Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Insurance cancellation question


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2797 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I suppose that this is especially for UncleBulgaria, I suppose – but anyone else can join in.

 

How does http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/3134/regulation/6/made paragraph 6b square with the advice given here https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/debt-and-money/insurance/managing-your-insurance-policy/cancelling-an-insurance-policy/ ?

 

On my reading, CA seem to have got it wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in a dispute with my insurers over auotmatic renewal... I cancelled too late and when they couldn't take the monthly direct debit payment, they took an unauthorised amount from my debit card for the whole year, whilst cancelling my policy. TB

I think that it would be helpful if you start a separate thread on this. I'm sure that you will get lots of advice about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems clear to me that the Consumer regulations linked to do not apply to Insurance contracts.

 

Insurance cancellations rights/cooling off periods have always been separate and i think CAB is correct. But their explanation is a bit wordy.

 

If you cancel before the policy cover starts as you have selected a future start date, you get a full refund of the premium, but would have to pay reasonable administration fee.

 

If you cancel within 14 days cooling offer period and cover has been provided, then you pay for the days cover has been provided and have to pay reasonable adminstrative fee.

 

If you cancel after 14 day cooling off period and cover has started, then you have to pay all premiums as the Insurers have written in the Insurance contract, as their terms of cancellation. In addition you have to pay reasonable administrative fee.

 

The bone of contention is what admin fee for cancellation is reasonable. It should be what is required by Insurers/brokers to cover their costs and they should be able to justify their reasonable admin fees on request. All Insurers/brokers charging admin fees should have a worked out calculation of how they arrived at their admin fees. Consumers unhappy with admin fees should complain and ask for a breakdown of the fees. If not supplied then they should ask for the fee back or to be waived or the complaint escalated to the FOS.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this.

 

I don't completely understand what you're saying. I understand that you agree that the Consumer Regulations don't apply to insurance contracts.

 

What I don't understand then is how the CA is correct and what law is it which obliges insurance companies to provide a 14 day cooling off period. I would agree that a reasonable administration fee should be payable in the event that the insurance company is doing you a favour, but if they are obliged by law then I would have thought that no fee would be payable – unless that law says otherwise.

 

Our insurance companies obliged to provide a 14 day cooling off period? This is what they say on the CA website

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then you have the unfair trading terms that apply to mid term cancellations. Insurers should have written the terms compliant with The law. If people think the terms are unfair they can complain, as explained in this FOS link.

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/ombudsman-news/54/insurance.htm

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps it is me with my brain struggling after a virus, but i think CAB is mostly correct, but it is not well written.

 

It is so long ago that coolling off periods and these cancellation terms came in. But they are confirmed in ICOBS.

 

https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/ICOBS/7/?view=chapter

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - but what about the 14 day cooling off period?

 

It seems to me that there is no cooling off period in insurance contracts and that means that the CA advice

You may want to cancel an insurance policy if you have just bought it and have changed your mind. By law, you have a minimum 14-day cooling-off period during which you can cancel the policy for any reason. If you’ve bought life insurance, the cooling-off period is 30 days.

is wrong.

 

Unless there is some other set of regulations around. In particular, the 30 day cooling off period for life insurance – I have heard of this somewhere but I can't remember where. It suggests to me that there must be some other regulation somewhere but unfortunately CA don't give their sources.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then you have the unfair trading terms that apply to mid term cancellations. Insurers should have written the terms compliant with The law. If people think the terms are unfair they can complain, as explained in this FOS link.

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/ombudsman-news/54/insurance.htm

Brilliant

thank you, that explains it all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But are 'cooling off' periods relevant in auto renewal...? TB

 

Insurers quite often include a 14 cooling off period after renewal. I am not sure the law requires this, but it might make practical sense to treat each 12 months the same. It is then less complicated.

 

You have to remember back to why these cooling off periods were brought in. It was when people started to buy their Insurance over the phone, rather than to visit an Insurance brokers. Because they were buying Insurance without being able to see anything, they were given 14 day cooling off period from when the Insurance documents were received.

 

With auto renewal which is a later innovation, i don't think it has been considered in regard to what affect it has on other rights. If an Insurers significantly changed the terms of the Insurance, i would argue that auto renewal is probably challengeable or that a new 14 cooling off period should be allowed. If for example you made a change to cover for a specific peril e.g exclude flood arising from water table increase or you doubled the premium for a particular postcode area, then these are significant changes. Whilst Insurers are required to bring significant changes to a policyholders attention, not all people properly study the details or not immediately on receipt of documents. Insurers normally issue renewal documents about 3 weeks ahead of renewal so people should make urgent enquiries if not received within 2 weeks of renewal. If they unsure about any changes in cover, they should phone Insurers for an explanation.

Edited by unclebulgaria67
Correction

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a great question.

 

I'm sure the answer must be yes but it needs trying out

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks! I am sure they must have sent renewal documents… possibly they went astray as the house next door often gets my mail and I get theirs because the house names both start with the same two words and the postman can't be arsed to check the name… or it might be hidden from view in the envelope window…

No excuses.. I should have kept my eye on the ball, but I've so much other stuff going on, insurance was the least of my problems… up until recently, anyway… I've got no money for essentials (like food) now that they have raided my bank account. TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...