs which I haven't got so they've said nothing we can do

 

 

... Spoke to GE Money again and they've said we have nothing .

.. So I'm stuck between a rock and a hard place ..

 

 

.Hope you get a resolution though

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's ge money everytime

you'll never get anything out of them.

 

 

best way is an sar.

and try and findout who the insurers were at the time

then go after them.

 

 

if the firm has gone bust

then use the FSCS.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah yes Cardiff rings a bell

 

 

use the search cag box in the top red toolbar

 

 

you'll find them.

just a bit busy

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's ge money everytime

you'll never get anything out of them.

 

best way is an sar.

and try and findout who the insurers were at the time

then go after them.

 

if the firm has gone bust

then use the FSCS.

 

dx

 

Sorry it was the FSCS I've been dealing with .

. nothing they can do without Documents apparently

 

 

...I've given them everything else , proof I had the PPI

, proof it was paid,

a letter from GE Money agreeing all of that

but the inept bunch at FSCS say nothing can be done without original documents ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar time?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you start a new thread

of your own please

and i'll copy your posts over to it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...