Jump to content


BankFodder BankFodder

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Different statements. One has “at 59 mph overtaking on the approach” and the other “it was overtaking on the approach and in ....... at 49 mph”. So not the same statement (same ethos, different sentence structure).   perhaps they chose that site for the officer because it is an accident hotspot, and they know people do dodgy overtakes (while speeding) there .....??  
    • Hi.   I've moved your thread to the Bailiffs forum. People should be along to advise later.   HB
    • So a little update;   Of the 6 letters I sent 3 were acknowledged. One accepting £1/month for now and two from the same creditor trading under different names asking for full I&E which I haven't done.   In a moment of madness I managed to depsoit 5k to a gambling site I didn't have due to paypal's crazy policy of allowing payments which are to be collected by direct debit after a couple of days to gambling sites! Mad they allow this but this will show as a negative paypal balance (in a different account to the original "debt"). The first paypal -£5k account has been closed and passed to a DCA now. I have ignored them.   My council has appeared to have stepped up their collection efforts for £2.5k in alleged housing benefit overpayment from 2015/16. I have acknowledged their letters over the past 3 years each time by email but they rarely respond to my pleas. I truly think if there was overpayment then it was for less than half the amount they claim. At the time I didn't think I was being overpaid because I wasn't really working but I had stopped claiming JSA/ESA (and told them as much) but earned a couple of hundred pounds a month from sporadic work.   Also what I thought was a dormant debt from 2016 to Halifax has been actually sold ( to caboot? I think. Hard to keep track of everyone)   I've been getting phone calls daily but ignoring them for the most part. I did request all communication in writing in my original letters.   I feel incapable of dealing with these creditors and whilst initially I was feeling that I would be happy to just ignore all the letters (arreas, defaults and the like) and phone calls for an indefinite amount of time and  hope to make it 6 years to statute barred-ness and accept or defend any CCJ attempts that did arrive. I figured that avoiding these creditors for 3 months so far is 5% of the way there to statute barred! But I figre for these fairly sizeable amounts they probably won't all let it go and I will get some CCJ docs (never had to deal with that) However now my mood and thinking has changed.    I am looking again at insolvency. I'm over the DRO limit now so its BR or nothing. I was wondering why you said to not consider this and it would be stupid @dx100uk? Although shirking my debts/responsibilities it does seem like an "easy" way out at the moment. It would be so nice to know that what's done is done and to be able to draw a line in the sand and start again in a year or so and not have to avoid creditors or worry about what's coming next...   It certainly would help the environment what with the amount of letters that are arriving already(!) considering the first payment I missed was october/november (excluding the old halifax and council debts). I am exordinately stressed about it now even though I thought I would be already . Any advice would be great if it was to get my head out of the sand and contact people/do the ignoring thing and seeing what happens/reasons  to do or not to do bankruptcy for these unsecured debts?   Thanks      
    • Hi everybody   Had a knock on my door and was confronted by either a Bailiff or enforcement agent (not sure about the specific job title). When I opened the door he stuck his foot in so I couldn't close the door. I was video taping him so I took a few steps backward (to get him in shot) and he just fully entered the property despite me saying that I was denying him entry and he refused to leave thereafter.   Turns out that he was there to collect a court issued fine. I think from a Magistrates Court. He worked for this outfit:   www.marstonholdings.co.uk   The reason for the fine was something to do with "driving without car insurance". Now I had a cheap car a few years ago but it broke down and would cost more to fix than it was actually worth. So I sold the car for scrap and cancelled the insurance. Turns out you have to inform the DVLA when you scrap a car and them that it is no longer on the road (I was unaware). So this was the circumstances of the visit.   My question is did he have the lawful right to enter the property? I always thought these people were like vampires i.e. they can only come in if you invite them in.   tia Bear  
    • oppss again then if its the same person.   knows the road well so should know what the speeds are and where they apply..      
  • Our picks


Removal company insurance wont pay for missing/stolen items

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1323 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts



We have just had our storage and removal insurance claim denied

I don't know what to do next.

If I get anything wrong I'm sorry as this is my first post.


Back in October we paid for a large national removal firm to come to our house,

pack and export wrap all of our things and then take them to be stored in their warehouse for six months as we were moving to Eastern Europe to start a business.



We took out their own removal and storage insurance covering us up to the value of £23,000 as we listed all of the items about £500 separately as per their instructions.


When the time came for us to have our things delivered, we employed a second removal company to collect our things from the warehouse and deliver them to us in Eastern Europe.

We also took them up on their insurance, for the same amounts as above.


When our things arrived, everything looked fine at first,

but as we started to unpack we saw that almost all of the boxes had been opened,

then resealed and new box numbers put on with the old ones taken off.



Some boxes even had two completely different numbers on, and the contents of the boxes was completely different to what was written on the packing inventory.


Most of the boxes were almost empty too,

but in was done in such a way that you wouldn't be able to tell until the box was open.



For example, one of the boxes said that it contained my evening dresses and formal wear, it was a big box, but all it contained was our old and very worn picnic rug


Our little fire safe had also been broken into, you can see where the lock has been forced and the contents are gone.


We went through everything and the missing items come to just under £15,000.

We informed both removal companies within four days of receiving our things.



The first company who had stored the things said to fill out the insurance forms and get the information to them as soon as we could.


The second company said that it was not their responsibility as everything had looked in good order when they collected it, but their broker sent us the claim forms and said to submit the claim anway.


We put the claim in for the first removal company as the second removal company would not have been able to open and reseal the boxes as they did not have the branded labels with the first companys logo and details.


The first removal firm said that they had sent our claim off to their brokers underwriters and that we would hear directly from them.



After five weeks of not hearing anything, and of the removal company ignoring my emails and not putting me through to anyone when I called,



I called the broker instead who said that they had never received our claim details.

They asked me to send them directly to them, which I did.


They have sent me an email saying that they are denying the claim as it is the other removal companys responsibility as the goods were in good condition when the collected them.


I'm not sure what to do,

it is soul destroying,

these were hugely sentimental items,

we are devastated.



Any help or advice would be very greatly appreciated thank you.


Sorry I should have added that we have now moved back to the UK as my mother became very ill and we didn't want to be far away.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you taken photos of everything?


Who's the insurer?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes we have, we even took videos of us opening the boxes after we started to realise how much had been opened and resealed, and we submitted them all with the claim. We also contacted the police in Eastern Europe and in the UK, but both forces said that it was the other polices problem. The insurer or broker is ICA.


Thank you for replying.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only just read this. Awful thing to happen. The mistake here i think is to have two different Insurances, so no continous cover from the point your possessions were collected, until they were delivered to an address in Eastern Europe. Each Insurers therefore will decline the claim on the basis they don't know when the loss was suffered and the Police in each country won't be helpful either.


In this situation i think you really need to get to the bottom of what happened with the safe keeping of the boxes containing your possessions. You need a full explanation from both removal companies of the whole journey, from when your possessions were collected until the point they were delivered. Given what you say about the boxes being carefully resealed, so it was difficult to detect the theft, i should imagine it was done at a time the items were in storage for the longest period. Ask the companies whether they have been advised of other thefts occurring. Ask the local Police force whether they have records of thefts being reported at the removers warehouse.


You are more likely to succeed with a legal claim against the removal companies, than on the Insurance and should seek legal advice. I would guess that the second removal company would be responsible, as they took responsibility for the possessions you had itemised. If they had any suspicion of boxes feeling light, then they should have asked you to attend the warehouse to check the boxes.

We could do with some help from you.



 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group


If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...