Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

New Labour member’s legal challenge against NEC decision?


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1563 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I am sure plenty of members are aware of Labours National Executive Committees (NEC)decision

to bar all members who joined in the last 6 months (100,000 people approximately) from voting in the new leadership race?

That is unless you pay a £25.00 membership fee within the next two days?

 

The questions I would like to pose are,

 

a)Is it illegal to, retrospectively, change the constitution/rules to deny the’ new’ labour party members a chance to vote?

 

b) How much would it cost to mount a legal challenge against their decision?

 

c) Would the new Labour party members be willing to pay an extra couple of quid to finance the challenge ?( here is my £2)

 

d) Would anyone from CAG be able to assist in setting up a secure holding account etc etc if required?

 

Now whether it’s Mark Twain,

 

“If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it.”

 

Or Ken Livingston’s twist on it (I think?)

 

“If voting made any difference they would ban it.”

 

Both quotes and the labour parties NEC decision give me grave concern in this world of “open and transparent democracy”.

 

Regards

Biff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the appropriate forum.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I know a political party can change their rules in line with their constituition. The NEC would have gone through this legally, referring it to senior Lawyers. One thing Labour is not short of, is Lawyers who are willing to share their opinions.

 

As the new leadership contest has not officially started, the new rules can be applied to it, once it is triggered. A Judge is unlikely to want to look into whether a political party can change their rules.

 

The costs of a judicial review are quite high ( don't know but read it is about £100k min ) and i believe if you lose, the other side i.e the Labour party in this case, can claim their costs against the parties seeking the review.

 

I doubt that CAG would get involved in any political issue, unless it was focused on Consumer rights.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Cheers for input.

 

As a "consumer", I paid my subscrciption to a join an organisation with voting rights. After I joined, my voting rights were taken away from me unless I pay an increase in my subs to £25.00?

 

a)Did I enter into a contract and is there a breach of that contract? and,

b)What are my rights/options?

 

Regards

Biff

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are not a consumer. You belong to a political party which has a constituition which is managed by the NEC. They can change the rules when they like, providing they follow their own constutuition rules. E.g they might have rules regarding whether they can change voting rights through a vote of the NEC or whether they need a vote of the whole membership.

 

As you might know the NEC decision by 18 votes to 14 to allow Corbyn on the ballot without 51 MP/MEP support, is going to be subject to a legal challenge. The challenge is to make Corbyn subject to the same rules as any others who seek to lead the party.

 

If you are unhappy about what is happening, then register a complaint with the Labour party chairman and if it relates to voting rights, then Labour might be subject to Electoral Commission rules. Quite often parties accept to bound by rules of how they should operate, so they meet democratic standards.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers and I already have registered a complaint!

 

I joined the Labour Party because I was invited, by two senior figures, a Mr Corbyn and by a Miss Eagle, who told me that "if I joined, I would have a vote in the leadership election"?

 

Regards

 

Biff

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the Labour party will split into two separate parties. Old Labour with Corbyn types and a new party who might join with the Lib Dems. I can't see how any left of centre party can compete with the Tories, because the Tories will raise about 4 times the amount of money to spend in elections and the constituences will be changed at a 2020 election with possibly 600 seats instead of the current 650.

 

While i like some of the economic ideas of McDonnell, he would never stand any chance given that the media hate him. And there are loads of pictures showing Corbyn and McDonnell meeting various dodgy people, that will be used by the media in a run up to an election, that would cause an election disaster for Labour. The Tories would win a landslide. For any left of centre party to stand a chance, they need a leader who appeals to most voters anywhere in the UK and a set of policies for the whole country. They need to get to this position way before any election, as they need to raise the election funds to compete with the Tories.

 

If the Labour parties NEC wants to change the rules, if the constituition allows this, then there is nothing stopping them. If you don't like the way the party is behaving, then campaign within the party or leave it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello. I'm back here after 10 years, since CAG helped me reclaim my bank charges. Hope all is well :smile:

 

I'm wondering if anyone can help me with some advice. I recently joined the a well known political Party.:smile: I opted to pay by direct debit and at that time I was told my membership would mean I could vote in the forthcoming leadership elections. This was a fundamental reason for my joining.

 

Since joining the terms of my membership have been changed meaning I am now not allowed to vote without paying a further £25.

 

I am wondering what legal ramifications are of changing the terms of my membership without more than a few days notice.

 

I have paid the £25 as this is very important to me, but I want to go about reclaiming it as soon as possible!

 

Any help or advice gratefully recieved

 

Saj x

Link to post
Share on other sites

We already have thread running on this saj....I will merge your thread into the above so its more a collective thread.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe that a political party can get into this mess. If they can't effectively run their own organisation, then they are nowhere near ready to be voted into government.

 

If the Trade Unions back Corbyn, they are signing up to Labour being out of power for at least 10 years and the Tories will legislate restricting rights of Trade Unions and workers. Why would the Trade Unions vote against the interests of their own members ? Does not make any sense to me.

 

As for issues about membership and having to pay £25, that is up to you to ask Labour for thier legal justification for this. I suspect that within their rules they can charge for various to cover their costs.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Organisations like political parties are run according to their constitution. When you become a member of an organisation, you sign up to that constitution. The same principle applies whether we are talking about a political party or your local wine tasting club.

 

Any organisation can set rules about who is eligible to vote for the leader of that organisation in its constitution. When you joined the Labour party, I think you will be seen to agree to the constitution of the Labour party which is freely available online. Assuming that the Labour party's constitution does give the NEC the power to impose this restriction, I don't think you can complain.

 

Personally I think it is reasonable to write a rule which says you must be a member for a certain period before you are entitled to vote in elections. I don't think its fair that long-term members who have been dedicated to their party for years can get drowned out by people simply joining to vote in one election and then leave again. Lots of private societies have a similar rule.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Personally I think it is reasonable to write a rule which says you must be a member for a certain period before you are entitled to vote in elections.

I agree 100%. I don't agree with making it retrospective. Quite right to bring it in but 100% wrong to back date it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...