Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Work from home is "an aberration" that will be corrected as soon as possible says Goldman Sachs chief. View the full article
    • Work from home is "an aberration" that will be corrected as soon as possible says Goldman Sachs chief. View the full article
    • The mini electric vehicle being made by China's biggest carmaker is now outselling Tesla two to one. View the full article
    • https://www.bindmans.com/news/neale-v-dpp-the-right-to-silence-citizens-duties-and-coronavirus-regulations   Perhaps the OP should have said nothing - and risked arrest!   "Firstly, the case calls into question the logic behind aspects of the criminal justice response to the public health crisis created by the Coronavirus pandemic...   "Secondly, it is clear that some police officers have misunderstood and misstated their powers, and citizens’ obligations, under the Regulations and at common law...   "Thirdly, the case confirms reasonable excuses for being outside are not limited to those explicitly set out in the Regulations. Police officers considering whether there are reasonable grounds for believing that an offence has been committed under the Regulations so that an FPN may be issued, or the reasonable grounds for suspicion that are necessary for an arrest, should give proper consideration to any explanation given by members of the public (and what a court might think of them) rather than only recognising those exceptions explicitly listed in the Regulations and/or government guidance...   Fourthly, the case is an example of a failure of the CPS review into prosecutions brought under Coronavirus Regulations, which has found that alarming numbers of cases were wrongly charged..."   Above quotes from the Bindman's article, not the decision.  Case arose from the first lockdown and was in Wales.  Same now?  Also was about not being at home - not mask wearing.    
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

iPlayer to require TV licence


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1636 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...

Does anyone know how this is going to work? My TV is only on wifi, not tuned into any TV channels, and I only ever watch either catch up or Netflix. I have no aerial. Up to now I haven't needed a TV licence because I don't have any way of watching live TV. Will I start getting hounded because I 'could' watch BBC iplayer even if I don't?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Does anyone know how this is going to work? My TV is only on wifi, not tuned into any TV channels, and I only ever watch either catch up or Netflix. I have no aerial. Up to now I haven't needed a TV licence because I don't have any way of watching live TV. Will I start getting hounded because I 'could' watch BBC iplayer even if I don't?

 

I thought that they were changing Iplayer, so that you had to confirm your licence number before you could view any of their programmes from 1st September ?

 

The current APP does not even need you to register. I would think this would have to change.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
Up to now I haven't needed a TV licence because I don't have any way of watching live TV. Will I start getting hounded because I 'could' watch BBC iplayer even if I don't?

 

No, you will get hounded because there is no TV licence registered for your address. TVL do not care that you don't watch any live TV or use iPlayer. Their assumption is that because you don't have a licence, you are breaking the law.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

Quote
No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.
Link to post
Share on other sites
No, you will get hounded because there is no TV licence registered for your address. TVL do not care that you don't watch any live TV or use iPlayer. Their assumption is that because you don't have a licence, you are breaking the law.

 

Is this harassment by TV licensing ?..

Link to post
Share on other sites

So far I have not been bothered other than confirming every couple of years that I have no way of receiving a live TV signal. If they are going to make iplayer somehow coded then I have nothing to worry about and they can check if they want. If they are just going to assume everyone has access to iplayer then even ownership of a mobile phone will require a TV licence won't it?

Link to post
Share on other sites
If they are just going to assume everyone has access to iplayer then even ownership of a mobile phone will require a TV licence won't it?

 

This is unfortunately another example of why the TV Licence is not fir for purpose.

Technology has changed and advanced to render this dinosaur of a revenue maker to the scrap heap.

 

The BBC are frightened of change, frightened of the technological advances that they have no control of so in their minds everyone who does not own a TV Licence is therefore liable to be harassed.

Just think though, every letter that you get through the post is a little less money Capita are making in profits.

 

Stigman

  • Confused 1

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites
[...]so in their minds everyone who does not own a TV Licence is therefore liable to be harassed.

Just think though, every letter that you get through the post is a little less money Capita are making in profits.

 

Indeed. I have had yet another letter through the door yesterday warning of an impending "home visit", so that is yet more money that they will waste. This agent of theirs will be refused access to the property in question and be instructed to leave by the most convenient route.

 

I'm in half a mind to write to John Hales, enforcement manager, Leicester reminding him of the penalties that could be imposed by the courts for harassment by himself or any of his agents. eg: Up to 6 months imprisonment, and/or a £5000 fine; or. punishable in the crown court with up to 5 years' imprisonment and an unlimited fine. But unfortunately, Capita do not publicise the address of the Leicester office...

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

Quote
No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.
Link to post
Share on other sites

its not harassment if you havent told them not to visit. They are mandated to chase up non payment.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
Indeed. I have had yet another letter through the door yesterday warning of an impending "home visit", so that is yet more money that they will waste. This agent of theirs will be refused access to the property in question and be instructed to leave by the most convenient route.

 

I'm in half a mind to write to John Hales, enforcement manager, Leicester reminding him of the penalties that could be imposed by the courts for harassment by himself or any of his agents. eg: Up to 6 months imprisonment, and/or a £5000 fine; or. punishable in the crown court with up to 5 years' imprisonment and an unlimited fine. But unfortunately, Capita do not publicise the address of the Leicester office...

 

You don't need to speak to them or even open up a door. They have no right of entry and have to ask whether they can come in. It is mostly Women with kids who get caught out, as the knock on the door causes kids to go to the door and the inspector hears the kids watching TV. The Women then complete a form admitting to the offence. There was an article in the press discussing this awhile back.

 

If you don't watch live TV at the address you can just complete the declaration form on the TVL website and then they will stop writing, but may visit to carry out an inspection at some point. But apparently several million have completed declarations, so it would be difficult to carry out inspections. They have enough people not buying licences or completing declarations to harass.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
If you don't watch live TV at the address you can just complete the declaration form on the TVL website and then they will stop writing, but may visit to carry out an inspection at some point. But apparently several million have completed declarations, so it would be difficult to carry out inspections. They have enough people not buying licences or completing declarations to harass.

 

Unfortunately, their form requires an email address and name (they would also like a telephone number too). Anecdotal evidence on the internet would suggest that even after submitting the form, the harassment continues. As there is no legal requirement to fill in the form, I'll forgo providing personal information.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

Quote
No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Will the licence still be tied to the address? The whole point of laptops, phones etc. is that you could watch anywhere you can get wifi so can you only watch iplayer in your own home from 1st September?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no doesn't say that at all

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if someone with a licence comes to stay with me can they watch iplayer on their own laptop even though my household is not covered or would I be at risk of prosecution?

Link to post
Share on other sites

as long as the household that that person normally resides in has a TV licence and they are covered by it - no.

its called mobile use

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Indeed. I have had yet another letter through the door yesterday warning of an impending "home visit", so that is yet more money that they will waste. This agent of theirs will be refused access to the property in question and be instructed to leave by the most convenient route.

 

I'm in half a mind to write to John Hales, enforcement manager, Leicester reminding him of the penalties that could be imposed by the courts for harassment by himself or any of his agents. eg: Up to 6 months imprisonment, and/or a £5000 fine; or. punishable in the crown court with up to 5 years' imprisonment and an unlimited fine. But unfortunately, Capita do not publicise the address of the Leicester office...

 

 

 

Your in leicester too mr p. Ive had letters for the last 2years and no one has ever been

Link to post
Share on other sites
as long as the household that that person normally resides in has a TV licence and they are covered by it - no.

its called mobile use

Thank you. I had visions of having to make guests surrender all devices before they retired to their rooms :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Your in leicester too mr p. Ive had letters for the last 2years and no one has ever been

 

Nope, some 120 miles away. Despite the distance, I've had one daytime visit and an evening call whilst out. Both within the last three months.

 

Would also add: I'm fast coming to the conclusion that this John Hales is a fictional character. He seems to pop up in Bromley, Birmingham, Bristol, Leicester, and more. Apparently be contacted via a PO box in Darwin (see: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/116717/response/289202/attach/html/3/RFI20120536%20final%20response.pdf.html).

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

Quote
No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Does anyone know how this is going to work? My TV is only on wifi, not tuned into any TV channels, and I only ever watch either catch up or Netflix. I have no aerial. Up to now I haven't needed a TV licence because I don't have any way of watching live TV. Will I start getting hounded because I 'could' watch BBC iplayer even if I don't?

 

iPlayer has had the ability to watch live TV for ages now.

 

 

Had you been doing this then you should have been paying for a license.

 

 

Surely (despite not legally needing a TV license) you listen to BBC radio or visit the BBC website

(I can't imagine there's a single person who genuinely doesn't)?

 

 

Don't you think you should pay towards the BBC if that is indeed the case?

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you are paying to use cag by donating are you?

same theory applies then according to you?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
so you are paying to use cag by donating are you?

same theory applies then according to you?

 

Not really as most websites like this are funded (to some extent) by advertising, coupled with the fact that I'm not a regular user of this site. I do however choose to donate to sites I use regularly, like the Guardian website (despite that also having some advertising).

Link to post
Share on other sites
Surely (despite not legally needing a TV license) you listen to BBC radio or visit the BBC website

By that logic anyone who only ever listens to the radio should have a licence. The radio licence was abolished a long time ago.

And no - I have never watched live broadcasts on iplayer. There's never anything on I want to watch when I want to watch it on any channel.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Not really as most websites like this are funded (to some extent) by advertising, coupled with the fact that I'm not a regular user of this site. I do however choose to donate to sites I use regularly, like the Guardian website (despite that also having some advertising).

 

Only 2 post from Jetsetjim and he chooses this one. Me thinks he works for Capita!:jaw:

Link to post
Share on other sites
There's no way this can be enforced accurately. it's going to be one big pain for them from which I doubt they recover anything.

I wonder whether the BBC have been promised access to internet connection records at some future date after the insidious IP Bill becomes law, mandating ISPs to keep logs of every website visited by their customers. If so, there's a simple way round that: connect to iPlayer via a secure VPN. You'll have to make sure to use a UK server of course or be automatically blocked.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...