Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claiming ESA for issues with mobilising here's a shocker


tommy456
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2838 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I found this on a forum for welfare rights and CAB advisers , This is what we are up against, it's disgusting It also appears not to be an isolated case in a specific area

 

Decsiion maker accepts customer walking ability is less than 20 metres but he could propel a

 

wheelchair so no LCW.

Statement in the decsion makers reasons as follows

The decision maker has considered that a wheelchair could be obtained through the NHS wheelchair service if required, the use of a wheelchair would enable XXXXXXXXXXXXXX to mobilise more than 200 metres so he could engage in the labour market by being able to mobilise in a fully accessible area, and if he has an inability to store a wheelchair at home, it would be a reasonable adjustment for the wheelchair to be stored at the employers premises if necessary”

I despair I really do

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well at least the decision makers reports aren't personalised then because I just checked my report and I have an identical paragraph which is word by word (bar my name being in it of course), suggesting I could use a wheelchair to get back into the labour market. Seriously, word by word it is identical.

 

 

Obviously they just cut and paste their little rulebook for anyone which pretty much proves that they don't view each case individually, it's just a copy and paste here and there regardless of the bundles of a claimants evidence that contradicts their reports in front of them.

 

 

I replied to that paragraph "I am somewhat confused as to how a wheelchair would help me with my vertigo?" I suspect that they hoped that I might spin around like being in some dodgem car. Maybe I should have accepted it and spun straight into the road and sued the ******* off them.

 

 

It really beggars belief doesn't it. It's about time someone took a legal case out against these [removed].

Edited by honeybee13
Pejorative word removed,
Link to post
Share on other sites

This would only work if other adaptions were made to the work place! For example, lifts that would accommodate the wheelchair. Space for the user to manoeuvre in the office - work place ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This would only work if other adaptions were made to the work place! For example, lifts that would accommodate the wheelchair. Space for the user to manoeuvre in the office - work place ?

 

Surely, given the laws in place, there are very few places where this wouldn't be possible?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should also take into account that, by their own rules, no one in a wheelchair can work above the ground floor! No DWP office admits anyone above the ground floor if they cannot get themselves down the stairs in an emergency.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should also take into account that, by their own rules, no one in a wheelchair can work above the ground floor! No DWP office admits anyone above the ground floor if they cannot get themselves down the stairs in an emergency.

 

 

It's interesting that you say that because at my WCA I was asked that prior to the assessment because all the rooms were upstairs. I replied that I should be ok if I didn't have an attack but I suspect everyone who was there was asked the same question. So for everyone that had a WCA at that venue I suspect we pretty much all failed straight away on the basis that we said that we could probably get downstairs in the event of a fire. Would be interesting to see what happened to those that said they couldn't considering there were no options of a downstairs room.

 

 

Interestingly my Job Centre has three flights of stairs to navigate and a lift that rarely works!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would be interesting to see what happened to those that said they couldn't considering there were no options of a downstairs room.

 

 

 

There are plenty of accounts of people being turned away from assessment centres (still!) because they can't do stairs and all the rooms are upstairs. I've been refused entry to my local jobcentre because all the interview rooms etc are upstairs - the ground floor is basically an enquiry desk with a security guard stood next to it.

 

The ICE didn't uphold my complaint about ATOS taking 2 years to assess me because they said I'd refused to attend an assessment centre at all when in fact none of those in my area have ground floor rooms so I refused to go because I knew they wouldn't let me in.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A reply from an on the ball case worker ,But whilst it's all very well a wheelchair being stored at this fictitious work place ,it is of no use to the claimant when they are at home, or to enable them to commute from home to the workplace ,or do our brain dead DWP not consider this?

 

That’s wrong on so many levels it is at least fun to list them and the tribunal judge is clearly desperate to be flagellated by an Upper Tribunal Judge.

So, let’s list them then… smile.gif

- Any evidence of whether client eligible for an NHS wheelchair?

- Any evidence on the length of time on the waiting list?

- What is a “fully accessible area”? I’ve yet to see one if that helps.

- Does one merely have to access one “fully accessible area” to be able to work? Would it be okay to be able to wheel along a carpeted floor if there was no lift and no accessible toilet (you’ll gather I AM enjoying this!)?

- Oh yeah, does the appellant drive? If not, will their imaginary wheelchair go on a bus, train or tram at peak hours thus enabling them to, er, get to work? Oh, and from work obviously!

- Does anyone know of an employer happy to provide a space to store your wheelchair overnight? Will that include weekends when the employer is possibly shut or am I just being awkward?

- A ‘reasonable adjustment’ enables employment or retention of same. Storage of wheelchairs doesn’t enable either of those things unless the wheelchair would have to go back in the absence of any storage area.

they apparently used this case law http://www.osscsc.gov.uk/Aspx/view.aspx?id=4245

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it's a health and Safety rule that if you are unable to negotiate stairs then you can't be expected to attend on an upper floor, as the lifts will be switched off in the event of a fire, But the likes of atos and maximus will still give appointments at places were their located on above ground level be that 1st or 2nd floors, or below ground level, (these will usually have ramps)

 

It's then up to the their intended victim to re arrange the appointment to a different location that is ground floor or is disabled friendly adapted

Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of smaller companies would simply not employ someone who has such limitations , because their building maybe too small, and who is going to pay the employer to make said adaptations , ? then there is what if they don't own the property a landlord may prevent them making structural changes , being in a wheelchair is going to seriously limit a persons ability to find work as well as the type of work they are able or more importantly are happy to do

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is access to work which would pay for taxis (you'd pay the public transport cost) for you to get to work, if you couldn't drive due to medical problems or use public transport.

 

https://www.gov.uk/access-to-work/eligibility

You might still qualify for Access to Work if you earn less than £105 a week and either work:
Who is going to work for even less than what pittance is paid in benefits? If worked full time 5-6 days a week the cost of taxi's would be probative , and depending on where the workplace was could mean someone is out of pocket costing them to go to work, IBS would love that
Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2013/aug/29/paralympics-legacy-disabled-people

 

 

http://www.evenbreak.co.uk/blog/paralympics-good-or-bad-for-disabled-people/

 

For those who believe the lies about most disabled people being benefit scroungers (in reality it’s less than 1%), I have heard people suggest, almost seriously, that if disabled people just put a bit of effort in they could also be world class athletes, let alone get a job. This is as ridiculous as suggesting that with a bit of effort, every man in the street could beat Usain Bolt!

 

 

challenged the stereotype that disabled people can’t achieve. It helped us focus on what these athletes could do rather than what they couldn’t – a message I’m constantly trying to get across to employers.

 

For a few days, the general public weren’t purely thinking of disabled people as benefit scroungers, and therefore legitimate targets for hate crime.

 

It forced our capital city to think about accessibility issues across the infrastructure, particularly including transport. For a couple of weeks it was less difficult for disabled people to travel around London, with lots of volunteers and portable ramps.

 

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder why they don't give wheelchair users a phone and a pc at home and employ them directly to answer their helpline considering that their response time goes over 30 minutes on a good day.

 

It's called money

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's that???

What they don't want to pay genuinely disabled people.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's an observation from my father.

 

When he attended his assessment, he noticed all the rooms where a long way from the waiting rooms, they assessors would then walk you to their office where you would proceed to tell them how you struggle. Which obviously, they would then tell you how you walked all the way to the office.

 

But we all know, push comes to shove, most, if not the majority can walk much further, BUT BUT BUT, this isn't something that can be done all the time, more like a once a day thing, reserve energy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...