Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK, you made a bad mistake by outing yourself as the driver. But that's not fatal.  It's a case of one argument unfortunately down, but lots of other arguments still standing.  Chiefly that this is a scam site with an invisible line separating two car parks in order to entrap motorists. 1.  As LFI says, send a SAR to MET so you can get your hands on their original invoice.  Invest in a 2nd class stamp and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office. 2.  About six months ago, when the tsunami of cases at this site started, lots of Caggers contacted the CEO of Starbucks  https://www.ceoemail.com/s.php?id=ceo-82463&c=Starbucks UK-General Manager  Starbucks then contacted EuroGarages which seems to be another company in their group, and which runs the Stansted branch, and which got the invoice withdrawn.  However, after one, two, 10, 20 of these cases Starbucks seemed to get fed up.  However, it's only an e-mail, and surely worth a shot.  Lay it on thick about being a regular Starbucks customer but on this occasion you found the branch closed, and it is completely unfair to be charged £100 for briefly stopping in a car park while trying to use Starbucks. The main point here though is that MET are very, very wary of starting court cases for this site.  If they don't do court there's no reason to pay them.
    • Thanks jk2054, you were indeed correct. I've received the court order requesting documents and the witness statement etc. which I will read through and begin to compile shortly.
    • Find out what these WhatsApp scams are and what to do if you receive a message from a scammerView the full article
    • You need to send Met an SAR and they will send you the original PCN .. However all their PCNs appear to be the same and as the car parks are on airport land the keeper is not liable for the debt. Only the driver is responsible. But there are other considerations which can be enough for you to win. Poorly lit signage; scam site, it's a penalty; as well as problems with the contract. So you have a lot of things going for you as well as Met are not keen to take well defended cases to Court.  
    • The brand, which runs 216 shops as well as franchised stores, is looking at ways to save cash.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome secured loans/charge - sold to Alpha/Prime -repo received - ***Claim Dismissed***


cruzhughes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1684 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok cheers shall I put copy of land registry document in with it? And do I need to list my last addresses since i left marital home. I had contact with welcome from the last address when I put last loan in dispute in April but haven't had anything since so they have not got my newest address

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

might be an idea

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again dx. You've been like a guardian angel. I will be donating after I get back from holidays. I can now go away without this playing on my mind over and over. You are worth your weight in gold as I know what a nightmare it was for me. :whoo::-):oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi little update on this.

 

 

I have recieved 2 responses off welcome a day apart with 2 different complaint reference numbers

the one focuses on the second loan ending in 769

none of the other pointers in letter I sent have really been adressed.

 

 

But they have asked for me to fill in a ppi claim form.

PDF Photos Welcome.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

name on page 2 [atts removed]

as long as its IS the FOS CQ

then fill it out.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Sadly nothing other than what can be expected.

 

Bottom line is you have the evidence and should you ever goto sell

I'd be advising your sols to ignore the charge

 

Can't see these new owners ever being able to enforce the charge now either

 

You could try the fscs and the FCA

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

let me read the whole thread again

 

bump if I miss you in the next few days.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx just a thought

I put the last account ending 84 in dispute back in march 2016.

This was well before I received a sar when in actual fact I requested a CCA on the debt they were chasing.

 

Unbeknown to me there were countless other debts before the one in 2008.

 

Are they actually allowed to sell a debt that was in dispute 6 weeks after it was put in dispute?

 

Just thinking about this whole welcome mess.

 

Just for you to know

I sent a debt in dispute letter back in March

after which they sent a demand for money

not a proper default letter.

 

After this I sent a cca request

they did not comply with this.

 

They wanted a signature.

I wrote back stating that the consumer credit act does not require one.

 

After this I received a sar did not request one.

 

Ain't heard a pip since April.

 

Does this make a difference to claim

do I put the claim for all loans or all the loans before the last one in 2008.

 

As I disputed the debt before I found out about all the others before

 

Here you go dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

ideally they shouldn't but never seen anything done when they do do this.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rule to themselves?? Not had any notice of assignment either. Weird bunch lo. Still leaves that charge ATM

 

Shall I start putting a spreadsheet together for all penalty charges from day one? You've done the spreadsheet for the last loan with regards to the Ppi and is it the same sheet I would use. What about the MIF and homecare and Medicare

 

What should I do next dx?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd put in claims for the lot

 

penalty charges using the CISHEET

 

MIF and homecare and Medicare using the STATINT sheet.

 

they might be saying that they have some kind of special dispensation to not refund anything

but at the end of the day

the whole amount of the charge [which should be removed] is totally made of things that are reclaimable and unlawful

 

I would be involving the fscs and the FCA now on the whole debacle.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll get them reclaim sheets done today. The 8 weeks is up on sat re ppi complaint I believe will check that. Fscs about the reclaim and fca about the irresponsible lending is it? I'll post sheets here after I've done them. Cheers

 

Here goes.

Can you take a look please

 

https://1drv.ms/x/s!An17yDeDsY-ign9tnaq5xFQ5ZMlC

 

still saying invalid xlsx file when I try to upload

 

Here's the statInt sheet too. I've added the actual intrest here.

 

Have I done them both right

PDF Photos 17-11-2016.pdf

PDF Photos Wel.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

save it as a .xls old version of excel

 

now why have yo included mif 3 times?

 

that's not how you fill it out

a copy for each mif and calculate it PCM every month same as the PPI

 

Here's the statInt sheet too. I've added the actual intrest here. Have I done them both right

2nd one is ok

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm doing it on iPad.

 

Could that be the issue?

 

MIF was on different account numbers so separate sheet for each account?

 

Is the charges sheet correct.

 

Do I calculate the homecare and Medicare the same way as the MIF.

 

I ain't got a clue lol

 

MIF £1,108.79 120 months = 9.239 a month??

 

Put that in 120 times?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you treat MIFS life etc as PPI

 

do the same thing.

 

charges is ok

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

one sheet for each

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no you don't add the full rebate on..

you say 8.25 PCM

so do the calc

 

 

ppiPCM/fullPCMx100=%

 

 

the that % part of the rebate on the date the rebate was given

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...