Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


cruzhughes

Welcome secured loans/charge - sold to Alpha/Prime -repo received - ***Claim Dismissed***

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 206 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

tough luck on them then..

its only the judge that can force you to pay..and IMHO the whole debacle has not been addressed.


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, the whole DCA industry would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No it hasn’t. But I really hope there’s some further progress in the new year :???:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DX - are you including charges applied to previous loans that are not part of the current chain? I mean, anything pre-February 2006? This being the date that one loan was settled, then a break of eight months was had before a brand new loan was taken out, and subsequently culminated in becoming the first link of the chain that the current agreement.

 

The charges and interest from the October 2006 loan onwards wouldn't amount to the full balance. You most likely know all Cruz's loans better than me, so I'd like to hear your views.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

have you still that google drive link?


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, the whole DCA industry would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it was settled via a re-write with welcome.

 

more soon


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, the whole DCA industry would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly i'd lost the train of this..

no ..no link in a chain.


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, the whole DCA industry would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Loan 1 11/10/2001 For £7369.39 which had £1473.22 PPI and £130.00 Medicare added to it

 

Loan 2 rewrite on 10/06/2003 for £9809.68 and £1804.68 PPI.

 

Loan 3 rewrite on 31/03/2005 for £11423.67 and £1108.79 MIF. 17.80%@ £171.92 x 120 months

 

Loan 4 rewrite On 14/07/2005 for £13886.71 and £1352.87 MIF. 27% @ £272.06 x 120 months

 

Loan 5 rewrite on 29/12/2005 for £14792.00 and £1442.59 MIF 16.8% @ £189.11 x 180 months fully paid off in Feb 2006

 

New Loan no 6 taken out on 31/10/2006 for £8019.62 which had £1485.75 PPI, £180 life-care and £125 homecare with £2768.59 interest added to it.

26.5% @ £170.25 x 120 months

 

Loan 7 rewrite on 03/04/2007 for £14602.15 which had £2425.15 PPI and £175 personal accident plan with £3339.03 interest added.

22% @ £277.95 x 120 months

 

Loan 8 rewrite on 05/10/2007 for £26741.20 which had £4506.20 PPI and £10342.54 in interest added to it.

22% @£489.53 x 120 months

 

Loan 9 rewrite on 30/08/2008 for £30514.32 8.2% @ x £231.49 x 300 months. This is still running

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sadly i'd lost the train of this..

no ..no link in a chain.

 

Ok, so only charges relating to the agreements from October 2006 onwards should be calculated by Cruz and deducted from the balance. Right?

 

Just checking we're all in agreement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the other chain that was mentioned before was that they didn’t provide that linking loan in court which was

 

Loan no 7.

 

They provided info on loans 6, loan 8 and 9.

But they didn’t provide 7 for some strange reason in all their exhibits. Seems a bit bizzare especially as they tried to show an application for further advance but missed the linking one 6 into 7, 7 to 8 then 8 into 9!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who knows what their reasoning was, but I recall the charges that were applied to that particular loan being the worst of all.

Maybe that was the reason for them excluding it, or maybe it was just an oversight.

It's not relevant now anyway.

 

As I see it, let's just agree which charges and fees can be legitimately offset against this balance, then hit them with the revised balance and tell them they'll not be receiving a Penny more.

 

Furthermore, tell them that as they've chosen to ignore your constant complaints on this specific matter, that you have no other option but to advise them of your position and that they are welcome (pardon the pun) to, finally, engage with you on the matter.

 

The side issue is the monthly repayment amount. I'd like Andy's view on this.

 

DX - do you have a view on what Cruz should be paying each month, assuming there is a balance after fees and interest have been removed?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it was Loan no 8 the fees and interest were the worse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think it was Loan no 8 the fees and interest were the worse.

 

Sorry...I mean in terms of the size of them and number relative to the short term. I recall it only lasted a few months before the next rewrite, but they blasted you with charges in that time. The cumulative total of charges on other loans were probably higher, yes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Between loan 6 and 7 6months between rewrites

 

Between 7 and 8 6 months too

 

Between 8 and 9 10 months

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx in middle of composing a letter with shams help.

 

The basis of the letter is deducting all fees but what we need to be sure of is wether I start from first loan in 2003 right the way through 8 loans. Or start at Oct 2006 onwards to last loan 2008 (4 loans) as there was a break of 6 months without a direct rewrite from Feb 2006 to Oct 2006.

 

As you can imagine There is quite a bit of difference between putting all the loans in. But I can’t go after welcome for the 1st 4 pre 2006. Due to the scheme. But as you know from your calculations there is sums outstanding there.

 

We are working out the balance and need to get this correct. As I don’t want to be in **** if it goes back to court. However I understand it’s prime who would have the prove the link/ no link.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can’t seem to acesss the drop box file you shared with me either

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check in later


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, the whole DCA industry would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where am I going with all this.

 

Do I sit tight or get the letter off?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

working on getting lots of newer email stuff over to the google drive

i'll get there.

 

might give us a better idea when done..

 

in all the stuff.. is there clear proof the last loan before the gap and this chain resulting in this litigated loan number WAS paid off by was it a mortgage or something...??


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, the whole DCA industry would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

 

Not in sar off prime no.

 

Welcome sar yes

 

Mortgage sar yes remortgage was in Feb 2006 funds paid welcome in Feb 2006. Settled loan no 722.

 

Break of 8 months then new loan 257 taken out Oct 2006 for around 8k with new legal charge applied

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:thumb::thumb:

 

clear break then

thought id not lost the plot that much.


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, the whole DCA industry would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On all the ones before 2006 a new legal charge was applied each loan with the previous ones being removed . The land reg doc new charges were Changed to date of charge being exactly the same as dates of newer rewrite

 

But from Oct 2006 charge applied on that date but the further loans/charges were not amended date wise on Lr. So in 2007 2006 Charge should have come off and registered charge should then have been April 2007 then Oct 2007 then Aug 2008

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

think that tallies with the changes around that time

and I think andyorch has previously related to this if not here elsewhere.


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, the whole DCA industry would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that too. But just seems strange welcome didn’t do what they done on the last 4 that they consistently done on the first lot.

 

last loan legal charge was not witnessed and not signed in the presence of anyone it was left blank. Plus the signature on that one is well dodgy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fun and games with these again. I’ve recieved 2 arrears letter 10 days apart.... so that means I’m 2 monthly payments of 231.49 in arrears in less than 2 weeks.

 

Loan agreement states money is due a month after agreement date and every month after that. Agreement date is 28th of the month. So I’m presuming they were closed for 2 weeks over Xmas hence the date 4th of jan instead of 28th of Dec.

 

But how on earth can there be another month of arrears on 13th jan? When payment not due till 28th jan? I can count shame this muppets can’t..

 

Plus on the back of their letter they list their fees which are £51.60. But there’s £61.60 on these arrrears statment so extra £10 a time going on there 😂💦

 

Even in court the last judge said I’m paid up to July 2019 on 231

 

Prime are saying

Nov arrears 74.83

Dec arrears 231.49

Jan arrears 231.49

 

Total arrears £599.41

Prime 4 +13th Jan .pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...