Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2838 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is a long story so quick summary is as follows;

 

In oct 2014 i got a ccj for unpaid business rent made against me it went to a collection agency and i set up monthly payments then defaulted in jan this year it went to court enforcement services ltd and finally an enforcement officer visited on 6/7/16

 

I told him i couldn't pay he then managed to get me to sign a controlled goods order on my husbands car(stupid i know) and told me to pay £500 the following monday. i rung payplan debt charity and after going through my finances they advised a DRO but i cant get it until the CGO is removed as is counted as a secured debt they said this should be easy to do as the car is my husbands property and not mine and the debt is in my name only.

 

Turns out this is not easy to do at all! i have spoken to countless people and all have given me conflicting info. on my adventure to remove this CGO i have found that some of the debt the claimant wants is not actually mine as somebody else rented the shop i owe for during my tenancy but i am struggling to find actual proof.

 

A couple of people have said to get the judgement set aside with an n244 form but i now don't know what it is i am asking to have set aside the bailiff or the whole judgement from the landlord.

 

hope this makes sense to somebody any help would be appreciated

Edited by Andyorch
Paras added
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure the set aside is the way forward, as you accepted judgement and started to pay it. You have only since found that part of the judgement amount is not owed by you.

 

Your husband might be able to go to court to state his ownership of the car and that is not yours, therefore the CGO should be removed. I believe there is a process for this and others might be able to advise cost.

 

Have you contacted the creditor the money is owed to about this mistake in regard to the amount owed. I think you should do that, as i believe the creditor can contact the court to correct the judgement amount, rather than you make a court application about the judgement, which would cost you a fee, unless you are on low income or benefits.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The link below sets out the process very clearly for reclaiming third party goods. It's the simplest explanation I've found so far. I'm unsure about the set aside, so will leave that for others to advise on.

 

https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/debt-and-money/action-your-creditor-can-take/bailiffs/your-belongings-and-bailiffs/what-goods-can-a-bailiff-take/belongings-owned-by-other-people-bailiffs/

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks, i have been to the CAB and the adviser there informed me of a little known thing of marital assets that only seem to apply to bailiffs he said their agreement was valid

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a long story so quick summary is as follows;

 

In oct 2014 i got a ccj for unpaid business rent made against me it went to a collection agency and i set up monthly payments then defaulted in jan this year it went to court enforcement services ltd and finally an enforcement officer visited on 6/7/16

 

I told him i couldn't pay he then managed to get me to sign a controlled goods order on my husbands car(stupid i know) and told me to pay £500 the following monday. i rung payplan debt charity and after going through my finances they advised a DRO but i cant get it until the CGO is removed as is counted as a secured debt they said this should be easy to do as the car is my husbands property and not mine and the debt is in my name only.

 

Turns out this is not easy to do at all! i have spoken to countless people and all have given me conflicting info. on my adventure to remove this CGO i have found that some of the debt the claimant wants is not actually mine as somebody else rented the shop i owe for during my tenancy but i am struggling to find actual proof.

 

A couple of people have said to get the judgement set aside with an n244 form but i now don't know what it is i am asking to have set aside the bailiff or the whole judgement from the landlord.

 

hope this makes sense to somebody any help would be appreciated

 

There are a few things that need to be clarified, at the time the cg was entered into was the car in question on finance (HP)? has your husband made a third party claim to the car?

 

With regard to the tenancy, was the Landlord aware the premises were no longer being used by you and did h/she agree to the arrangement for someone else to take over the lease?

 

Have you asked the LL for a copy of the rent arrears to show when from and to, you owed rent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think a husbands car can be claimed as joint property for a sole debt owned by their wife ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think a husbands car can be claimed as joint property for a sole debt owned by their wife ?

 

That is correct, the only exception being if the goods are jointly owned in which case the goods can be taken into control.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

What were the terms on the CGA are these unavoidable?

 

Have you made any payments so far ?

 

Is that agreement now in default ?

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also this was a CRAR action so are you and your other half joint tenants in the property ?

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

As for setting aside, presuming that this is a CRAR action the set aside application will be against the notice of enforcement as there will be no order, sorry only just seen the question.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a long story so quick summary is as follows;

 

In oct 2014 i got a ccj for unpaid business rent made against me it went to a collection agency and i set up monthly payments then defaulted in jan this year it went to court enforcement services ltd and finally an enforcement officer visited on 6/7/16

 

I told him i couldn't pay he then managed to get me to sign a controlled goods order on my husbands car(stupid i know) and told me to pay £500 the following monday. i rung payplan debt charity and after going through my finances they advised a DRO but i cant get it until the CGO is removed as is counted as a secured debt they said this should be easy to do as the car is my husbands property and not mine and the debt is in my name only.

 

Turns out this is not easy to do at all! i have spoken to countless people and all have given me conflicting info. on my adventure to remove this CGO i have found that some of the debt the claimant wants is not actually mine as somebody else rented the shop i owe for during my tenancy but i am struggling to find actual proof.

 

It has been a very busy week so please forgive me if I am wrong, but I seem to remember that I spoke with you earlier in the week. You were considering going to the County Court to get a Statutory Declaration signed and my initial advice to you, was that this was not the correct route. I think that you also sent me a query via my website.

 

To comply with Data Protection requirements, all our enquiries are deleted after they are responded to, so I cannot look back on any notes. I will have to rely upon my memory instead.

 

If I am right, a CCJ was obtained against you in relation to unpaid rent for a shop that you rented. The CCJ is in your sole name, but the debt arose after you were married and I informed you that under the 2014 bailiff regulations, an enforcement agent can seize 'jointly owned' goods. It was this point that was of importance. I think (and again I may be mistaken) that I informed you that the correct procedure is for your hubby to submit a 'Part 85' claim to the enforcement agency on the basis that the vehicle is his.

 

Given the additional information provided by you in this thread, it would seem that there may be scope for you to consider an N244. I am not the best person to advise of these. Wonkey Donkey or Ploddertom are the experts, and hopefully one of them will pick up this query sometime today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Lewlew, I was confusing your query with another which is an ongoing rental.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...