Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • love the extra £1000 charge for confidentialy there BF   Also OP even if they don't offer OOC it doesn't mean your claim isn't good. I had 3 against EVRi that were heard over the last 3 weeks. They sent me emails asking me to discontinue as I wouldn't win. Went infront of a judge and won all 3.    Just remember the law is on your side. The judges will be aware of this.   Where you can its important to try to point out at the hearing the specific part of the contract they breached. I found this was very helpful and the Judge made reference to it when they gave their judgements and it seemed this was pretty important as once you have identified a specific breach the matter turns straight to liability. From there its a case of pointing out the unlawfullness of their insurance and then that should be it.
    • I know dx and thanks again for yours and others help. I was 99.999% certain last payment was over six years ago if not longer.  👍
    • Paragraph 23 – "standard industry practice" – put this in bold type. They are stupid to rely on this and we might as well carry on emphasising how stupid they are. I wonder why they could even have begun to think some kind of compelling argument – "the other boys do it so I do it as well…" Same with paragraph 26   Paragraph 45 – The Defendants have so far been unable to produce any judgements at any level which disagree with the three judgements…  …court, but I would respectfully request…   Just the few amendments above – and I think it's fine. I think you should stick to the format that you are using. This has been used lots of times and has even been applauded by judges for being meticulous and clear. You aren't a professional. Nobody is expecting professional standards and although it's important that you understand exactly what you are doing – you don't really want to come over to the judge that you have done this kind of thing before. As a litigant in person you get a certain licence/leeway from judges and that is helpful to you – especially if you are facing a professional advocate. The way this is laid out is far clearer than the mess that you will get from EVRi. Quite frankly they undermine their own credibility by trying to say that they should win simply because it is "standard industry practice". It wouldn't at all surprise me if EVRi make you a last moment offer of the entire value of your claim partly to avoid judgement and also partly to avoid the embarrassment of having this kind of rubbish exposed in court. If they do happen to do that, then you should make sure that they pay everything. If they suddenly make you an out-of-court offer and this means that they are worried that they are going to lose and so you must make sure that you get every penny – interest, costs – everything you claimed. Finally, if they do make you an out-of-court offer they will try to sign you up to a confidentiality agreement. The answer to that is absolutely – No. It's not part of the claim and if they want to settle then they settle the claim as it stands and don't try add anything on. If they want confidentiality then that will cost an extra £1000. If they don't like it then they can go do the other thing. Once you have made the amendments suggested above – it should be the final version. court,. I don't think we are going to make any more changes. Your next job good to make sure that you are completely familiar with it all. That you understand the arguments. Have you made a court familiarisation visit?
    • just type no need to keep hitting quote... as has already been said, they use their own criteria. if a person is not stated as linked to you on your file then no cant hurt you. not all creditors use every CRA provider, there are only 3 main credit file providers mind, the rest are just 3rd party data sharers. if you already have revolving credit on your file there is no need to apply for anything just 'because' you need to show you can handle money. if you have bank account(s) and a mortgage which you are servicing (paying) then nothing more can improve your score, despite what these 'scam' sites claiml  its all a CON!!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moneybarn have Return of Goods order + Money Order - help needed


FORMISTER
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1094 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

Been helping out yet another friend with some advice and as its some time since I advised on here regulary

I thought i would get up to speed.

 

My mate took out a Conditional Sale Agreement for a car with one of the subprime car finance companies.

 

He made his first 3 payments of approx £260

 

Being self employed sometimes money doesn't come in quick enough and he was late with his next payment.

 

They sent him a default notice

 

The arrears consisted of

1 month instalment

£48 of charges stated as administration costs

 

He paid the 1 month arrears (but not the admin costs) 1 day late after the deadline.

 

He then came home to a letter put through his door and a contact number.

he rang it, it was a man who said he had a repossession order for the car.

 

My mate sent him photos of the payments he had made in the 4 months he had the car

and the repo man said he was going to refer it back to his office.

 

In the mean time my mate spoke to me and I looked through his paperwork

and noticed that he had overpaid 1 month by £20 .

 

on his behalf I rang the finance company pretending to be him.

 

They told me that the contract had been terminated and he had to either pay a final settlement

or the car would be repossessed the next day.

 

I said how much currently is the arrears, £48 they replied.

So your repossessing for £48? Yes .

Cant he just pay the £48? No its too late, your contracts been terminated ,

there is nothing you can do about it.

 

i said lets go through the payments and he agreed that there there was an overpayment of £20 they hadn't accounted for .

I said so your default amount is incorrect then?

He said that doesn't matter, I argued.

 

 

In the end I said you get us a settlement figure and I will look for your invalid default notice (I hadn't seen it at this point)

 

30 mins later my mate has a missed call from them, he phones back and offices are closed.

 

10 mins later they phoned again (this is out of hours) and said

"Mr ***** ,

i wasn't very happy with the whole situation ,

i have spoken with my manager

and am delighted to say he has agreed to reinstate your agreement tomorrow

as long as you ring up and pay the £48 arrears

and this months payment which becomes due in the next few days"

 

he does all this and its all back on.

 

A month later, he hadn't reinstated his direct debit , so he pays online using their payment portal onvtime.

 

5 days later he gets a default sums notice- payment not received by DD £18 charge

 

This just raises a few questions for me

 

1 Can they default him in the first instance for being just 1 payment in arrears?

 

2 Can they add charges onto the default for £18 admin fees for non payment by DD?

 

3 Obviously the default was invalid otherwise they wouldn't of panicked and reinstated it,

but if the default is on his credit file can we get it removed?

 

4 Is there a difference between a default sums notice and a default notice?

 

Thanks in advance

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

who is the creditor name names

 

and also the repo guy has no legal powers

and is not a bailiff.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The creditor is MoneyBarn, read a few things about them , dot like what I hear!

 

I think the repo man is Anglia Uk ,my mates text picture is a bit blurry.

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

how did I guess it was moneybarn.

i'll move you to the MB forum

we know them well.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

right you are moved

go read all the threads here

does he actually want the car?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes he wants the car, i think the threat of repossession is over as they reinstated the agreement after sending him the termination notice, think they panicked when I picked up on the invalid default notice.

 

So i guess the questions are

1 Can they default him in the first instance for being just 1 payment in arrears?

 

2 Can they add charges onto the default for £18 admin. fees for non payment by DD?

 

3 Obviously the default was invalid otherwise they wouldn't of panicked and reinstated it,

but if the default is on his credit file can we get it removed?

 

4 Is a default sum notice for non payment by DD of £18 enforceable? He paid via their payment portal instead.

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes he wants the car, i think the threat of repossession is over as they reinstated the agreement after sending him the termination notice, think they panicked when I picked up on the invalid default notice.

 

So i guess the questions are

1 Can they default him in the first instance for being just 1 payment in arrears?

- they shouldn't issue a default notice for one missed payment no.

they can mark the calendar section if they wish without any notice.

 

2 Can they add charges onto the default for £18 admin. fees for non payment by DD?

- no they are an unlawful reclaimable penalty fees as per FCA rules

 

3 Obviously the default was invalid otherwise they wouldn't of panicked and reinstated it,

but if the default is on his credit file can we get it removed? as above

4 Is a default sum notice for non payment by DD of £18 enforceable?

He paid via their payment portal instead.

 

 

DSN is not a DN, simply bogpaper that means nowt

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX,

 

I was reasonable sure but never know if things have changed since i used to be on here as part of the HFO fan club

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi , I believe things have moved on since I started this thread last year.

 

I was posting on behalf of my mate with his issues with Moneybarn.

 

Having got up to date with his payments since then he had work issues and wasn't get paid and got behind again with his payments.

 

Since then he has defaulted and now received a default and a Country Court Claims form.

 

Going back on this they actually terminated his agreement last May and then panicked when I saw that the defaults were incorrect and he questioned them(see beginning of thread).

 

Is the agreement still valid? He didn't sign a new one or an agreement to reinstate the the original, he just kept paying.

 

Thanks in advance for your replies.

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

returned of goods order

or

a moneyclaim?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks DX, it may have to wait until tomorrow as I'm going to need all the information from him to answer that.

 

Thanks as always for your help so far

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

he still has the car yes?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and he still wants it?

is it running or needs work?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I believe so, its running but MOT due within a month.

 

That said he has a work van now (not his), so doubt it is an essential

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok get that link done

 

might be a time order time if they've not terminated

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX, I believe he has had a letter of termination .

 

Is there a minimum of payments he needs to be in arrears before they can terminate?

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought we were unsure that a default notice and a termination had been issue

need to see their POC first please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will post tomorrow, Cant read it on the WhatsApp photo he sent.

 

Is there any mileage in the fact they actually terminated the agreement unlawfully once already in 2016 and he's paid a further 16 payments since then?

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

possibly will all be down to the paperwork they produce and what they say in the poc of the claim..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX, as promised

 

Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn

Date of issue – 12.01.18

What is the claim for –

 

1. The claim in under the consumer credit act procedures for delivery up of the vehicle, arrears, the amount due and/or damages and interest, under a Regulated Conditional Sale Agreement.

2. The Money Claim element of this matter to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore pending return and sale of or loss of the vehicle.

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? yes

 

What is the value of the claim? 7500

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Car & Finance

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? After

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Creditor

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? N/A

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Yes

 

Why did you cease payments? Wasn’t getting paid by work as they had cashflow issues

What was the date of your last payment? 07/12/17

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan ? No

 

Also, in the same envelope is a

General Form of Judgement Order dated 24/1/18

For a return of goods hearing on 11th April 2018

 

How can that come in the same envelope as the claim form dated 12/1/18, thats 12 days difference

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...