Jump to content


Charge on My House


quizzical
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2829 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have two or three charges on my home as a result of unsecured (credit card) debt from about 10 years ago.

 

These charges do not appear on my credit report as they are over 6 years old.

However, if I try to sell my home, can the creditors (who are all debt purchasing companies and who all bought the debtor account for pennies on the pound and then turned it into a secured charge through a CCJ) impose the charge and block the sale of the property unless I pay them the full sum of the old debt?

 

I'd really like to know where I stand on this

, as I have my mum's care home bills to pay as well as my own living expenses.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

charging orders?

see the charging orders sticky for eg

they prob wont block a sale, rather just try and get their payment upon sale, if applicable.

need to state what type of interest the charges relate to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have two or three charges on my home as a result of unsecured (credit card) debt from about 10 years ago. These charges do not appear on my credit report as they are over 6 years old. However, if I try to sell my home, can the creditors (who are all debt purchasing companies and who all bought the debtor account for pennies on the pound and then turned it into a secured charge through a CCJ) impose the charge and block the sale of the property unless I pay them the full sum of the old debt?

 

I'd really like to know where I stand on this, as I have my mum's care home bills to pay as well as my own living expenses.

 

Thanks.

 

They may require an undertaking from your conveyancer that they will be paid from the proceeds of sale, as part of allowing the sale to proceed (the same way a mortgage company does for the outstanding mortgage settlement figure)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the house in joint names?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The house is not in joint names, just mine.

 

What I wanted to know was that, if my credit score is clear (which it is completely) because the debts are over 6 years old, how can these charges still be invoked upon sale of the house?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The house is not in joint names, just mine.

 

What I wanted to know was that, if my credit score is clear (which it is completely) because the debts are over 6 years old, how can these charges still be invoked upon sale of the house?

 

Yes. A charging order (if registered at the Land Registry) doesn't expire at 6 years, in the same way a CCJ* doesn't expire (even if no longer shown on a credit report).

 

* Yes, a CCJ would need the court's permission to enforce after 6 years, but it hasn't actually expired.

A charging order wouldn't need the court's permission to enforce after 6 years, unlike a CCJ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So a charging order would legally allow a debt purchasing company

who bought a debt 10 years ago for 3p on the pound

to extort 33 times the cost of what they paid for the (originally unsecured) debt

from the sale of my home

which I have worked to pay the mortgage for 20 years?

 

Is that right?

Is that legal?

Is that ethical?

Is that honest?

 

This is not right.

 

I want to be able to buy the debt back for 50% of what the last debt purchasing company paid for it.

It think that's fair.

 

Otherwise I face a retirement of poverty and want.

 

Is there no legislation in place that will defeat this stupid calumny?

 

I thought we were a civilised country?

Clearly not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So a charging order would legally allow a debt purchasing company

who bought a debt 10 years ago for 3p on the pound

to extort 33 times the cost of what they paid for the (originally unsecured) debt

from the sale of my home

which I have worked to pay the mortgage for 20 years?

 

Is that right? no

Is that legal? sadly yes

Is that ethical? they don't care

Is that honest? they don't care

This is not right.

 

I want to be able to buy the debt back for 50% of what the last debt purchasing company paid for it.

It think that's fair. - wont ever happen

 

Otherwise I face a retirement of poverty and want.

 

Is there no legislation in place that will defeat this stupid calumny?

- well there was yes, why didn't you defend the CCJ?

 

I thought we were a civilised country?

Clearly not.

 

always been that way

 

that's why DCA's make and portfolios [the phishing lists]

change hands for so much money

 

but yes its all bogus in a way.

 

but sorry if you didn't defend the judgements

then its of your own doing????

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's why I used ???

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

but sorry if you didn't defend the judgements

then its of your own doing????

 

dx

 

as above IF you didn't defend

not assuming you didn't

 

thus you say you did..

 

sadly we see so many CCJ's / CO's are the result of not defending.

 

shame you didnt discover cag all those years ago

i'm sure we could have helped avoid the CCJ's/CO's

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, indeed it is a shame I had not discovered CAG and the other useful resources, some of which, of course, were not available then.

 

I defended it but could not afford a lawyer. I turned up at court and conducted my own defence, but the debt purchasing company had hired a barrister who was able to convince the judge (or, let's face it, a stipendiary magistrate) that I was wrong and the debt purchasing spiv was right.

 

This resulted in the injustice which persists to day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...