SIP/Gladstone claimform - PCN Clippers Quay in Salford **WON+COSTS** not paid bailiffs afoot!

[dx100uk]

to ONE PDF please

follow upload

[dx100uk]

who sent you the strike out letter?

[ericsbrother]

obviously you get on to the court and tell them the documents were filed

and you have the proof

 

and demand to know why the matter has ended up like this as a set aside is just that, not a default judgement.

 

You may have to complain to someone at the MoJ

[narrox]

I contacted the courts they have confirmed receipt of the defence, I have now provided them will all evidence of the delivered and signed for defence to both the courts and Gladdys.

 

Ridiculous, the solicitor has a moral obligation to act in a professional manner. They are in receipt of my defence and have chosen not to disclose this, I await to hear back from the courts regarding this.

 

Regarding the payment that's due on the 9th, what will happen as I await advices from the court?

 

Cheers

[ericsbrother]

report the to the SRA

 

No you dont wait for the court to act,

you get back onto them and ask them to put the matter in front of a judge as it was their error that allowed this defective default judgement after it had been struck out.

 

Then find the number for the Ministry of Justice and start a complaint going about the competency of the judgement esp as you were told the claim was struck out etc.

 

 

Shame about the election or you could get your MP to kick Ed Davey.

[narrox]

Okay,

 

So I got all that sorted it was an error with the courts admin they got the documents after all!

 

Now I've got a court date set and the court fee has been paid so I need to get my documents together any tips?

 

What should I be taking with me?

 

Also can you update the thread title as it hasn't been struck out sadly!

 

Thanks!

[dx100uk]

anything you rely upon in you defence/witness statement

inc notes on old cases photos

letter copies etc etc.

 

 

dx

[ericsbrother]

everything yopu can get your hands on, screen shots of other claims that were defeated, pictures taken inthe same light as when you wre there, maps of signs and street lights etc.

[narrox]

Cheers, is there any need to include directions questionnaires that were filed?

[dx100uk]

nope as that a court doc the court will already have

[narrox]

Thanks, wasn't sure if all pre-existing court documents such as Acknowledgement of statement was required when sending the bundle.

[ericsbrother]

no you send the docs you intend to RELY on

 

 

when I say everything I mean everything you can dig up that helps you regardless of how relevant you think it is but certainly everything you want to refer to

 

 

if you say that a case was reported on the MSE forum you copy that thread off and have it with your appended documents, along with a copy of the POFA etc.

Copies of all docs to the claimant's solicitors as well.

[narrox]

Hi all,

 

Just received the bundle from SIP, what do you make of it?

 

Looks like its been put together very quick, I particularly enjoy the part where they say about providing the keeper with an early repayment discount because it says so on the signage... that is for the driver the NTK didn't provide the keeper with any discount.

 

SIP WS.pdf

[dx100uk]

need the exhibits too

[ericsbrother]

quite so,

they don't use the POFA to avoid offering a discount.

 

serves the right that you will raise this matter and that will make the rest of their evidence look suspect as well.

 

Beavis not relevant to their claim

their contract (signage) doesn't describe what a valid ticket is nor how a ticket becomes invalid.

 

Their image of signage doesn't show anything at the entrance to the car park but that is a minor matter because the contract is what is written on the ticket machine, not the signs and you accept the contract when you feed the meter, not upon reading the sign so you will take photographs of the meter and highlight any differences between the wording on there and the signage

 

their contract is rubbish

a list of sites,

no contract at all because if you look at the rest it is an agreement between SIP and SIP.

 

This has been shot down before

(look it up, either the result of a court decision on another post here or on the parking pranksters blog- I will see what I can find)

 

as it doesn't have a complete chain of authority back to the landowner and that is why they have offered this as a contract and not a proper one

 

Hi all,

Just received the bundle from SIP, what do you make of it?

 

Looks like its been put together very quick, I particularly enjoy the part where they say about providing the keeper with an early repayment discount because it says so on the signage... that is for the driver the NTK didn't provide the keeper with any discount.

Edited June 21, 2017 by honeybee13
Paras.

[narrox]

Court day tomorrow!

 

How do I raise the question of 'Right of Audience'

do I simply just ask as to what capacity the representative is operating in and whether they have the Right of Audience,

don't want to annoy the Judge straight away!

 

Thanks all!

[dx100uk]

you've had 3 weeks to research that

[narrox]

Hi all sorry for the late reply!

 

The case was dismissed the judge was not impressed at all, I was awarded costs

 

Gladstone's have now ignored all my correspondence and have not paid the costs as outlined on the judgement, what do I do now contact the courts?

 

Totally unprofessional and no respect for court protocol whatsoever

 

Thanks for all your help!

[dx100uk]

yes tell them you want court bailiffs to enforce the collection of your awarded costs

[narrox]

Now that would be amusing, a collection for £18.90!

 

Its simply the principle at this point really!

[ericsbrother]

What did the judge say about payemt of costs

- immediate or 14 days (usual)

 

 

If they dont pay you instruct the court bailiff to collect from SIP.

 

 

Phone the court number and press 2 for bailiff or whatever, phone early or they will be out chasing others.

 

Gladstones will do their usual and wash their hands of this matter despite it being them that caused all of the bother in the first place being the IPC in a different frock and all that. Still SIP will have learned a lesson.