Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome secured loans/charge - sold to Alpha/Prime -repo received - ***Claim Dismissed***


cruzhughes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1693 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Each sarl will have a portfolio of debts like the list you have

So will coast finance

 

The issue here is the only ones that can help or do anything is the FCA

I fear

 

Going by site history we see p'haps see 0.1 of 1% of people like you.

 

So out there are p'haps 1000's just like you

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Court order from last hearing

 

1 Claim dismissed

 

2 counterclaim dismissed

 

3 The claimant shall not be entitled to recover any costs against defendants under the loan agreement in relation to this dispute after 7th June

 

4 The claimant shall pay first defendants costs incurred in these proceedings as a litigant in person in 21days

 

 

Here’s reply from fca too

 

Thank you for your additional email to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

 

You have asked if Prime Credit 4 Sarl and Alpha Credit are regulated by the FCA.

 

Financial Services Register

The Financial Services Register is a public record that shows details of firms, individuals and other bodies that are, or have been, regulated by the FCA. I have searched the register for the following firms:

Prime Credit 4 Sarl - I found no match for a firm by this name however I did find a match for a firm by the name of Prime Credit 5 Sarl that was previously authorised; and

Alpha Credit - I was not able to find a match for Alpha Credit however I did find a match for Alpha Personal Credit that is authorised by the FCA; you should check the firm's details in the above link to determine if this is the same firm.

I hope this is helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received a letter from prime payment deadline is tomorrow... it did not include cheque.

 

However it says

We are writing in regards to court hearing in which DJ ordered costs are paid to you.

 

In order for us to make payment. Can you provide in writing bank account details along with your signature they have provided a slip to fill in.

 

Is this ok to do?

 

Thinking of giving them a savings account no with no link to my current accounts.

 

There is no mention of payments to them or anything else that was said in hearing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why can't they just send you a cheque

 

When is the 21 days up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if you are allowed to put the bailiffs in for costs. What is the value of it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well as it's over £600, I would investigate very seriously putting HCEO in. If you can do that then the other side will discover that they are going to be hit with close onto £2000 enforcement fees as well.

 

I suggest that you telephone HCEO today, explain to them the situation that you are trying to recover costs of £1400 and if you give them the work will they handle it. Make sure that they offer a no fee deal so that if they failed to collect then you don't have to pay anything – the claimant pays all.

 

If you can confirm that that can be done then I would write immediately to the other side and tell them not to muck around. They have the order. They left it to the last moment and if they don't send you a cheque by registered next day delivery then you will put in HCEO and they will be responsible for all costs. Tell them if the cheque is dishonoured then you will do the same thing.

 

Tell them that you're not prepared to give them any data or any signature because you don't trust them.

 

However phone HCEO first and make sure that they can enforce an order for costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ring the sheriff officers cruz not dcbl!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just rang Court fee Is £66.

 

There’s also a compliance fee of £90 if they are unsuccessful.

 

But they have advised that if they requesting my details it could be that they are trying to make payment and if I instructed them then they would have grounds for set aside. So would be wise to give details

Link to post
Share on other sites

Demand a cheque

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO by 1st class letter get free POP for the PO counter

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just spoke to them they don’t issue cheques anymore. I told them they should have paid me by tomorrow.

 

He said the only way I could speed things up is by emailing them the bank details and my signature rather than sending them in post. And ring in hour later to check they’ve been received and when payment will be made

 

I asked why they wanted the signature he said gdpr regs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

not heard of that one!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rang..., they hadn’t received email.

 

Then they went searching and found it.

 

Nothing will be done till Monday and will take 3 days to hit account.

 

Explained the court order stipulates it is due today not Monday or wed!

 

She said she’ll look into it!! Lol

 

Do you think I should send a letter or wait?

Link to post
Share on other sites

And another thingbthe automated service when I rang had a recorded messag saying your arrears are.... it was just over 6 grand..

 

Clearly they haven’t listened to judge.., but they are now 2 less than when I went to court :roll::-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...