Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Beneficial Bank Credit Card - Vintage claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2767 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

When moving house recently i came across a file detailing every statement for a credit card I had in the late 1990's that went into default, eventually leading to a CCJ that took me years to clear. Thankfully I was able to clear it, but at a fairly hefty cost.

 

As a result of the CCJ, the collection agency the debt was sold to by HFC (now HSBC), TBI Financial, added all the interest right up until judgement, and right up until it was paid in full, some four years after judgement in 2007.

 

Thankfully, because I contested some of the charges at the time, TBI were asked by the court to provide evidence of the agreement as well as statements. Copies of every transaction and charge were also forwarded to me.

 

Just before i was about the shred and dispose of all this documentation, I noticed, when glancing at the statements, that I had been paying PPI throughout the time I had the credit card and a large percentage of the CCJ would have been made up of the PPI payments, plus all the interest on this.

 

I know I can lodge a complaint to try and recover the PPI as I believe it was mis-sold at the time as I can remember being told that I would be more eligible for the credit card if I signed up for PPI, even though I was on a fixed term contract at the time. However, I'm sure HSBC will reject it on the basis that they do not keep records dating that far back, plus I suspect that as they sold the debt to TBI, all paperwork would have passed to them.

 

My question is, as I have copies of everything, can I use these assuming the claim is rejected? or is this actually too old to lodge a complaint on in the first place.

 

Any advice would be much appreciated, especially on how to follow this up.

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes you can reclaim.

HFC fleeced everyone blind

and sadly in your case...they got you twice...

 

they handed you on to one of their ex employees at TBI and they fleeced you further..

 

theres as such no legal remit to charge any interest back to the date of assignment to judgement

AND

theres as such no legal remit to allow post judgemental interest either.

so they fleeced you blind.

 

as for the PPI

 

get out the statements

pop each PPI payment individually into the CISHEET spreadsheet.

enter their int rate in cell d15.

end the spreadsheet [claim to date] on the date you made your final payment after the CCJ.

 

pop back and well go from there

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great, thanks for this, will do.

 

i've sent a letter off to HSBC's complaint department and I await their response with interest (no pun intended).

 

The debt when it fell in to default was around £6,000. When I paid the judgement off, accumulated interest, court costs etc... meant the debt had risen to over £15,000.

 

I accept that the debt was all my fault, largely due to circumstances beyond my control, but it did shock me how big the debt soon escalated. It was only due to some fortuitous financial legacy that gave me the opportunity to settle it.

 

To be able to claim back the PPI part would certainly make the mistake easier to swallow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you want scan up all the statements etc

follow the upload

somethings not right here

how can a debt go from £6k to £15k ruddy fleecers

 

 

sadly its not the first time we've seen this

they didit to 1000's of people - hfc were a terrible terrible co. for caring about customers

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is all the data I've been able to gather. It paints a very sad story.

 

Thankfully I have print outs for all the statement dates, all of which were used in the court judgement. TBI applied, and were granted interest at 15% per annum on the debt until I was finally able to pay it off.

 

When the debt went into default, based on my simple calculations, I'd paid the best part of £1,300 over 3+ years.

 

I've not heard back from HSBC as yet, but when they respond with the usual refusal based on not keeping data this old, I'll happily be able to provide them copies.

 

I've even got the paperwork of the transfer of the debt to TBI, who paid over £3,000,000 for the book of bad credit. There is clearly big money to be made from debt collection!

 

Sadly I don't have the first couple of years statements (94-96) but, it's clear that PPI was being charged from day one. Let me know if you need any more detail.

 

Many thanks in advance.

PPI Payments.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's incredible!!

so the CCJ was awarded with 15% PA post judgemental interest.?

 

 

have you still got the judgement or CCJ?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I certainly have.

 

I was reading through it all last night.

 

I also have the final letter from TBI's lawyers, confirming full and final settlement in 2007.

 

I was shocked at the amount I had to pay them.

 

I went down the route of trying to agree a settlement figure which was rejected.

 

To say they were ruthless in their pursuit is an understatement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yea but they ripped people off blind

 

 

so there is a judgement that clearly states post judgemental interest shall be charged at 15%PA until the judgement sum is cleared

or words to the effect?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct.

 

The court papers state 15% per annum until settled.

 

Being able to at least get the PPI back would make it a slightly less bitter pill.

 

Presumably, if the complaint is upheld, which I appreciate is not guaranteed,

 

i'll be able to get the interest back at the rate they charged me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes you work out the % that PPI was of the original PCM figure - say 13%

 

 

so anything you paid on whatever date to whomever = 13% of that is PPI

you then enter these - EACH AND EVERY PAYMENT OF PPI INDIVIDUALLY ON ITS OWN ROW

into the statint sheet.

 

 

how to calc PPI....

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?318646-PPI-Single-Premium-Your-questions-answered(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

 

spreadsheets

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

statint one for ppi

 

 

FOS CQ

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great, thanks for this.

 

I'm still a little confused how to best calculate this.

 

Although I paid PPI from 1994,

I only have statements from 1996 onwards to 1999.

 

So i've entered the actual charges from the statements I do have and over the period from 1996 - 1999.

 

Should I just write off the earlier years as I can't prove it,

although it's obvious I was being charged PPI throughout?

 

For what I can prove,

I paid just over £1,200 in PPI from the period of 1996 - 1999, as per the attached file.

 

I've added all the PPI payments that I have a record for into the calculator

and it looks as if my claim should be for around £16,000

 

I've calculated this on the basis of the 15% i was being charged until the debt was settled 2007

and have kept this rate to calculate to everything to today's date.

 

Does this sound about right?

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

no that's not right

use the statint sheet

[that auto calcs the 8% statint you are entitled too

whatever rate the loan was

or what you got charged later is IMMATERIAL.

 

you can only claim statint [8%] which is what the sheet does automatically.

 

as for the months you do not know what PPI you paid

you are quite within your right to use the avg of all you PPI payment say fot the year before or agter the ones you do not know.

 

so back to what I explained...

the calculation that is all so important.

 

do you have the agreement?

 

total for PPI/total for loan+PPI*100=PPIPCM%

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arr, I see. I've used the wrong calculation spread sheet.

 

 

Yes, I do have the original Credit Card agreement

and I can grab the original interest rate from that and enter the monthly balances from the statements.

I'll give it a go and see how I get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

oopps my bad

dunnno why I thought it was a loan

 

you are correct.

 

the best sheet to use is the FOSRUNNING

but you've not got all the statements

 

so

FOSCISHEET might be the one for you.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've had my final response letter back from HSBC

which states that their belief is that PPI did not exist on the credit card account,

so unless I can prove otherwise,

they have rejected my claim.

 

Thankfully I have evidence that shows that it did have PPI

and copies of statements that clearly show PPI being charged monthly at a rate of £0.72 per £100.

 

I'll reply to HSBC with copies of what I have,

but is there any specific wording I should use when sending the letter?

 

The copies of statements amounts to over 100 pages.

It will be a massive envelope!

 

Do I need to send a copy of every statement?

or do you think I can just send one that shows the account did have PPI?

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop them on a cheap penstick

and send that in or a dvd/CD

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke to HSBC and unfortunately they have said they will not take receipt of a memory stick or DVD. Originals only.

That's fine, I can send them, I'll just add the cost of postage to the claim!

 

I do find it somewhat amazing that the banks can sell you stuff online,

push online banking,

push paperless statements

but, when you raise a complaint you cant send anything by any form of electronic medium!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if I may ask for some help relating to the calculation of my PPI?

 

I've used the spreadsheet and entered as much detail as I have which calculates a figure of £2487.49 for PPI including 8% interest up to the point the card went into default in 1999. So there was an outstanding credit card balance of £7,480.91 which by the time the CCJ came in 2003 was up to over £9,000. (see attached pdf)

 

By the time I was finally able to clear the debt in 2007, it had risen to £19,000. All of this is well documented and I have court correspondence and a letter to confirm full and final settlement from TBI's lawyers.

 

Is my total claim therefore just for the time PPI was charged? or do I take the above figure of £2487.49 and add interest to this figure up to today's date? and if so, at which rate?

 

All help much appreciated.

PPI Calc.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are entitled to claim the 8% stat int up until they settle.

so claim to date runs until then =()today is it the formula?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just in the way of an update, having sent all my statements off to HSBC, they have responded with a mis-selling claim form similar to the FOS one.

 

Having initially claimed they had no record of PPI on the account, they do now at least concede that I was charged PPI.

 

I'll fill it in and send it off. Fingers crossed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you sent them the FOS CQ already though?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I sent them a letter of complaint outlining account numbers for the Credit Card and the reasons why I believed I was mis-sold PPI.

 

The first response was a denial that PPI existed. I then sent Statements showing that it was indeed being charged, and they sent me the claim form.

 

I guess as their original stance was that they didn't charge PPI, it would suggest that their records relating to the account are sketchy at best. However, I'm sure they will now locate additional info which they claim they didn't have. It might now be worth asking for a data SAR. What do you think?

 

I thought I'd been clear in my original letter to HSBC as to why I was complaining against mis-sold PPI, although i'm happy to do it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

id be sending back the fos CQ is post 12

 

 

OC CQ's tend to have questions that loaded in their refusal favour

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...