Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

year and place of injury effects to claim industrial injuries benefit requirements


B Joe
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2868 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I broke my ankle at work in 2004, Due to medical negligence was forced to walk on said ankle for 5 years whilst still broken, so then needed multiple operations to address this, which never accomplished anything and will be on painkillers for the rest of my life and am unable to work due to this.

 

Question 1) Can I still claim for this as it has been over 12 years.

 

Question 2) if I was stopping in the isle of wight at a hotel for work,

and I sustained the injury after work hours, but was only on the isle of wight to work, can I still claim iib for the injury?

 

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are out of time to bring a personal injury claim. But if the injury and pain prevent you from working, you may be able to claim ESA (subject to savings & other household income).

 

Will alert the Site Team and see if anyone else can provide further advice.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was stopping in the isle of wight at a hotel for work,

and I sustained the injury after work hours, but was only on the isle of wight to work, can I still claim iib for the injury?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply, but my question was not about personal injury, or ESA

 

Question 1) Can I still claim iib for this as it has been over 12 years. (will have the problem for rest of life)

 

Question 2) if I was stopping in the isle of wight at a hotel for work,

and I sustained the injury after work hours, but was only on the isle of wight to work, can I still claim iib for the injury?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply, but my question was not about personal injury, or ESA

 

Question 1) Can I still claim iib for this as it has been over 12 years. (will have the problem for rest of life)

 

Question 2) if I was stopping in the isle of wight at a hotel for work,

and I sustained the injury after work hours, but was only on the isle of wight to work, can I still claim iib for the injury?

 

1) you can only claim within 3 years of the injury, (or the alleged clinical negligence for that), unless :

A) you were under 18, when the 3 years starts on your 18th birthday, or

B) you only had actual or "constructive" knowledge of your cause of action later, when the 3 years runs from date of knowledge (so, for negligence, from when you did or should have known of the negligence), unless

C) you were / are "a person under a disability"; which refers to persons lacking mental capacity to institute proceedings, where the 3 years runs from when that disability ends.

 

Why have you left it so long

A) for the original injury

B) for the alleged negligence?

 

2) irrelevant if you are outside the Limitation Act 3 year period.

 

Correction : you are asking about "iib" : do you mean iidb?

Have you asked :

 

Barnsley IIDB Centre

Mail Handling Site A

Wolverhampton

WV98 1SY

Telephone: 0345 758 5433

Textphone: 0345 608 8551

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why have I left what so long since the original injury, or negligence ?

There seems to be some confusion.

I am not asking about a personal injury claim.

 

I am asking about industrial injuries disablement benefit.

 

I broke the ankle in 2004

I am aware that 3 years has passed since then.

 

I am asking if I can claim industrial injuries disablement benefit for the injury that I sustained whilst at work that happened in 2004 as am unable to work due to the medical negligence that occurred in the failing to treat this ankle I mentioned which caused me to walk on a broken ankle for 5 years and have to undergo several surgery's and am still on painkillers for life.

 

Question 1) Can I still claim iidb for this accident, as it has been over 12 years (not the negligence that worsened the problem, just the initial brake, as I am aware that 3 years has passed since 2004) (will have the problem for rest of life)

 

Question 2) if I was stopping in the isle of wight at a hotel for work,

and I sustained the injury after work hours, but was only on the isle of wight to work, can I still claim iidb for the injury?

 

 

The reason why I never claimed iidb before, is because I only found out about iidb a few days ago.

 

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

May I ask if you answer C ) you were / are "a person under a disability"; which refers to persons lacking mental capacity to institute proceedings, where the 3 years runs from when that disability ends.

 

Means that if I could get a letter from my doctor stating that I have not been capable of instituting proceedings in 12 years due to lacking mental capacity, then the 3 limit time period to make a medical negligence claim will start from when I regained mental capacity, which could be only a few months ago?

 

 

Thank you very much for your answer.

Edited by B Joe
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

May I ask if you answer C ) you were / are "a person under a disability"; which refers to persons lacking mental capacity to institute proceedings, where the 3 years runs from when that disability ends.

 

Means that if I could get a letter from my doctor stating that I have not been capable of instituting proceedings in 12 years due to lacking mental capacity, then the 3 limit time period to make a medical negligence claim will start from when I regained mental capacity, which could be only a few months ago?

 

 

Thank you very much for your answer.

 

If the "clock never started ticking".

If you had competence at ANY time since ; the 3 years starts from then.

 

If you didn't have competence at any time until a few months ago, then yes, the three years didn't start until a few months ago.

 

However, I doubt a letter from a GP would do it alone. Who has been managing your affairs since 2009?

On what basis would you claim not being competent? It would be for you to show you weren't competent rather than the defendant of the claim show G that you were competant if you were aiming to get the Limitation Act 3 year provision disapplied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no specific time limit for claiming IIDB, so the fact that the accident happened 12 years ago will not in itself be a problem. Unfortunately I do not know whether the fact that you sustained the injury in a place you'd visited for work reasons, rather than actually at work, would make any difference.

 

IIDB is a complex benefit, probably more complex than we can really deal with on the forum. You're welcome to continue to post about it, of course, but I would suggest seeking a qualified benefits adviser to help - possibly start at the Citizens Advice Bureau for this.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...