Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I received PCN's from TFL and Southwark. 08/06/19   I spoke with Southwark regarding PCN's and thought it was sorted.   Didn't hear anything back until 17/01/20 when my car was taken by Marston EA.   TFL & Marston say they sent letters but have no proof.   I emailed TFL (19th June) through their online portal and again, via email on (14th Nov 2019) < the email on 14th has been viewed 17 times but no reply.   (so I have proof of contact, they don't) I asked them if they send via recoded delivery/signed for but they do not.   When my car was taken, I received a call from a friend saying it's on the back of a truck, outside his house (which is round the block from mine).   I ran round there and the EA was aggressive, shouted at me and refused to show ID/why he had taken my car.   I complained to Marston who denied it but sent me some of the footage.   I complained again through resolver.co.uk and Marston lied again.   Then I sent ALL my info and evidence etc.   They then took a few weeks and called me saying sorry and taking full responsibly for their EA's aggressive behaviour etc.   TFL are still refusing to comment.   Marston offered me £250 as a goodwill payment but obviously the pain and trauma causes - that doesn't cover it.   The police were called when they took my car cause I was so distressed and having a panic attack etc.   I've requested the phone call recording where they accepted guilt and that they had handled everything badly, including lying about the video on Resovler.   I feel like Marston know they've done wrong, but TFL still aren't in the know. (to my knowledge)   Also, I requested info from TFL via whatdotheyknow.com and TFL did a data protection breach by uploading my full details including address etc. to a public forum (and I didn't even ask anything specific about my case) so I feel like they did this out of spite/anger.   the www.whatdotheyknow.com team reprimanded them for this and advised me to complain.   I also paid £800+ to retrieve my vehicle and I have completed the OOT which was denied. I tried to take it to court but when I tried to do the 'low income' thing but they wanted bank statements which I couldn't get... then corona happened.   I've downloaded/uploaded the ZIP file from Resolver convos.   Basically; regarding the footage: my initial message to them, I made myself seem unaware and 'stupid' so they wrote a generic reply telling me that 'the footage is fine and the EA did nothing wrong' so they can't uphold my complaint, then once they sent that; I sent them the CIVEA rulebook and timestamps in the video to show that they were in the wrong and had further lied in their official response (which must be illegal) so when they received the in-depth response, I think they got scared, went away for a couple weeks and tried to get the nice sounding woman to call me up, say sorry and be really nice then offer me a measly £250. She also tried to rush me into agreeing.   
    • No it was about under by a couple grand.    Cheers
    • yes. Did you earn over £12,500  with that employer during the year?
    • No it was 1250L I guess that's the tax allowance limit code?    Cheers
  • Our picks

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1343 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

The PPI mis-selling scandal has dogged the banking world for a long time now, and bothered everyone with a variety of spam messages and mithering claims companies.

 

Now, it looks like we might have another mis-selling scandal, thanks to the insurance world.

 

The FCA think that insurance agents have potentially mis-sold policies to consumers, as well as falsifying documents, faking signatures, and sold products to people that will never, ever pay out.

 

The Financial Conduct Authority has been looking into all this, and said that their study of 15 insurance firms and the agents found widespread examples of poor practice.

 

They've also found companies that have failed to discipline an agent after they'd spotted their mis-selling deeds, and their falsification of customer documentation.

 

Other discoveries showed agents selling travel insurance to people with medical conditions, which aren't covered by the policy they ended up with.

 

As such, the FCA have given the insurance world a chance to sort themselves out, and ordered 'Section 166 reviews' on two companies, which means tha they'll have to pay for an independent firm to come in and review the way they do things.

 

Another two companies have been told to stop all sales activities. Sadly the FCA haven't named anyone in all this.

 

"General insurance is a large and important sector and we are concerned about the potential for customer detriment arising from the lack of oversight of appointed representatives," Jonathan Davidson, FCA director of supervision, said in a statement.

 

"All principal firms need to consider these findings and look again at their practices."

 

We wouldn't be surprised if there's compensation coming the way of people who have been mis-sold, in yet another headache for the UK's financial sector.

 

 

http://www.bitterwallet.com/insurance/fca-find-mis-selling-in-insurance-92730

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm currently trying to find out whether insurance firms who automatically renew without authorisation can force the customer to pay a fee when they try to cancel the policy. Did the customer aquiesce to the renewal by remaining silent? TB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm currently trying to find out whether insurance firms who automatically renew without authorisation can force the customer to pay a fee when they try to cancel the policy. Did the customer aquiesce to the renewal by remaining silent? TB

 

Just seen this.

 

When you buy Insurance you should be told all important information. This should include auto renewal if the payment method you select can be used for auto renewal. Now because most arrange online, this information will be contained in documents which might be viewable in a link if clicked on, before confirming payment to buy the Insurance. If you don't read it online, you would have to read the policy documents when they arrive in the post. Most people don't read their documents. They will scan read the letter to see if they need to do anything, check the certificate of Insurance and then put the documents somewhere safe.

 

Auto renewal is often a part of the Insurance contract. It is not a compulsory element and if you want Insurers to switch off this feature you can ask them to do this. If you don't bother to do this, accept the contract as written and then don't bother to read the renewal, the policy may be auto renewed. If the Insurers then have to cancel because you have taken out Insurance elsewhere then of course a cancellation admin fee can be charged, if it is part of the contract. If you never received any renewal documents, then you have a strong argument for Insurers to waive any admin fees.

 

In regard to the FCA miss-selling, where serious breaches have been found, i always find it disappointing that the FCA does not name the companies. I can understand why they don't, as it might put them out of business and be ruinous for investors, but if a company have had previous warnings, i don't understand why consumers should be left in the dark.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Auto renewal is often a part of the Insurance contract. It is not a compulsory element and if you want Insurers to switch off this feature you can ask them to do this.

It is the default setting whether you renew online or by phone. We shouldn't have to insist it's 'switched off' we should be given a clear choice to take it up if we wish. I renew by phone, pay the full premium up front and have to be quite forceful every year in making it clear that they do not have continuous authority.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...