Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help - Endsleigh Loss adjuster's


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2820 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, this is my first post on the site and I hope someone can help.

 

I had to take my tenants to court in order for them to leave my property. They caused extensive damage to my new build property - removing boiler, radiator's all the built in goods and smashing through walls.

 

The Police have arrested the ex-tenants due to the extent of the damage and the matter is still pending - although the Police have informed me they are not hopeful of prosecution :|

 

I submitted a claim in April on my Landlords insurance building cover through Endsleigh. A few days after Endsleigh’s loss adjuster visited and carried out an assessment of the property. He stated that the damage was extensive and that the policy would only cover to the value of £25,000 and that I would have to cover the rest.

 

Over the last couple of months I have been emailing and calling the insurance company chasing up the claim. Endsleigh say they are waiting on the loss adjuster and the loss adjuster says its the contractor company. The contractor says its the loss adjuster. I complained a couple of weeks ago and the loss adjuster contacted me and said everything was now submitted and it would be sorted shortly. He also informed me the costs were over the cover level of £25,000 (but would not tell me the amount) and I would have to cover the rest.

 

I was relived as it was finally getting sorted. The rental of the property is a source of income for me (I am retired), having to find the costs for service charges & council tax etc is having a impact on my finances the longer it takes to sort to out and I cannot recoup these charges.

 

Now to my surprise, today I received a message informing me that AXA will be sending out a loss adjuster from a Crawfords. I am informed Axa are the underwriters and they have said it’s because its over £25,000, although I am not insured for anything over £25000

 

I am now back to square one again. I do not know why they are employing another loss adjuster but this is going to delay matters further. Can I ask Endsleigh

 

1) To base any settlement on their original loss adjuster’s report ? I am confused as to why they are not doing this anyway

as I have waited months for Endsleigh & the loss adjuster to complete their process & report's.

 

2) Request the original loss adjusters report as they seem reluctant to provide me with this - am I entitled to this ?

 

3) Can I, not agree to allow Crawford’s to go through this whole process again?

as I have read complaints about their process, online . Axa say the reason Crawfords is involved is because the

damage to my property is over £25,000 but yet my building cover does not exceed £25,000.

 

I would really appreciate an advice

Many thanks

Edited by penny1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Confusing !

 

I think you need to get a written complaint off to the Chief Executive of Endsleigh ASAP, asking them to intervene on your behalf, as the claims process is turning into a nightmare.

 

I don't think there is any reason why you should not allow Crawfords to inspect, provided you get assurance that this should not delay the claim further.

 

It may be that Axa have been aware of the claim details and they are not happy. With tenants causing criminal damage to this extent, there may be questions about the vetting process and checking on how they were treating the property.

 

Without checking Endsleighs landlords policies, i would query the £25k limit. Are you happy this is written in the policy and you realised this when taking out the policy ?

 

Insurers are reluctant to provide copes of loss adjuster reports, but you can send a Data Protection Subject Access Request asking for all data held for the claim, incuding all documents, in particular Loss Adjuster reports. Advise them that as you will be a data subject in such a report, they have to provide it under the Data Protection Act.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi unclebulgaria67 .

I had queried the £25,000 limit but was told the claim came under malicious damage and that was the limit, which I did originally see in the policy.

I will send a request for the Data Protection Subject access and see if Axa can tell me how much longer things will be delayed .Thank you for your advice and taking the time to respond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dacouc

I have gone through back over the policy and see there is a section for loss of rent. Would this mean I can claim for the rent now or would this be to late now .

Thank you for responding

Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally for an insured peril eg a Fire, a Landlord Policy will cover the loss of rental income, there may be an exclusion for Malicious Damage by Tenants as it's not covered by most Insurers so they might not include LOR.

 

Do you have a link to your Policy wording?

 

I'll have a look for the Policy wording in the meantime

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's this Policy https://secure.endsleigh.co.uk/HostDocs/PolicyBooklets/LLDPNL/current.pdf

 

Then this is the relevant wording

 

Malicious Damage "

a) Any payment in excess of £25,000 for malicious damage or vandalism

caused by a Standard or Student Tenant during any one Period of

Insurance

b) occurring after Your Property has been left Unfurnished or

Unoccupied for more than 120 consecutive days, this is lowered to 60

days for properties which are let to Standard Tenants

c) The first £1,000 of any claim for malicious damage or vandalism caused

by a Standard or Student Tenant

d) caused by You or Your family"

 

Note the £1000 excess you will be liable for which means you will receive a maximum of £24k under this section

 

(Page 3)

 

This is the LOR section

 

"Loss of Rent

We will pay up to 30% of the Buildings Sum Insured for loss of rent if the

Property becomes Unoccupied or partly Unoccupied and cannot be let

because of loss damage covered under “Section 1 – Cover for Your

Buildings”."

 

Subject to

 

"We will not pay for

a) loss of rent arising from the tenants leaving the Property without giving

You notice

b) rent the tenants have not paid

c) loss of rent to any Properties that were Unoccupied immediately before

the Insured Event giving rise to a claim

d) any letting agents share of the rent or any other expenses You must

pay to the letting agent

e) loss of rent arising from any part of the Property that is used for

anything other than domestic accommodation

f) loss of rent after the Property is fit to be let out

g) loss of rent for more than 12 months"

 

Page 5

 

Read the definition of the word "Unoccupied" on page 2

 

 

I've not noticed any relevant exclusions to prevent you claiming for LOR and putting a claim in for it will put a rocket up to sort the claim out.

 

Bear in mind you may not have initially lost rent as I assume you did not have tenant lined up to move in straight away, however depending on your local market it may have been the case that you could have moved new tenants in within a few weeks of the old tenants moving out.

 

Endsleigh and / or the Loss Adjuster should have pointed out to you that a claim for LOR was possible.

 

Number 27 under this statue can focus an Insurers mind http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2008/9780110811574/schedule/1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the valuble advice neither the loss adjuster or Endsleigh pointed out that I could claim for any loss of rent. I was just advised to forward the locksmiths invoice and Endsleigh wouldn't really provide me with any information and just told me to get in touch with the loss adjuster and he rarely responded to my emails. Thank you I will call them in the morning to investigate claiming for loss of rent. I wondered if I could claim for loss of rent to be kicked in while I am still waiting for them to sort out the actual orignal claim

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's worth bearing in mind, that if any of the delays that are caused by Axa or their agents (The LA) have increased the cost of the claim to you, then this would be unfair and the increased costs such as increases in material costs or further damage has occurred due to the work not being carried out should fall at Axa's doorstep.

 

The LOR is designed to cover your loss of rent for instance if there was a fire and your tenants moved out, your claim is no different according to the policy wording except that you knew the tenants were moving out so there would normally be a gap between the old tenants moving out and you sourcing new tenants. This would be calculated assuming the old tenants had not caused any damage and the property was ready bar your normal in between tenant processes eg cleaning etc.

 

Is the LA Axa are sending our from Crawfords a different Loss Adjusting firm to the original company appointed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dacouc

 

Endsleigh are the LA who commissioned the Loss adjusters. But now Axa have called to say they are the underwriters and because the claim was over £25,000 pounds they are sending a new loss adjuster called from a new company Crawfords who are a different firm from the original adjuster's by Endsleigh. The thing is the orignal loss adjuster made it clear from the onset that the costs may run over the £25000 so I am not sure why they now have to get a new company to start the process again.

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

A new company could be good news.

 

Loss Adjusters are professionals, whilst they want to get the best deal for the Insurer, they normally want you to get what the contract (The Policy) entitles you too.

 

This should be a good chance to raise the Loss of Rent claim and get the entire claim back on track.

 

I would not recommend slating the old LA too much, keep it civil, raise your concerns about the claim and that you want to get the property repaired and remarketed.

 

A good tip is to buy yourself a diary from the pound shop and start making notes of conversations, what was agreed, by whom and what time scale was given. This can be helpful to aid you on chasing the claim and is also handy if at a late date you want to make a complaint.

 

He should have a copy of the policy wording, so just refer him to the relevant LOR section and that you want to make a claim under this section

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dacouc

Your right this may give me the opportunity to get more clarity on my claim overall along with a timeframe as I just really want to get it back on the market or preferably sell it, as this has been a nightmare and I would not like to go through something like this ever again .I am glad to here your view of loss adjusters as it can be worry, as the perception on forums seems to be quite negitive. I would like to thank you for your input and great advice. I will post an update in the meantime its off to the pound shop I go:-D

 

Many many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't mention to the LA that you want to sell the property as the may say that if that was the case you would not have entered into a new six month AST, just put a claim in for LOR, once the the property is repaired etc you can decide to sell it then

 

Keep us updated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...