Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi   With a SAR all you have to do is ask for 'ALL DATA' (this way it does not matter what format they hold that data whether it be digital, email, telephone calls (recorded), written etc).   They then have 30 Days to comply once they have acknowledged your SAR Request (that is unless they require ID Verification) which the 30 Days time limit does not start until they have verified your ID if requested)   Also can I add in DHL response in post#36 I hate it when any Company/Business etc. has the nerve to use the get out clause of 'Human Error'.    This is not the case as it was 'Maladministration' by DHL' not 'Human Error' as stated to you, irrespective of who/which employee of DHL made the 'Human Error' the buck stops with DHL as who/which employee made that error was Employed by DHL.
    • pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform. [if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] .  register as an individual  note the long gateway number given  then log in .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform .  defend all  leave jurisdiction unticked   goto the defence filing section  file the following:     1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).  2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980.  . If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant. .  3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC]  or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied. .. ..ends..   dx          
    • I passed on the article and link to friend. Between us we will now try get the required info to the correct location so that they (whoever in the Govt) can sort out what he is owed. I will keep you updated.  This thread may help others in similar situations. Ethel Street - very helpful research.  Thank you.  Seems like you came up trumps!
    • numerous erudio/drydens claimform threads here already - use our search top right.   your appears to be statute barred as you've never heard of erudio so would not have deferred since your last direct deferment to SLC in 2013    if you wish to bother to even send CCA/CPR that's upto you but the bottom line is to erudio you've ignored everything to date yoy might also ignore a claimform.   but ofcourse you are not!!   if the above is true   pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform. [if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] .  register as an individual  note the long gateway number given  then log in .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform .  defend all  leave jurisdiction unticked   goto the defence filing section  file the following: 1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).  2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980.  . If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant. .  3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC]  or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied. .. ..ends..   dx      
    • Well I would want my £50 back also but hey ho if your satisfied its been resolved.....there was no way you could ever be liable anyway as your contract was with TC not RC.   Thread title updated.   Andy
  • Our picks

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1450 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I would like to put a SAR in finding out what information my employers hold about me (I work for my local council).

 

In particular interest are some emails which a colleague who left under a compromise agreement sent about me.

 

 

My employer has email archives dating back ten years

so I know they are still available but wasn't sure how to word the request to make sure that these are included.

 

Any ideas

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Including, (but not limited to),

emails referring to me,

including (but not limited to) emails to/from the council and Person A,

within or around the period of to .

 

These may need personal information regarding Person A redacted,

but I require any information regarding me"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent, many thanks for this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Excellent, many thanks for this

 

It is just a suggestion : others might refine / correct it, but I hope it is a good starting point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can the council withhold information from A to the council if they feel A might be at risk if the information is revealed?

 

It seems unlikely they could withhold information the council provided to A. Which is the likely direction of flow of the information you seek?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was interested in the emails that A sent about me to other members of my team. There has been a definite campaign against me for over two years now, mostly centred around a long standing disability. Even though A has left the treatment is carrying on. I can't understand what has caused this level of prejudice, it's most random. Anyway I thought emails might be a good place to start.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If between individuals, and not part of the compromise agreement:

a) how do you know they exist?

b) if you can't state who they were between and the council state "we aren't aware we hold information on you, and it would be disproportionately expensive to trawl through / search a mass of archived e-mails now held only as an off-site backup that may or may not mention you" would that "let them off the hook"?

 

I'm asking as I don't know, but fear that they might have a "proportionality" defence. The more focused your query (emails from/ to Person A, from/to Persons B-whoever, within date span X, referring to you by name)

 

If they mention you only by forename, or "our friend", "you know who" or another descriptor that isn't clearly you : I doubt that would suffice to be "personal data" the council would have to disclose. You might 'know' it is about you, but how would the council know / be able to tell?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah I see what you mean, hadn't thought of that.

 

 

I'm aware there are some emails as one was accidently forwarded to me as part of an email chain. It had my surname in the subject, I guess there will be others. I can narrow the date period down using the email I just mentioned.

 

 

Thank you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

has the concil recognised you as disabled and if so would any adjustment they have made be in the sphere of these communications you are after? If so then you may have another way forward if they claim that the emails are priviledged information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my experience, unless the council is not bothered about sacking your colleagues, they will tamper with the emails to make "nicer".

The only email they can't change is the one you have received by mistake.

If you can still access it, take a picture of the screen, forward it to your private email, save a screenshot and a pdf file too.

Most likely that will be the only evidence of your colleagues messing about with you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi yes, I have been recognised as disabled for about twenty years, by my Gp. Hr and Occupational health. Although I think I read somewhere that you can only get protection of the Equality Act if a tribunal says you are covered. They do make reasonable adjustments sometimes but it really all depends on who I'm dealing with, mostly they forget. I've printed the email.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EA is a very broad brush so you are covered if you have informed your employer of disability and ask to be treated as disabled under EA Obviously you must have a permanent disability, a tribunal can only say that you are NOT covered rather than them being the arbiter of who is.

You should have put whet you wnat considering to the employer in a formal way so thye arent guessing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've put my SAR request in, I'll see what I get back.

Thanks for your help with this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...